| User | Comment |
|---|
Iseult  | | posted 28-Jul-2008 7:26pm |
Heath Ledger's got nothing on Jack Nicholson. |
Melf    | | posted 28-Jul-2008 7:28pm |
I just came back from this a minute ago. I never saw the Tim Burton films, but look at the state of the neat guy. S'gotta be Ledger. |
| llamamama | | posted 28-Jul-2008 7:56pm |
I think he's more terrifying when he's neat..So, ''scruffy'' |
Crayons  | | posted 28-Jul-2008 8:43pm |
I'm in love with the scruffy guy but I have to say, he's not quite the Joker. He's completely different. But love is bliiind. I wouldn't have it any other way. |
bill    | | posted 28-Jul-2008 8:44pm |
don't forget...
 |
gambler  | | posted 28-Jul-2008 10:42pm |
neat one.......... but to be fair I havent seen the new movie |
| Strider | | (reply to bill) posted 28-Jul-2008 11:45pm |
> don't forget...
>
defenitly the best of the three
|
| ScubaScott | | posted 29-Jul-2008 12:49am |
Medium Rare |
| LJD | | posted 29-Jul-2008 7:12am |
Neat one |
| moviesnob | | posted 29-Jul-2008 8:08am |
You can't beat Heath Ledger. He kicked way too much ass. |
| Jody | | posted 29-Jul-2008 9:27am |
I kind of liked the original one (Cesar Romero). |
| romkey | | posted 29-Jul-2008 9:38am |
I thought that Jack Nicholson's Joker was a waste of time... he was a clown... not threatening, not scary. Mostly he pranced about like he was looking for motivation. It was very disappointing; when I'd heard Nicholson was cast as the Joker it sounded great.
Ledger's Joker was fantastic. It's difficult to talk about his performance separately from his death, but he made the Joker believable, more than a comic book character. |
| Melf | | posted 29-Jul-2008 9:48am |
I was reading about this earlier - Nicholson hated the idea of Ledger as the Joker, but just because he hadn't been asked. He didn't even think he was going to go and see it. Knob. |
| dilfreak | | posted 29-Jul-2008 11:49am |
Heath Ledger's version is the best. The Dark Knight is by far the best Batman movie made as well as the best superhero movie in general. I loved it so much. The darkness accurately portrays the true Batman. |
| Enheduanna | | posted 29-Jul-2008 12:04pm |
Shaken, not stirred. |
| Irene007 | | posted 29-Jul-2008 12:51pm |
Scruffy makes him look less like a parody of an insane person. |
| Pomeranian | | posted 30-Jul-2008 3:50am |
I don't really have a vivid memory of Nicholson's Joker. I probably didn't hate it, but I am certain that I will never forget Ledger's interpretation, which was amazing. |
| Cain | | posted 30-Jul-2008 6:32am |
I think the neat Joker is closer to the one that was originally intended by the creators of the character. Personally though, I prefer the scruffy one.
I can't remember where I read it - possibly on here somewhere - but it appeals to me that the Ledger joker is a terrorist in the truest sense of the word (i.e - not motivated by money or fame, but out of sheer desire for destruction). I think it makes him a far better villain. The Nicholson Joker was kinda funny, but had no real substance.
Going to see the film tomorrow - I don't think I have ever anticipated a movie so much - I hope it's good! |
| Matty | | posted 30-Jul-2008 11:27am |
The scruffy one seems more believable as a lunatic criminal. |
| cloudhugger | | posted 30-Jul-2008 3:08pm |
Other. I would like to see the movie. Still pictures do not truly bring out the character enough, which adds to the visual appearance. |
| JessicaWoman99 | | posted 30-Jul-2008 10:39pm |
I prefer the neat Joker "winks" |
| judgescratch | | posted 31-Jul-2008 10:09pm |
The neat one is closer to the joker from the TV show. The scruffy one, I'm like, WTF? |
| docgbrown |
Meah |
| Danger |
I prefer the scruffy one, but I enjoyed the neat one too. |
| jindalmeenakshi9 |
the scruffy one are confusing to my thoughts |
| rustygirl50 |
THE MESSY ONE LOOKS SO EVIL. BUT I LOVE JACK NICKELSON THE BEST.HA HA HA HA HA HA HA |
| justjulie | | posted 16-Aug-2008 8:42am |
i prefer him medium rare w/ some sauteed shrooms |
