| User | Comment |
|---|
| mandy | | posted 23-Jan-2000 10:10pm |
Jesse Ventura |
| fooyun | | posted 23-Jan-2000 10:28pm |
Martha Stewart. |
| anonymous | | posted 23-Jan-2000 11:18pm |
Forbes, or Keyes |
| jonathan | | posted 24-Jan-2000 8:40am |
I vote that there are no more US presidential election surveys until November 2000. |
they   | | posted 24-Jan-2000 11:05am |
I don't vote. |
| Maarten | | posted 24-Jan-2000 12:18pm |
If I could vote Iīd vote a Democrat. But I donīt know the differences in opinions between Bradley and Gore. |
| jjg | | posted 24-Jan-2000 12:48pm |
I like Steve Forbes this time. His whole platform is the flat tax, but that is what is appealing to me this election year. |
| eris | | posted 24-Jan-2000 2:47pm |
Bleh. I'll probably vote against whoever I like least. |
| robin | | posted 24-Jan-2000 5:45pm |
Malkovich |
| Malkovich | | posted 24-Jan-2000 6:17pm |
Malkovich! |
| lion | | posted 24-Jan-2000 6:37pm |
I wouldn't vote for Malkovich, but I would vote for Malkovich. |
| mandy | | posted 24-Jan-2000 7:33pm |
I like Malk! |
| Enheduanna | | posted 24-Jan-2000 8:41pm |
Malk means "king" in various ancient Semitic dialects! |
| Gamera | | posted 24-Jan-2000 10:59pm |
So he's the King o' the Vich's? The Vich o' the East and the Vich o' the Vest? |
| Enheduanna | | posted 25-Jan-2000 8:28am |
I hope he's not a wicked Vich! |
| jonathan | | posted 25-Jan-2000 11:19am |
Vich vay is it to Albuquerque? |
| Enheduanna | | posted 25-Jan-2000 1:31pm |
Hmmm...maybe Malkovich was behind Vichy France! |
| Malkovich | | posted 25-Jan-2000 1:38pm |
No comment. |
| lion | | posted 25-Jan-2000 3:06pm |
Its neither vich nor vat. |
| gilly | | posted 25-Jan-2000 3:53pm |
Don't be so vichy vachy. |
| Enheduanna | | posted 25-Jan-2000 3:55pm |
Stop your kviching! |
| ILJ | | posted 25-Jan-2000 4:15pm |
I vichy may, I vichy might...oh forget it. |
| mandy | | posted 25-Jan-2000 6:41pm |
My butt viches
*Scratch Scratch* |
romkey  | | posted 26-Jan-2000 8:29am |
son of a vitch... |
| Pomeranian | | posted 26-Jan-2000 6:22pm |
romkey: didn't he write Swamp Thing for awhile? |
| lonxedosol | | posted 27-Jan-2000 10:54am |
Although I still think Perot can bust in and score! |
| romkey | | posted 27-Jan-2000 7:37pm |
Pomeranian - I think that was Stray Toasters |
| pcpr | | posted 29-Jan-2000 5:24pm |
fooyun -- I hope Martha Stewart is never president of USA... she'll force us to clean everything like maniacs and if you don't comply you may find that your house has been subjected to drive-by doilying...  |
| jzp | | posted 30-Jan-2000 8:35am |
None of the above. Voting encourages the politicians and signals that I buy into thei supposedly free system.
The only time voting makes any difference in America is at the local level. All other votes are a waste of time and energy.
"Formerly the master selected the slave; today the slave selects his master." --Albert Parsons |
| phi | | posted 30-Jan-2000 11:28am |
jzp: you know, you can vote without voting for a republicrat. I voted for the trotskyist in a senatorial election not too long ago, and I think the fact that said trotskyist polled 2% of the vote -- enough that the eventual winner (feinstein) came out with only a plurality -- sent a message that was stronger than just poor turnout. |
| jzp | | posted 30-Jan-2000 5:00pm |
phi: you mistake my distaste for 'the system' to mean the two-party circus. While certain reforms certainly could make individual votes more meaningful, I do not swallow representative models, let alone representatives selection by the tyranny of the majority. There is no way to participate in the voting charade and signal an anarchist stance. Monkeywrenching the voting booth, however... |
| angy | | posted 18-Feb-2000 10:10am |
marilyn manson |
| mandy | | posted 18-Feb-2000 7:43pm |
*big grin* |
| mary |
ME definitely ME |
