Sign On
Create Account

Last

TypeCreatedCategoryCreatorSortVotesHidesRating
essay27-Oct-2001opinionconfetti unsorted501461.5%

Advanced_Stats

What does 'pure of heart' mean to you?

"A Patch of Blue" is a beautiful story of a blind girl who has never known love and a man who has known love but has also seen terrible cruelty. They fall in love, and throughout the book he calls her a 'pure of heart girl', referring to her innocence to the ways of the world and her desire to love and be loved.
Some people argue that it can mean lots of different things, not necessarily innocence or chastity.
How do you feel about it?



 

UserComment
mandy Gold Qualifier
posted 28-Oct-2001 6:45pm  
There is no such thing as pure of heart...we are humans...humans are basically bastards!
Jemmy
posted 28-Oct-2001 7:07pm  
I don't know...I think it can be interpreted any way you want, and it doesn't have just one meaning.
spidertea
posted 28-Oct-2001 8:30pm  
I think of it as someone who has good intentions, wants to help the world, etc.
Cleo
posted 28-Oct-2001 8:52pm  
Someone with peace & love in their heart.
confetti
posted 28-Oct-2001 8:54pm  
I think someone who can love with all of his or her heart.
It's funny, I think actually there's not so much of a paradox between Selena and Gordon. She had been 'done over', as she says, by one of her mother's clients (her mother was a hooker), she was daily exposed to the disgusting mode of living that her grandfather and mother had and had been witness to a murder as a child. Her father came home and slashed up one of her ma's clients. Rose-ann, her mother, in turn threw acid on him but missed--it hit Selena's face instead and she went blind. Gordon had been around the block, but I think they both had suffered about the same, although in different ways. And I do believe he was just as 'pure of heart' as she. I found myself falling in love with his character...
Has anyone else read the book? It's really marvelous.
Ian
posted 28-Oct-2001 9:05pm  
That is such a stupid chick book.
I think someone who sees more good in the world than not.
kirsty
posted 29-Oct-2001 12:29am  
It means that you feel you have done nothing wrong in your heart.
natsim
posted 29-Oct-2001 12:54am  
To me it means that someone is good right to the core! Someone who has only good intentions, who seeks to be honest in all their dealings with people, and who tries to live with integrity and openness. It's a high honour.

I don't agree that pure of heart means innocent to the ways of the world, but that someone who is pure of heart fully understands the ways of the world, and fully understands what is right and what is wrong. I think Mother Teresa was pure of heart, and she certainly understood the ways of the world.

Good survey!
Cain
posted 29-Oct-2001 7:25am  
To me, pure of heart means uncorrupted by the rest of the world. Pure in the sense of untainted, not neccessarily untouched by the outside world but of having had experience of the present evil and still being able to live a good and gracious life.
Maarten
(reply to mandy) posted 29-Oct-2001 10:06am  
That's not what Anne Frank said.
Biggles Bronze Star Survey Creator Gold Qualifier
posted 29-Oct-2001 11:24am  
It's a state of mind - not actual chastity. People can be innocents after years of marriage even if they are quite worldly.
jkiehart
posted 29-Oct-2001 12:46pm  
It's a nice way to say that someone is an idiot. Forrest Gump was "pure of heart."
(Well, the movie Forrest Gump. The book Forrest Gump slept with a lot women, swore, got drunk, and smoked.)
anoddoblivion
posted 29-Oct-2001 1:11pm  
The person considered Pure of heart is nothing but goodness.

To me, that would be one doing nothing but the will of God. It should be this way with everyone, but unfortunately is not.
Brian
posted 29-Oct-2001 1:38pm  
Pure of heart: to feel and response without selfishness or ulterior motives.

