| This Month's Best | Best Active | Best Inactive | Pick a Creator | Pick a Category | All |
| New Survey | Replies | Users | Search | Chat | Forum | Feedback | Statistics | Customize | Help |
| Type | Created | Category | Creator | Sort | Votes | Hides | Rating | |
| multiple | 24-Jan-2009 | opinion | gambler | by votes | 46 | 4 | 61.6% |
|
|
| User | Comment |
|---|---|
| Cain | posted 25-Jan-2009 3:29pm Geek and loner. Great fun. |
| JessicaWoman99 | posted 25-Jan-2009 4:03pm I was the most popular retarded slut in high school and hated by everybody |
| Galomorro | posted 25-Jan-2009 4:43pm Loner. |
| llamamama | posted 25-Jan-2009 5:01pm Just to throw it out there..You go to high school when you're 18 too..
But according to this I'm counting 6-11 grade..and..that's a big gap..and I don't think I'm the same as I was in middle school. I'm probably the under achiever and the class joker.. |
| Crayons | posted 25-Jan-2009 5:12pm Loner. Weirdo. I have few friends, but I don't really mind so much. The only time I do is when a teacher says for us to pick partners, or if I have to be alone at a lunch table for a semester. In that case, I try to have "props." Props are people who I talk to, but have nothing in common with and don't get any enjoyment out of. They're only with me for those purposes. Often there is nothing to talk about, just awkward silences.
I can't say if I'm an underachiever or not, right now. I have my Algebra 2, and I'm not a math person. I'm in an advanced class or something like that, because I simply always have been, but I've been just good enough to stay in it. I don't really put a lot of effort into the parts I don't get, I just hope that the lesson will blow over and that we will have an easier lesson the next day. Blah. However, when a subject requires something art related, even a powerpoint presentation, I overachieve and make it a work of art. Or, if it's a writing assignment in which I am allowed to drain my innermost thoughts, feelings, or opinions. Then I go overboard. |
| southernyankee | posted 25-Jan-2009 6:00pm Good, for the most part. Middle school I was a huge class clown, but eventually got into so much trouble that I didn't have much choice. I was still a bit of an underachiver though. |
| llamamama | (reply to Crayons) posted 25-Jan-2009 6:03pm That sounds like me. With the math, I try..but maybe not as hard as I could to fully get it..But I just tell myself it's because I don't understand. But anything creative I go all out. |
| LJD | posted 25-Jan-2009 7:08pm An average student of my time. In high school, or in junior high, I wasn't in a clique, nor a loner. My friends, didn't drink or smoke, and no drugs. I had an older boyfriend in my freshman year, Joe, and he was a good man, he was European (German/Hungarian). No drugs, no smoking, very light on the alcohol. He was a gentleman, knew how to treat a woman.
In my day, that I can remember, there were the jocks, the clique, and the average students...no other groups...no gangs, no thugs...no big problems. |
| Melf | posted 25-Jan-2009 7:38pm Geek, victim, a and not the class joker, teacher's pet in the subjects I liked.
In high school, I was kind of an embarrassment... in college, I try to use that to my advantage. |
| paulyw | posted 25-Jan-2009 8:44pm I was mostly quiet |
| LindaH | posted 25-Jan-2009 9:29pm Average. Little bit nerdy, but underacheiver. Mostly jut blended in without fitting in. |
| cloudhugger | posted 25-Jan-2009 11:30pm Jock
I was in or involved in many sports. Geek/Nerd Yes, my freshman year and part of my sophmore year I was quite the nerd. Bully I kicked ass. Loner Very much, even in a crowd. Stoner The was the point, wasn't it? Class Joker Yes, indeed. Brainiac We called us Bomars back then. I was in all the excellerated classes. The crowd Ihung out with amazed me with the crap they learned compared to the stuff I learned. Their homework was a joke compared to mine. I'm glad I had the excellerated. dog I'd say I leaned more towards 'jerk'. I did some stupid crap and hurt others feelings. Tough guy Yeah, I kicked ass, or should I say, I could have but didn't have to. |
| JohnCD | posted 25-Jan-2009 11:51pm I was a little more quiet in high school, but certainly not a loner. During the second half of my junior year, I started hanging around the wrong crowd, but managed to stay out of trouble. I received good grades and didn't fail any classes. |
| kirst | posted 26-Jan-2009 3:52am Feel like there should be a link to "The Breakfast Club". I was probably many of these labels (and yet none of them). The ones I selected were Jock, Nerd, Loner, Brainiac, Under Achiever and Over Achiever. It was complicated. If I could make my own label it would be: Oblivious. I was also bored by a lot of the coursework, didn't see the point of a lot of the crap that went on socially and wasn't in a very happy place during those years. Fortunately I came into my own at college when I met many like-minded people. |
| jettles | posted 26-Jan-2009 5:26am i was in all of the advanced classes but was at the mid to low end of those classes, i was also a jock but not with the elite jock crowd so although i was on the fringes of a few groups i was mostly a loner!! |
| Matty | posted 26-Jan-2009 8:17am I was a popular, jock, honors-student type. |
| gambler | (reply to Matty) posted 26-Jan-2009 10:09am > I was a popular, jock, honors-student type.
