Sign On
Create Account

Last

TypeCreatedCategoryCreatorSortVotesHidesRating
single30-Jul-2000opinionPollerbear by votes69756.3%

Advanced_Stats

When do you think human life begins?




VotesAnswer
23At conception.
17Other...(please comment)...
16Birth.
1After the 1st trimester.
1After the 2nd trimester.

UserComment
anonymous
posted 30-Jul-2000 3:12am  
Human life begins the second someone even thinks about sex. People who think about sex and then don't go on to procreate are baby killers!!!
they Bronze Star Survey Creator Survey Qualifier
posted 30-Jul-2000 3:24am  
I'm not sure... I've always considered myself to be pro-choice (even though I couldn't go through with it).. but I have read up a little bit on dilation and extraction lately and it makes me sick to my stomach to think about...
jettles Survey Central Gold Subscriber Bronze Star Survey Creator Gold Qualifier
posted 30-Jul-2000 10:00am  
when the baby could survive at birth.....which some would call the 2nd trimester.
jettles Survey Central Gold Subscriber Bronze Star Survey Creator Gold Qualifier
(reply to anonymous) posted 30-Jul-2000 10:01am  
so no sex for pleasure for you!
Jemmy
posted 30-Jul-2000 11:08am  
I really don't care
mandy Gold Qualifier
posted 30-Jul-2000 1:05pm  
sperm meets egg...presto!
Zang
posted 30-Jul-2000 8:00pm  
I was the first to answer this survey, and I was hesitant to make the first comment. Now that there are some others up there I feel more comfortable stating my "politically incorrect" views.

I think that life begins at the moment of conception. However, I don't see where that is any excuse not to exterminate the little maggots on the slightest whim.

I would describe my position in the abortion debate as: "Pro-Death".
Enheduanna Survey Central Subscriber
posted 30-Jul-2000 8:50pm  
I agree with they; I'm not entirely sure where I stand on this issue these days. It's a really grey area. I'm inclined to say it's when the fetus is viable and could survive on it's own, or with minimal help from an incubator or something (since I think premature babies are viable). But then again, that boils down to being largely a political reason. I think it happens some time after conception, but I'm not sure when. And as Zang pointed out, maybe this question shouldn't have anything to do with the abortion debate. (Not that I'd go to quite the extreme he does!)
SueBee Survey Central Subscriber
posted 31-Jul-2000 12:27am  
Before a baby is born there's nobody on earth who knows that baby yet, except for the mother. That's why I think the mother should be able to choose abortion if she feels she won't be able to care properly for the child. I think that is an unfortunate choice, and I'd like to see people learn more about abstinence and birth control so that unwanted pregnancies could be avoided. I think women should also have to have some counseling about the alternatives before going through with an abortion, but ultimately I think each woman should be able to make her own choice. I think abortions should be legal, but very rare.
Richard
posted 31-Jul-2000 1:53am  
Life is eternal.
Maarten
posted 31-Jul-2000 5:23am  
Life starts at conception, as soon as the cells start deviding.
But that does not mean I'm against abortion.
supplicant
posted 31-Jul-2000 8:20am  
Anything from conception to about 20 years old, depending on how I chose to define "human" at that given moment  * smile *
bluebird1974
(reply to Zang) posted 31-Jul-2000 10:08am  
You are a sick puppy!!! Maybe your mother should have been Pro-Death??
daver
posted 31-Jul-2000 10:33am  
I'd be pretty impressed if a dead fertilized egg managed to continue dividing.
natsim
posted 31-Jul-2000 5:20pm  
I think human life began 75,000 years ago or more.

