Sign On
Create Account

Last

TypeCreatedCategoryCreatorSortVotesHidesRating
single14-Jul-2000opinionBlueberryMuffin unsorted721358.3%

Advanced_Stats

Do you think a virus will ultimately be responsible for the destruction of civilisation as we know it?

Follow this link to read one article about the virus Smallpox.
http://wretched.myip.org/



VotesAnswer
11Yes.
39No.
10Other.

UserComment
Analog
posted 15-Jul-2000 6:49am  
No, I think it's more likely that civilization will find some other way to reach its end.
Jemmy
posted 15-Jul-2000 11:38am  
I don't know. Does civilization mean civilized people only? :)
Zang
posted 15-Jul-2000 1:52pm  
No. I didn't follow the link. I think the destruction of civilization as we know it (and it will happen, history demonstrates this) will come as a result of human greed, stupidity, and foolhardy self-confidence. I predict a technological/economic breakdown which will essentially reverse the present state of affairs, so that 3rd world countries will be at the top.
autumnlight
posted 15-Jul-2000 2:25pm  
I actually think it will be a comet or other natural disaster. That volcano under Yellowstone Park is worrying!
jonathan
posted 15-Jul-2000 3:35pm  
Not a biological virus per se, but the virus that is the idea (aka a meme) of human superiority over nature will destroy civilization as we know it in the next 100 years. Some would say it already has, given the huge sociological changes in the industrialized world in the past 150 years.
tophernic
posted 16-Jul-2000 2:13am  
I think the use of biological weapons will be the end of our civilization
bill Survey Central Gold Subscriber Gold Star Survey Creator
posted 16-Jul-2000 8:37am  
I don't think civilization will be destroyed, this time. I think that, this time, we've taken it to a new level. If I had to pick, I'd pick nuclear war over a virus.
Maarten
posted 16-Jul-2000 10:57am  
No way.
mandy
posted 16-Jul-2000 2:51pm  
dunno
cody
posted 16-Jul-2000 5:07pm  
A SINGLE virus, no. No matter how powerfull a virus is, it will either 1) Kill its victims too quickly and fizzle out (Ebola). 2) Have a survival/immunity rate of at least 1:10,000 (Like "HIV" does.).

However... multiple virus might do the trick.
Enheduanna Survey Central Subscriber
posted 16-Jul-2000 10:27pm  
I think civilization as we know it is more likely to be responsible for the destruction of civilization as we know it. Actually, it's more likely that civilization as we don't yet know it will be the cause of the destruction of civilization as we don't yet know it.
Richard
posted 17-Jul-2000 1:47am  
No that's Rickie Lakes job! :)
joachim
(reply to jonathan) posted 17-Jul-2000 10:48am  
On the contrary - the idea of human superiority over nature will destroy nature as we know it over the next 100 years, but we'll survive it. That's precisely what makes us superior to nature.
Maarten
posted 17-Jul-2000 12:31pm  
The AIDS virus by the way is doing a pretty good job wiping out Africa.
ayannahtaylor
posted 17-Jul-2000 3:17pm  
Just look what the Aids virus and Ebola is doing right now, destroying Earth's population, for whom's convenience is the question?
romkey Survey Central Gold Subscriber
(reply to ayannahtaylor) posted 17-Jul-2000 3:33pm  
what is ebola doing right now? I haven't heard about an outbreak in a while...
joachim
(reply to romkey) posted 17-Jul-2000 3:34pm  
I believe it's currently stalking another innocent African village. It's looking for a small town with an international airport.
romkey Survey Central Gold Subscriber
(reply to joachim) posted 17-Jul-2000 4:06pm  
beachfront property would be nice, too.
mandy
(reply to joachim) posted 17-Jul-2000 6:42pm  
 * laughing out loud *
mandy
(reply to joachim) posted 17-Jul-2000 6:44pm  
*frowns* wait...I just realized...everyone blames the Monkies! Poor little Monkies...
I love Monkies...I also love the way I spell Monkies, don't you?

Anyone?
Anyone?
Bueller?
regis
(reply to romkey) posted 19-Jul-2000 2:57am  
ebola is too fast and too nasty to really bring about the end of civilization, plus i don't believe there's been much in the way of airborne strains that kill humans, are there? i know ebola reston was airborne but only killed monkeys, and i'm almost certain that both ebola zaire and ebola d-mumble (some town in germany whose name i've forgotten) were both NON-airborne.

AIDS is too slow and too difficult to catch.

and i don't think either of those or anything in between would actually bring about the end of civilization. civilization is pretty robust.
romkey Survey Central Gold Subscriber
(reply to regis) posted 19-Jul-2000 9:23am  
marburg virus! marburg virus! you're in Seattle - oh noooooo!
supplicant
(reply to mandy) posted 19-Jul-2000 10:28am  
Yeah, why blame them? I mean everybody knows they're too busy singing to get anybody down.
drdt
posted 19-Jul-2000 2:54pm  
Civilization as we know it is destroyed on a regular basis by scientific progress.
mandy
(reply to supplicant) posted 20-Jul-2000 6:05pm  
They're just tryin' to be friendly........
Delirium
posted 21-Jul-2000 4:00am  
We are the virus.
LouLou
posted 26-Jul-2000 8:41am  
I would imagine there will be.
jkiehart
posted 9-Aug-2000 12:56pm  
No.
kirst This user is on the site NOW (7 minutes ago)
posted 29-Aug-2000 2:26am  
Not sure. I couldn't get the link to work.
BlueberryMuffin
(reply to kirst) posted 3-Sep-2000 3:35pm  
I can't seem to either. The site may have gone down. I'll ask him and let you know.
kirst This user is on the site NOW (7 minutes ago)
(reply to BlueberryMuffin) posted 5-Sep-2000 8:29am  
thanks
Last
Advanced_Stats

If you'd like to vote and/or comment on this survey, please Sign On

 
Link this survey: http://surveycentral.org/survey/5348.html

Hits: 1 today (2 in the last 30 days)