Bastard! |
| bill | posted 26-Jan-2009 11:21am I was in A/V! I actually "lettered" in A/V... though, honestly, it was just a place to hang out away from all the annoying crap. I barely did anything A/V related, didn't even have the big keychain. |
| FauxLo | posted 26-Jan-2009 2:14pm |
| cantilever | posted 26-Jan-2009 9:58pm Really, just one of the crowd. Also someone who put a real value on study. A bit of a social retard. |
| gambler | posted 27-Jan-2009 8:00am Under-achiever, popular and big class joker |
| they | posted 27-Jan-2009 8:40am |
| cerealkiller | posted 28-Jan-2009 7:02pm Loner rock star. I was the local lead guitar wizard of the 60's. My friends were all at least 3-4 years older than I was, so as a freshman my friends were seniors (other band members) |
| Kristal_Rose | posted 29-Jan-2009 4:57am I took secret pride in being a chameleon actually, and thus selected all these:
Popular, Jock, Geek/Nerd, Loner, Stoner, Teacher's Pet, Brainiac, Under-achiever, Retard, Slut, Goth (It was punk back then). The groups I hung out in would have been aghast to know that I also hung out with several others they were adverse to. My groups included: French Club socialites, War/Fantasy gamers with much Monty Python and Dr. Demento, Getting stoned camping in parks with hard rockers, Disco w/ attire, X-Country and pole-vaulting jock, and the Punk scene. I didn't have time for math club or ski bunnies, or I could have pulled that off too. Killer Queen and The way you do the things you do were amongst my songs of the time. Heck, eventually I changed my gender, and drew in hillbillies, presidential advisors, the homeless, spiritual leaders, COOs, street gypsies, lawyers, professors. The two main organizations I never did get involved in were the hospital care and team sports scenes. If I'm lucky I'll marry the gal next door. Those are her two main things. Even in college now I tend to fluctuate between F and A+++, though that's more of a matter of conflict of egos. |
| Psychopath | posted 2-Feb-2009 9:58am I can't really recall...so I guess I must have been the stoner |
| Joanne | posted 8-Feb-2009 2:27pm I could find only one thing - under achiever. You don't really have me on your list. Because of an obsessive interest in parapsychology and psychology - from early on I was known as the school's witchdoctor. If I could tie those things in with my homework, I got an A. I took all science courses. Same with classmates - I was funny and smart, very interested in them (kept doing research on 'em), and weird enough to entertain them so I was welcome in every group. Not a leader, not a follower, not ostracized, not establishment. I kept myself in the middle so I could see both ends. |
| Kristal_Rose | (reply to Joanne) posted 10-Feb-2009 12:02am Sounds like you too played the chameleon spy role. |
| Joanne | (reply to Kristal_Rose) posted 10-Feb-2009 12:38am Like you, I found it wasn't that hard to do. I knew I was being more true to myself than if I'd picked a group and was exclusive. I didn't like that at all, that exclusivity, hate it. I despise cliques. It could have worked against me and made me reclusive, but I enjoy people way too much and like hearing their stories, what makes 'em tick and all that. I don't blend, sure didn't in high school, and I don't now, but I'm a happy oddity. My personality type makes up 2% of the population, so I'm told - maybe you're the other 1/50. Glad to meet you! |
| Kristal_Rose | (reply to Joanne) posted 10-Feb-2009 3:27am With shoes like that, how could I resist? |
| Joanne | (reply to Kristal_Rose) posted 10-Feb-2009 10:02am |
If you'd like to vote and/or comment on this survey, please Sign On
| This Month's Best | Best Active | Best Inactive | Pick a Creator | Pick a Category | All |
| New Survey | Replies | Users | Search | Chat | Forum | Feedback | Statistics | Customize | Help |