| This Month's Best | Best Active | Best Inactive | Pick a Creator | Pick a Category | All |
| New Survey | Replies | Users | Search | Chat | Forum | Feedback | Statistics | Customize | Help |
| Type | Created | Category | Creator | Sort | Votes | Hides | Rating | |
| multiple | 29-Apr-2001 | opinion | confetti | by votes | 78 | 17 | 56.2% |
|
| User | Comment |
|---|---|
| Biggles | posted 30-Apr-2001 3:00pm No, because no such thing exists. |
| kaleb777 | posted 30-Apr-2001 3:04pm Personally I like olive skin, brown hair, tall, green or brown eyes and the bewbs go without saying. |
| Jemmy | posted 30-Apr-2001 3:50pm I don't think there is a standard of physical beauty. I mean the standard is so ridiculous that I think it has come to not exist. Plus, look at all the people who are considered physically beautiful. They all look pretty different to me. |
| spidertea | posted 30-Apr-2001 4:12pm Perhaps the standard. But there are plenty of beutiful women who fall under none of those descriptives. |
| Maarten | posted 30-Apr-2001 4:18pm No, but some of them come close, like Victoria Silvstedt. Yes, she's from Sweden. ![]() |
| Lana77 | posted 30-Apr-2001 4:50pm Barbie! |
| confetti | posted 30-Apr-2001 5:05pm No, though it seems so. I'm not sure a standard of physical beauty exists, but if it did...I saw a picture of Michelle Rodriguez a few days ago. She just looked so happy, tough and real. I think she is beautiful, physically. |
| confetti | (reply to Maarten) posted 30-Apr-2001 5:09pm She's not unattractive, but she look so cheap! Like a hooker! No offense to any sex workers on this site |
| happyme | posted 30-Apr-2001 5:10pm I am blonde, blue-eyed, big breasted, with full lips and a tall and slender body. Yes, I do believe I am beautiful. (I am also not very modest) |
| happyme | (reply to Maarten) posted 30-Apr-2001 5:13pm She looks like an animal! Is that really your idea of a beautiful girl?? |
| lara | posted 30-Apr-2001 5:30pm Not if you're a dolphin. |
| nasale | posted 30-Apr-2001 5:44pm Come on! for the few of us goddesses out there who don't fit your narrow, strict, insensitive, biased,baseless criteria that's a pile of doo-doo! |
| Iseult | posted 30-Apr-2001 6:00pm No. I could imagine a female with all those physical attributes, looking really ugly. |
| confetti | (reply to lara) posted 30-Apr-2001 7:59pm |
| HareKrishna | posted 30-Apr-2001 8:45pm The standard of physical female beauty is Radha. Hare Krishna! |
| Maarten | (reply to confetti) posted 30-Apr-2001 10:06pm I have better, less cheaper pics of her! |
| Maarten | (reply to happyme) posted 30-Apr-2001 10:08pm Yes, but there are better pics of her. I couldn't post them here though! |
| IanLovesPhoebe | posted 30-Apr-2001 10:31pm Never. The standard of physical female beauty is, in my opinion, a certain green-eyed brunette...short, but TOUGH! |
| IanLovesPhoebe | (reply to Maarten) posted 30-Apr-2001 10:32pm She looks about worth a buck. |
| confetti | (reply to Maarten) posted 30-Apr-2001 10:36pm You're perfectly mad, my friend |
| confetti | (reply to IanLovesPhoebe) posted 30-Apr-2001 10:38pm Oh, Ian, shut up! |
| Enheduanna | posted 30-Apr-2001 10:45pm Interesting advanced stats, especially the percentage of women vs. men who voted that there's no such thing, and who specified what the ideal is. |
| IanLovesPhoebe | (reply to confetti) posted 30-Apr-2001 10:48pm I'm just writing what's true. You ARE beautiful. |
| jettles | posted 30-Apr-2001 10:58pm nope, all women are beautiful!!!! |
| Maarten | (reply to IanLovesPhoebe) posted 30-Apr-2001 11:34pm I'm sure you couldn't afford her!! |
| Maarten | (reply to confetti) posted 30-Apr-2001 11:34pm |
| IanLovesPhoebe | (reply to Maarten) posted 30-Apr-2001 11:49pm Nope. The only women I like are priceless |
| confetti | (reply to IanLovesPhoebe) posted 30-Apr-2001 11:56pm Thanks a lot...you make me sound like a lamp at a flea market or something!!! |