I recently made a substantial donation to my church. I prayed for a week for God to guide me to ensure I was doing so with a pure heart. He granted me that, and I am content.
jkiehart
(reply to Brian) posted 29-Oct-2001 2:22pm  
Oops! You just ruined it! The bible you're not supposed to tell people when you do things like that.
Don't sound your alms... like a trumpet... like the hypocrites. Something like that.
autumnlight
posted 29-Oct-2001 3:23pm  
Someone who has not given into tempation and not given up on their morals!
kaleb777
posted 29-Oct-2001 4:00pm  
Not a clue.
confetti
(reply to natsim) posted 29-Oct-2001 4:35pm  
I absolutely agreed with you until I remembered that Mother Theresa was extremely prejudiced against homosexuals. I don't know what your personal beliefs are on this, but I don't think a person who discriminates can be pure of heart.
Gamera
(reply to confetti) posted 29-Oct-2001 4:56pm  
One thing I've come to respect a great deal is someone who can be kind and loving and generous to people whom they don't like. If Mother Theresa was prejudiced against homosexuals, but still treated them/us with the same greatness of heart with which she treated anyone else, that would speak very well of her to me- I would not begrudge her the prejudice. Sometimes you cannot help the feeling that you have, but you can rise above them in your actions. If your intention to love is greater than some petty dislike you might have- I think that's more important than whether or not you have that dislike.
natsim
(reply to confetti) posted 29-Oct-2001 5:26pm  
So Mother Teresa was not perfect? So what? She was human too.
Mandy is right that no human can be perfectly pure of heart, but I think we have many examples of people who are pretty close. I would rather celebrate the amazing work that Mother Teresa did than pick on the things I don't like about her theology. Overall, she did much more good than harm.
confetti
(reply to Gamera) posted 29-Oct-2001 7:10pm  
There are a few observations on her behavior--her actions and her words that I've read concerning gays that left a bitter taste in my mouth. I'm glad she did the good things that she did, and I'm certainly not going to spit on her grave or anything...it's just sad that people aren't always open-minded.
confetti
(reply to natsim) posted 29-Oct-2001 7:12pm  
Of course, positive versus negative should always win out. I didn't mean to spoil stuff, I just pointed out something that not a lot of people are aware of. Please forgive this poor little confetti bird  * smile *
natsim
(reply to confetti) posted 29-Oct-2001 7:48pm  
Hey, no problems! I didn't know that she was prejudiced against homosexuals, but I'm not surprised. It seems that this issue has got more attention in more developed countries. In India where they are worried about basic survival, there is less importance placed on recognising the love that gay people have for each other. One step at a time, huh?
Zang
posted 29-Oct-2001 10:48pm  
Only good intentions. Lacking in any selfish motives.
mandy Gold Qualifier
(reply to Maarten) posted 29-Oct-2001 11:44pm  
no...it's what I said!
 * smile *
Anyway...I don't think she was allowed to swear....
Gamera
(reply to confetti) posted 30-Oct-2001 4:25am  
Yeah, it is sad. I agree with you. In a way, too, it's a little comforting. I try to be open and loving to all beings, but it just doesn't always work. I find myself getting angry at some petty stupid little thing, and I start to give up, thinking I'm not such a good person after all. Then I remember that the best people to come down the pike still had their major faults, and I go a little easier on myself, and find the courage to keep trying to do my best. Anyway, that's how the inside of my head works.  * smile *
Brian
(reply to jkiehart) posted 30-Oct-2001 7:36am  
You are correct. I was just sharing the dilemma I faced: How to do the right thing in the correct spirit. I will be the first to admit it is/was difficult not to feel self-satisfied. There is a Christian pleasure in giving. I need to go ask forgiveness for my big mouth.