Each human life begins at conception. I don't know what I think about where this question is heading though.
mary
posted 31-Jul-2000 7:59pm  
Definitely at conception.
romkey Survey Central Gold Subscriber
posted 31-Jul-2000 11:22pm  
whenever it's convenient for us to define it to, particularly if the definition supports whatever view we're trying to put forward. I don't think human life is especially important in the context of the way the world works. I think "human life" is an artifical definition we use to describe imperfectly a set of processes we observe.
davec
posted 1-Aug-2000 5:13am  
18 years after birth.
drdt
posted 1-Aug-2000 2:35pm  
Human life does not begin, it continues.
jzp Survey Central Subscriber
posted 2-Aug-2000 9:37pm  
define 'life'. organic chemical reactions happen early on. a LIFE that includes experiences and meaning doesn't happen until after birth.
dab Survey Central Gold Subscriber Gold Qualifier
posted 3-Aug-2000 8:43am  
Well, it appears I was wrong. I've long believed that most people believed human life began sometime between conception and birth but, since there's no bright line event in there, extremists on the issue had polarized discussion. From these results, I learn that the vast majority are at one extreme or the other.
romkey Survey Central Gold Subscriber
(reply to dab) posted 3-Aug-2000 10:20am  
I think the 'bright event' is when the nervous system gets going, which would be some point after it's formed... arguably even at or after birth, depending on what 'gets going' means... it's all just semantics.
joachim
posted 3-Aug-2000 4:36pm  
I guess I tend to think it "begins" when the fetus is viable outside the mother's body, whenever that is (I guess around the second trimester). The thing is, I don't really look at it that way. A fetus is alive, in one sense or another, from the moment of conception. The real question is: how long do we feel comfortable killing it? For me, that's basically until it is independently viable.
joachim
(reply to dab) posted 3-Aug-2000 4:39pm  
If your "extremes" are "conception" and "not conception". I think these results show that there are a lot of ways of looking at the matter, most of them far from extreme.
dab Survey Central Gold Subscriber Gold Qualifier
(reply to joachim) posted 4-Aug-2000 2:11pm  
My extremes were conception and birth. The two intermediate points got 1 vote each. Then there's 'other'. I scanned the comments and didn't find a lot of answers (except yours) that suggested people voted 'other' because they wanted to pick an intermediate point other than 1st or 2nd trimester. So I see 26 people who picked either extreme, 2 who picked a time in between, and 15 who picked something else (that is, basically didn't choose). Even if you include all the 'others' in the non-extremist category, there's still a healthy majority (almost 2 to 1) voting the extremes.
msgman
(reply to dab) posted 4-Aug-2000 3:32pm  
Conception and birth are both logical choices, as they're the main "events" in what is otherwise pretty much a continuum. The concepts of first and second trimester are purely artificial, based on external timescales rather than the development of the unborn child.

Other than conception and birth, the only other non-arbitrary points are implantation and viability. Implantation, though, is too close to conception to be relevant to the abortion debate (although it is relevant to the contraception debate, especially for those with strong religious beliefs), and viability itself depends on external factors - premature babies are now surviving at ever-earlier ages, due to improvements in care. If it ever becomes possible to incubate a baby in an entirely artificial environment all the way from conception, then viability would cease to be much of a meaningful concept.
joachim
(reply to dab) posted 4-Aug-2000 6:15pm  
I guess you're right... I actually answered "at conception". I suppose the problem is that there are two issues - it's biological life versus some kind of conscious life or birth of the soul or something like that. That second concept, which tells us when we are allowed to perform abortions among other things, is very hazy. Since I think there is no bright line like the one you mentioned, when someone says "life" I think "conception". But it's not life in a meaningful way. Maybe another survey could ask "when does a fetus become a human being?"?
jkiehart
posted 9-Aug-2000 2:11pm  
Oh let's not go there, please!
Kris13
posted 10-Aug-2000 8:19pm  
It's hard to explain...sorry
Andyroo
posted 11-Aug-2000 9:58am  
At birth. And for anyone who is "pro life" I'd just like to know why y'all go out and shoot abortion clinic doctors...isn't that rather ironic? It kind of defeats your pro life beliefs.
Pollerbear
(reply to Andyroo) posted 11-Aug-2000 5:19pm  
Oh let's see, about 99.9999999999999999999999999% of the MILLIONS of people who are pro-life DO NOT go out and shoot abortion doctors! A couple of "bad apples" does not defeat the beliefs of the MILLIONS of people who are pro-life.
Andyroo
(reply to Pollerbear) posted 11-Aug-2000 5:27pm  
lol How did I know that that was going to be the response.
No argument there  * smile * I'm so for generalizing
Pollerbear
(reply to Andyroo) posted 11-Aug-2000 8:58pm  
:) How do you do that smiley face? I always thought it was :) but it doesn't work when I do it.
Andyroo
(reply to Pollerbear) posted 11-Aug-2000 9:37pm  
I meant to say that I'm sorry for generalizing. Anyways you do the smiley face by doing : and then - and then ) all together that makes  * smile *
Pollerbear
(reply to Andyroo) posted 11-Aug-2000 11:39pm  
 * smile *
Andyroo
(reply to Pollerbear) posted 12-Aug-2000 10:08am  
There ya go! woo hoo!
kirst
posted 20-Aug-2000 5:48am  
conception
Oscar
posted 29-Aug-2000 1:01pm  
conception
Last
Advanced_Stats

If you'd like to vote and/or comment on this survey, please Sign On

 
Link this survey: http://surveycentral.org/survey/5463.html

Hits: 4 today (15 in the last 30 days)