| Maarten | (reply to confetti) posted 1-May-2001 12:03am lol |
| anonymous | posted 1-May-2001 12:07am What is with the lame explanation texts lately?? |
| honeybee | posted 1-May-2001 12:11am No such thing exists. But there are some faces that are more attractive than others. |
| honeybee | (reply to confetti) posted 1-May-2001 12:12am Good one! |
| IanLovesPhoebe | (reply to confetti) posted 1-May-2001 12:41am I'm just a witty genius...with a lamp for a girlfriend. |
| confetti | (reply to anonymous) posted 1-May-2001 12:44am #1...If you don't like it, you know what to do > |
| bcollins | posted 1-May-2001 1:02pm The standards change from person to person and country to country. What is beautiful in the U.S. is unattractive in another part of the world. I think the woman you described is the U.S. media's idea of the ideal woman. |
| bcollins | (reply to nasale) posted 1-May-2001 1:05pm doo doo? How crude! |
| Julia81 | posted 1-May-2001 1:40pm blonde women with blue eyes and large breasts, and big lips were popular in 60s and 70s(like M.Manro).....considering that it is 2001 ----->Carmen Electra is the standard of physical beauty now. |
| Maarten | (reply to Julia81) posted 1-May-2001 1:44pm Says who? |
| Julia81 | (reply to Maarten) posted 1-May-2001 2:03pm says-->public |
| cody | posted 2-May-2001 3:09am I do believe there is a genetic basis for determining what we would call 'beauty', that is fairly universal, but I don't believe this, by any means to be what it points at. |
| cody | (reply to Julia81) posted 2-May-2001 3:13am But one thing never changes, and that is the hip-to-waist ratios. The magic number is 1:.68. |
| anonymous | posted 2-May-2001 5:44pm Brown, curly brown hair is the best. Spoken from a true blond. |
| mandy | posted 2-May-2001 9:45pm Yes they are...and that makes me an absolute failure as a woman |
| Julia81 | (reply to cody) posted 2-May-2001 10:34pm i agree with it, it became universal standard. |
| TylersMamma | posted 3-May-2001 1:52am It all depends on personal prefrence. |
| Hotbabe | (reply to mandy) posted 3-May-2001 4:21pm I don't agree with that. |
| Sparky | posted 3-May-2001 5:55pm Definitely! I wouldn't mind getting me some of that. |
| mandy | (reply to Hotbabe) posted 3-May-2001 7:51pm I wish I were you. You are beautiful.... |
| Enheduanna | (reply to mandy) posted 5-May-2001 10:43am A failure as a woman? Puh-leeze! I'd say that having a child certainly counts towards your success as a woman! And lesbians are, like, the experts on women, so the fact that Sue loves you must mean you're pretty damn good at being a woman, too. And nevermind the additional fact that you're *beautiful*! *adding that last little spit-shine finishing touch to her halo* |
| mandy | (reply to Enheduanna) posted 5-May-2001 2:18pm (((((HUG))))) |
| romkey | posted 5-May-2001 9:50pm one of our tour guides in China, a Mr. Lao, tended to go on about Chinese folklore... he was telling us on one ride about the four beautiful women in Chinese history, that is, there were only four women in China who were actually considered beautiful, four women, yes. And these four women were all very beautiful but each woman had one defect; there was one thing about here that was not beautiful. The first woman had big feet. That is, her feet were very large, but she was very beautiful. The second beautiful woman was very beautiful but she had a very bad body odor. anyway I fell asleep before he got to three and four. |
| romkey | (reply to Maarten) posted 5-May-2001 9:50pm no wonder I'm gay, she's kinda scary looking! |
| Enheduanna | (reply to romkey) posted 6-May-2001 7:52pm It must be a gay thing (well, OK, half-gay)! I think she's scary looking, too. Oh wait... |
| anoddoblivion | posted 8-May-2001 8:47pm We have turned it into this. |
| Sparky | posted 9-May-2001 1:21pm Holy crap! How many of you are gays/lesbians?!?!?! |
| ASB | (reply to Sparky) posted 10-May-2001 11:44am Mind your own business I am sure noone wants to talk to you of all people about it since you are so against people being gay and all. |
