| This Month's Best | Best Active | Best Inactive | Pick a Creator | Pick a Category | All |
| New Survey | Replies | Users | Search | Chat | Forum | Feedback | Statistics | Customize | Help |
| Type | Created | Category | Creator | Sort | Votes | Hides | Rating | |
| single | 14-Jul-2000 | opinion | BlueberryMuffin | unsorted | 72 | 13 | 58.3% |
|
| User | Comment |
|---|---|
| Analog | posted 15-Jul-2000 6:49am No, I think it's more likely that civilization will find some other way to reach its end. |
| Jemmy | posted 15-Jul-2000 11:38am I don't know. Does civilization mean civilized people only? :) |
| Zang | posted 15-Jul-2000 1:52pm No. I didn't follow the link. I think the destruction of civilization as we know it (and it will happen, history demonstrates this) will come as a result of human greed, stupidity, and foolhardy self-confidence. I predict a technological/economic breakdown which will essentially reverse the present state of affairs, so that 3rd world countries will be at the top. |
| autumnlight | posted 15-Jul-2000 2:25pm I actually think it will be a comet or other natural disaster. That volcano under Yellowstone Park is worrying! |
| jonathan | posted 15-Jul-2000 3:35pm Not a biological virus per se, but the virus that is the idea (aka a meme) of human superiority over nature will destroy civilization as we know it in the next 100 years. Some would say it already has, given the huge sociological changes in the industrialized world in the past 150 years. |
| tophernic | posted 16-Jul-2000 2:13am I think the use of biological weapons will be the end of our civilization |
| bill | posted 16-Jul-2000 8:37am I don't think civilization will be destroyed, this time. I think that, this time, we've taken it to a new level. If I had to pick, I'd pick nuclear war over a virus. |
| Maarten | posted 16-Jul-2000 10:57am No way. |
| mandy | posted 16-Jul-2000 2:51pm dunno |
| cody | posted 16-Jul-2000 5:07pm A SINGLE virus, no. No matter how powerfull a virus is, it will either 1) Kill its victims too quickly and fizzle out (Ebola). 2) Have a survival/immunity rate of at least 1:10,000 (Like "HIV" does.). However... multiple virus might do the trick. |
| Enheduanna | posted 16-Jul-2000 10:27pm I think civilization as we know it is more likely to be responsible for the destruction of civilization as we know it. Actually, it's more likely that civilization as we don't yet know it will be the cause of the destruction of civilization as we don't yet know it. |
| Richard | posted 17-Jul-2000 1:47am No that's Rickie Lakes job! :) |
| joachim | (reply to jonathan) posted 17-Jul-2000 10:48am On the contrary - the idea of human superiority over nature will destroy nature as we know it over the next 100 years, but we'll survive it. That's precisely what makes us superior to nature. |
| Maarten | posted 17-Jul-2000 12:31pm The AIDS virus by the way is doing a pretty good job wiping out Africa. |
| ayannahtaylor | posted 17-Jul-2000 3:17pm Just look what the Aids virus and Ebola is doing right now, destroying Earth's population, for whom's convenience is the question? |
| romkey | (reply to ayannahtaylor) posted 17-Jul-2000 3:33pm what is ebola doing right now? I haven't heard about an outbreak in a while... |
| joachim | (reply to romkey) posted 17-Jul-2000 3:34pm I believe it's currently stalking another innocent African village. It's looking for a small town with an international airport. |
| romkey | (reply to joachim) posted 17-Jul-2000 4:06pm beachfront property would be nice, too. |
| mandy | (reply to joachim) posted 17-Jul-2000 6:42pm |
| mandy | (reply to joachim) posted 17-Jul-2000 6:44pm *frowns* wait...I just realized...everyone blames the Monkies! Poor little Monkies... I love Monkies...I also love the way I spell Monkies, don't you? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? |
| regis | (reply to romkey) posted 19-Jul-2000 2:57am ebola is too fast and too nasty to really bring about the end of civilization, plus i don't believe there's been much in the way of airborne strains that kill humans, are there? i know ebola reston was airborne but only killed monkeys, and i'm almost certain that both ebola zaire and ebola d-mumble (some town in germany whose name i've forgotten) were both NON-airborne. AIDS is too slow and too difficult to catch. and i don't think either of those or anything in between would actually bring about the end of civilization. civilization is pretty robust. |
| romkey | (reply to regis) posted 19-Jul-2000 9:23am marburg virus! marburg virus! you're in Seattle - oh noooooo! |
| supplicant | (reply to mandy) posted 19-Jul-2000 10:28am Yeah, why blame them? I mean everybody knows they're too busy singing to get anybody down. |
| drdt | posted 19-Jul-2000 2:54pm Civilization as we know it is destroyed on a regular basis by scientific progress. |
| mandy | (reply to supplicant) posted 20-Jul-2000 6:05pm They're just tryin' to be friendly........ |
| Delirium | posted 21-Jul-2000 4:00am We are the virus. |
| LouLou | posted 26-Jul-2000 8:41am I would imagine there will be. |
| jkiehart | posted 9-Aug-2000 12:56pm No. |
| kirst | posted 29-Aug-2000 2:26am Not sure. I couldn't get the link to work. |
| BlueberryMuffin | (reply to kirst) posted 3-Sep-2000 3:35pm I can't seem to either. The site may have gone down. I'll ask him and let you know. |
| kirst | (reply to BlueberryMuffin) posted 5-Sep-2000 8:29am thanks |
If you'd like to vote and/or comment on this survey, please Sign On
| This Month's Best | Best Active | Best Inactive | Pick a Creator | Pick a Category | All |
| New Survey | Replies | Users | Search | Chat | Forum | Feedback | Statistics | Customize | Help |