jkiehart
(reply to Brian) posted 30-Oct-2001 8:56am  
I'm sorry, I just finished reading "My Goodness" by Joe Queenan, who tried to be "good," to farcical results. He's a really cranky man, and he decided to be more like Susan Sarandon, but the first chapter is regarding how much it irks him not that these privledged celebrities do good deeds, but how they toot their horns over it. Very funny book, if you like crotchety sarcastic people. And he's a friend of a friend, so, I'm biased.
Brian
(reply to jkiehart) posted 30-Oct-2001 11:23am  
I am crotchety sarcastic people!
You gotta problem with that!  * wink *
jkiehart
(reply to Brian) posted 30-Oct-2001 11:37am  
No sir!!
confetti
(reply to natsim) posted 30-Oct-2001 1:06pm  
Yes  * smile *
confetti
(reply to Gamera) posted 30-Oct-2001 1:09pm  
I think you're a marvelous, hilarious clear-thinking person (sorry, I've been reading my boarding school books yet again) and I certainly wouldn't mind having you for my friend. The human in us is our imperfections; the human in us is our desire to love.
juliw
posted 30-Oct-2001 3:00pm  
I think someone pure of heart has a heart full of love and compassion for their fellow man. They try to see the good in others without showing prejudice or being judgmental. "Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God."
juliw
(reply to confetti) posted 30-Oct-2001 3:13pm  
I didn't read the book, but I saw the movie "A Patch Of Blue", and it was wonderful.
confetti
(reply to juliw) posted 30-Oct-2001 3:29pm  
I'm glad you liked it. I think Poitier is one of the most wonderful actors of this past century.
juliw
(reply to confetti) posted 30-Oct-2001 3:44pm  
I do, too! Have you ever read the book, "To Sir, With Love", or seen the movie? That movie also starred Sidney Poitier, and it was really good.
Oscar
posted 30-Oct-2001 4:13pm  
Untarnished by things of the world and cruel people.
Biggles Bronze Star Survey Creator Gold Qualifier
(reply to juliw) posted 30-Oct-2001 4:21pm  
I've read that book! Brilliant! I never saw the movie, my mum advised me not to - she didn't like it. Was the movie set in the UK (like the book) or America?
juliw
(reply to Biggles) posted 30-Oct-2001 4:38pm  
I really don't remember, because I saw it about thirty years ago.
Biggles Bronze Star Survey Creator Gold Qualifier
(reply to juliw) posted 30-Oct-2001 4:45pm  
Old film then  * smile * Have you read the book recently? I found in the attic about 4 years ago and I've read it 2-3 times since then.
confetti
(reply to juliw) posted 30-Oct-2001 7:08pm  
Yes! Some of his movies are corny, but he just lights up the screen  * smile *
Gamera
(reply to confetti) posted 30-Oct-2001 11:14pm  
 * smile * Sorry I got lame in responding to your email, by the way. I got stressed and overwhelmed for a while, but I'm getting over it.
confetti
(reply to Gamera) posted 31-Oct-2001 10:32am  
It's okay. You self-proclaimed yourself as a non-punctual letter writer immediately, so you get some privileges...
Oscar
(reply to confetti) posted 31-Oct-2001 10:38am  
Who wrote this book? It sounds like it might be good to read.
juliw
(reply to Biggles) posted 31-Oct-2001 11:22am  
Actually, I haven't read the book in years, but after talking to you and confetti, I am thinking of reading both "A Patch Of Blue" and "To Sir, With Love".
confetti
(reply to Oscar) posted 31-Oct-2001 11:47am  
Elizabeth Kata.
Biggles Bronze Star Survey Creator Gold Qualifier
(reply to juliw) posted 31-Oct-2001 1:31pm  
Go for it!  * smile *
Dino
posted 16-Nov-2001 11:38am  
Someone with no hidden agenda.
mandy Gold Qualifier
posted 16-Nov-2001 11:15pm  
cleanly douched
nasale
posted 21-Nov-2001 7:52pm  
Kids- that's what I think of. The young ones, at least. There's nothing sweeter than a young child's smile and the level of trust they have.
Last
Advanced_Stats

If you'd like to vote and/or comment on this survey, please Sign On

 
Link this survey: http://surveycentral.org/survey/9636.html

Hits: 1 today (12 in the last 30 days)