| Sparky | (reply to ASB) posted 10-May-2001 2:09pm just a simple question |
| confetti | (reply to Sparky) posted 10-May-2001 10:31pm Holy crap! How many of us actually care?!?!?! |
| Sparky | (reply to confetti) posted 11-May-2001 4:00pm ooh ooh! I do! |
| confetti | (reply to Sparky) posted 11-May-2001 6:08pm Uh huh, any good reason why? |
| Sparky | (reply to confetti) posted 11-May-2001 8:45pm I care because you people are effecting this countries future and the way it is viewed as a whole. You are a breading ground for disease. |
| confetti | (reply to Sparky) posted 12-May-2001 2:59pm You're entitled to your opinion, however keep this is mind; I am not gay, but many of my closest friends are. Many of the SC users are, responding to your initial question. And these views of yours won't be widely embraced here. |
| ASB | (reply to jen) posted 14-May-2001 10:31am LOL |
| Sparky | (reply to jen) posted 17-May-2001 4:46pm I realize that I used the wrong spelling of affect, but hey, we're all human, right? |
| Blondebabe | posted 17-May-2001 5:57pm I am blonde, GREEN-eyed, tall, slender, large - breasted, medium skin and I am told daily I am stunning, I stop traffic with my looks and I wouldn't have it any other way. I am similar to Victoria. Anyone who makes negative comments about her is jealous. I've witnessed catty women wherever I go. |
| mandy | (reply to Sparky) posted 17-May-2001 6:31pm That's right. All of us. Maybe you should keep that in mind when handing out harsh judgement of those who are different from you. |
| Sparky | (reply to mandy) posted 18-May-2001 5:46pm being a lesbian is more than a spelling error... |
| mandy | (reply to Sparky) posted 18-May-2001 9:48pm You are so Christlike.... WWJD? Would he say things like that to me? |
| anonymous | posted 19-May-2001 11:36am what does all of this banter have to do with the subject?????????????? |
| Sparky | (reply to mandy) posted 20-May-2001 11:36am probably worse things...more condemning |
| nasale | (reply to bcollins) posted 20-May-2001 5:13pm I beg your pardon. You're right, that was crude. How about crap. Is that better? (Personally, I rather like doo-doo better.)Sigh, I guess, I'm just getting too old to change my nasty ways. In the grand scheme of things, though, there are so many more awful things to be than crude. Smile. Life is great, if you don't constantly smell doo-doo where it isn't. |
| bcollins | (reply to nasale) posted 20-May-2001 5:24pm I just haven't heard an adult use doo-doo in a long time, unless they are talking to a young child. Frankly, your doo-doo remark cracked me up. |
| nasale | (reply to bcollins) posted 20-May-2001 11:32pm Okay, I'll 'fess up' I have to say doo-doo because if my mother finds out I said the 'S' word, I'm in big trouble. She's EVERYWHERE, so I'm not taking any chances. |
| bcollins | (reply to nasale) posted 21-May-2001 1:00am (whispering) i won't say a word. Shhhhh...be vewy vewy qwiet |
| anonymous | (reply to Julia81) posted 21-May-2001 11:20pm That is an untrue comment about the blonde look being in the past. Practically every Playboy Playmate is BLONDE etc... |
| anonymous | (reply to Julia81) posted 21-May-2001 11:21pm Carmen Electra is blonde now too. |
| Brian | posted 25-May-2001 3:32pm (Sigh) After all these years, it still amazes me how women are able to make both attention getting entrances and enchanting exits. A toast to all the lovely ladies from old fashion me. |
| natsim | posted 4-Jun-2001 2:24am In some parts of the world and for some people, this is the standard of physical female beauty. I that standard is changing and I think that's a good thing. |
| natsim | (reply to Sparky) posted 4-Jun-2001 2:28am Oscar, when you make comments like this I wonder if you have ever read the Bible. Where do you get the idea that Jesus would condemn a lesbian and call her something worse than a breeding ground for disease? |
