Sign On
Create Account

Last

TypeCreatedCategoryCreatorSortVotesHidesRating
single21-Mar-2000opinioncookiekid unsorted57949.0%

Advanced_Stats

Do you think subjects such as politics and sociology should be offered as a study option earlier on in schooling?

I am asking this based on my personal experience in Britain(there may be U.S. schools where people can already study these subjects at age 11.)Some aspects of these subjects may cross into subjects like history, but not in depth. Many young children may find these subjects difficult, but when a person starts secondary school (age 11) should they have the chance to study an introductory course in these subjects?
Do you think introducing these subjects at a younger age is a waste of time because children may have no interest, or simply that these subjects are not important?
Or do you think these subjects have as much relevance, if not more relevance, to the world a person leaving school will enter?




VotesAnswer
0They should be compulsory
23People should have the chance to study them earlier
0Just sociology should be offered
0Just politics should be offered
11The system is fine as it is
1They should not be studied at all
5I have no opinion
3Other

UserComment
ILJ
posted 22-Mar-2000 9:37am  
I had to pick Other, since I wanted to pick both the first and second options. Taking Civics out of American curricula was one of the key steps to growing our government into the monster it is today.
SueBee Survey Central Subscriber
posted 24-Mar-2000 1:19pm  
I think it would be fine to offer these subjects at an earlier age if it was presented in a way that would be interesting to the kids. I wonder, though, if there is time to cram in this sort of thing when they are already busy with the basics of reading, writing, and math.
mandy Gold Qualifier
posted 24-Mar-2000 8:15pm  
Oh shut, up you drunk!
*falls over*
drdt
posted 25-Mar-2000 11:53am  
SB: one might argue that the basics of reading, writing, and math are secondary to social sciences. You don't need writing or math to understand your fellow people.
supplicant
posted 25-Mar-2000 11:58am  
SueBee: depends on the student. I was certainly not learning the "basics of reading, writing, and math" at age 11... at age 10 I was correcting the classes Maths homework because the teacher had other things they needed to be doing. I for one would have been glad to have studied something interesting instead of hearing the same stuff I already knew over and over again... who knows, I might have even stayed in school.
SueBee Survey Central Subscriber
posted 25-Mar-2000 1:40pm  
I suppose things do go slow for the smarter kids. I guess we need more programs that provide challenges for the kids who get ahead of others.
Zang
posted 25-Apr-2000 8:10am  
Sure, why not?
Last
Advanced_Stats

If you'd like to vote and/or comment on this survey, please Sign On

 
Link this survey: http://surveycentral.org/survey/3779.html

Hits: 1 today (3 in the last 30 days)