| Cleo | posted 4-Jun-2001 10:02pm Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. |
| Maarten | (reply to natsim) posted 5-Jun-2001 9:31am "Thou shalt condemn all lesbians as they are a breeding ground for disease." - Revelations 4:18 |
| natsim | (reply to Maarten) posted 5-Jun-2001 7:35pm LOL I don't know how I missed that one! |
| Sparky | (reply to natsim) posted 9-Jun-2001 12:17am he wouldn't call her such, he would simply offer punishment |
| Sparky | (reply to Maarten) posted 9-Jun-2001 12:19am cute Who's the hateful one here? "We hate you, Oscar" |
| Sparky | (reply to Maarten) posted 9-Jun-2001 12:20am Reply to Oscar please. |
| Maarten | (reply to Sparky) posted 9-Jun-2001 11:06am I don't hate you. I just think you're stupid. |
| Sparky | (reply to Maarten) posted 10-Jun-2001 2:17pm well, you said it, didn't you? If you meant to say "I think you're stupid," why did you say, "We hate you?" |
| Maarten | (reply to Sparky) posted 10-Jun-2001 3:30pm I didn't. |
| ASB | (reply to Maarten) posted 11-Jun-2001 1:28pm LOL Thats funny |
| Sparky | (reply to Maarten) posted 11-Jun-2001 8:52pm oh, I believe you did though |
| natsim | (reply to Sparky) posted 11-Jun-2001 11:13pm I disagree, he would offer forgiveness. Do you read the Bible? |
| Maarten | (reply to Sparky) posted 12-Jun-2001 5:26am In which survey then? |
| Sparky | (reply to natsim) posted 12-Jun-2001 4:50pm yes forgiveness, but only if it is accepted...otherwise condemnation |
| Sparky | (reply to Maarten) posted 12-Jun-2001 4:50pm Feedback |
| Maarten | (reply to Sparky) posted 12-Jun-2001 7:53pm Pfff... and where in Feedback? Or do you really want me to read back all Feedback entries? |
| natsim | (reply to Sparky) posted 12-Jun-2001 8:18pm Actually, Jesus wouldn't offer forgiveness simply because someone is a lesbian, because it's not needed. I see many lesbian relationships that are as full and loving and life-giving as the best heterosexual relationships, and I don't believe there is any forgiveness needed. Why would it be needed? But, in any circumstance where someone is seeking forgiveness, there is no condemnation. What do you mean when you say that someone might not accept forgiveness? |
| Sparky | (reply to natsim) posted 13-Jun-2001 11:14am Forgiveness is offered to everyone, but not everyone accepts it. Have you ever read Romans 1? That is where heterosexual condemnation is mentioned. What about Sodom and Gomorrha? (please reply to Oscar, not Sparky) |
| Sparky | (reply to Maarten) posted 13-Jun-2001 11:17am http://surveycentral.org/?S=202898&A=Feedback&display=2463 There you go. I'll save your lazy ass the trouble of looking it up. (Please reply to Oscar, not Sparky) |
| natsim | (reply to Sparky) posted 13-Jun-2001 7:08pm (It's not possible to reply to Oscar, because Oscar hasn't commented on this survey yet. If you comment as Oscar, then I can fix it). There's an interesting typo in your question..... Yes, I have read Romans 1 and Sodom and Gomorrah. I think it's impossible to compare the gang rape of Sodom and Gomorrah to a monogamous lesbian relationship. This passage says nothing about gay and lesbian relationships, only about acts of sexual violence, which we agree is abominable. |
| natsim | (reply to Sparky) posted 13-Jun-2001 7:24pm Another quick point on Sodom and Gomorrah: If you look in the Bible for the first reference to Sodom and Gomorrah, you'll find that God had decided to destroy S&G well before the famous interaction with Lot's visitors. The reason God was going to destroy S&G was "she and her daughters had pride, excess of food and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy." (From Ezekiel 16:49) |
If you'd like to vote and/or comment on this survey, please Sign On
| This Month's Best | Best Active | Best Inactive | Pick a Creator | Pick a Category | All |
| New Survey | Replies | Users | Search | Chat | Forum | Feedback | Statistics | Customize | Help |