| This Month's Best | Best Active | Best Inactive | Pick a Creator | Pick a Category | All |
| New Survey | Replies | Users | Search | Chat | Forum | Feedback | Statistics | Customize | Help |
| Type | Created | Category | Creator | Sort | Votes | Hides | Rating | |
| essay | 3-Jul-2008 | politics/religion | aquawolfy | by votes | 37 | 3 | 55.4% |
| User | Comment |
|---|---|
Frostbrand  | posted 4-Jul-2008 1:21pm |
Galomorro   | posted 4-Jul-2008 1:30pm Sounds dangerous to the environment to me, without really studying it or reading up on it. |
Enheduanna  | posted 4-Jul-2008 1:36pm Bad, bad, bad. |
| Matty | posted 4-Jul-2008 1:41pm I don't really know enough to comment in a reasonable way; yes, I did look at the aricles, but only in a cursory way. |
| cloudhugger | posted 4-Jul-2008 1:52pm It's wrong. Prehaps the Americans will benefit for less than ten years, but the environmental impact of destruction may not appear for possible 30 years from now. |
bill    | posted 4-Jul-2008 1:54pm As I understand it, it's a pretty stupid idea that wont help us in the short run and in the long run wont matter much.
I think Oil companies are just trying to make a land grab when we're all upset over fuel prices, so they can squeeze a few more billion dollars out of their business. I've heard they already have access to a lot of off-shore areas, but haven't developed them. The amount of oil that could potentially be extracted isn't enough to make a difference in the price or even the amount of time we'll be able to sustain an oil-based economy. On the other hand, the environmental damage it will cause could potentially be devastating. The reason they don't have access now is because of past problems they caused. |
| southernyankee | posted 4-Jul-2008 5:27pm I'd rather that we drill in the Gulf Coast first. That be the best starting point if anything. I think drilling in general should be only something that should be done as a last resort (eg: in case WW3 breaks out, or gas starts to cost $8.00 / gal). |
| ausfox | posted 4-Jul-2008 6:59pm - |
| JessicaWoman99 | posted 4-Jul-2008 9:26pm Bush should drill in Washington for oil he might get lucky "giggles" |
| dab | posted 4-Jul-2008 9:30pm When we start drilling our own oil, it should be in conjunction with a serious program to start putting alternative energy sources into use. The understanding must be that it's only a short-term stopgap measure. However, as I understand it, other countries are currently drilling off our shores. We're idiots to let them be the only ones. |
| JessicaWoman99 | posted 4-Jul-2008 9:32pm Welcome JessicaWoman99
Sign Off What's New UnQualified This Year's Best This Month's Favorite Completed My Active New Survey Replies Users Search Chat Forum Feedback Statistics Customize Help Oh George Bush how boring you are and glad to see you leave whaaaaaa 1 of 290 Next Type Created Category Creator Sort Votes Hides Rating essay 3-Jul-2008 politics/religion aquawolfy by votes 12 0 50.0% New_Comments Change_Vote Advanced_Stats Hide / Bookmark What is your opinion on Bush's proposal to start offshore drilling in Alaska and California's coast? http://www.newsweek.com/id/142343 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/19/washington/19dri... User Comment Survey Creator reply Frostbrand posted 4-Jul-2008 11:21am Score: 1 (quoted) reply -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It won't do any good; gas prices won't go down, that oil wil go on the global market so we won't get any of it anyway if China has a better offer, it'll only had to the enviromentla damage we've already caused... We use 25% of the world's oil, but we only have something like 12% of the reserves. Even if we drille dourselves into oblivion it still wouldn't be enough. For the Bush/McCain/Retard plan to work it would require us to somehow magically have at least twice as much oil as we do. Put a drill through every caribou in the world and it won't make a lick of difference. We need to get off oil, and we need to do it yesterday. Galomorro posted 4-Jul-2008 11:30am Score: 0 (quoted) reply -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sounds dangerous to the environment to me, without really studying it or reading up on it. Enheduanna posted 4-Jul-2008 11:36am Score: 0 (quoted) reply -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bad, bad, bad. Matty posted 4-Jul-2008 11:41am Score: 0 (quoted) reply -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I don't really know enough to comment in a reasonable way; yes, I did look at the aricles, but only in a cursory way. cloudhugger posted 4-Jul-2008 11:52am Score: 0 (quoted) reply -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It's wrong. Prehaps the Americans will benefit for less than ten years, but the environmental impact of destruction may not appear for possible 30 years from now. bill posted 4-Jul-2008 11:54am Score: 0 (quoted) reply -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- As I understand it, it's a pretty stupid idea that wont help us in the short run and in the long run wont matter much. I think Oil companies are just trying to make a land grab when we're all upset over fuel prices, so they can squeeze a few more billion dollars out of their business. I've heard they already have access to a lot of off-shore areas, but haven't developed them. The amount of oil that could potentially be extracted isn't enough to make a difference in the price or even the amount of time we'll be able to sustain an oil-based economy. On the other hand, the environmental damage it will cause could potentially be devastating. The reason they don't have access now is because of past problems they caused. southernyankee posted 4-Jul-2008 3:27pm Score: 0 (quoted) reply -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'd rather that we drill in the Gulf Coast first. That be the best starting point if anything. I think drilling in general should be only something that should be done as a last resort (eg: in case WW3 breaks out, or gas starts to cost $8.00 / gal). ausfox posted 4-Jul-2008 4:59pm Score: 1 (quoted) reply -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - No more Bush whaaaa JessicaWoman99 posted 4-Jul-2008 7:26pm Score: 0 edit/delete (quoted) reply -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bush should drill in Washington for oil he might get lucky "giggles" Comment: Check comment private Reply To: (use checkboxes next to above comments) Emoticons and Mark-Up Codes Survey rating: good *No Opinion* bad(what you think of this survey) (Click Submit to enter your vote or comment) Next Next New 1 of 290 Change_Vote Advanced_Stats Hide / Bookmark Link this survey: http://surveycentral.org/survey/29473.html Hits: 49 today (61 in the last 30 days) Blame it on Bush What's New UnQualified This Year's Best This Month's Favorite Completed My Active New Survey Replies Users Search Chat Forum Feedback Statistics Customize Help Blame it on Bush Copyright © 1996-2008 Kenyon Hill LLC. All rights reserved. Advertise on this site - Take our Poll - Privacy Statement - Subscribe - Donate - RSS |
| kcthedog | posted 4-Jul-2008 11:59pm I believe that the USA needs to be energy self-sufficient, environmentally issues withstanding, but we cannot allow other political agendas to regulate or control our economic engine. I think that we should have taken Iraq as the fifty-first state! If we were not such pussies and just took the spoils of war, gas would not be at $4.56 a friggin gallon! (This has to be worth one comment!)
|
they  | posted 5-Jul-2008 9:02am I think the fact that this piece of dog crap hasn't been assassinated is proof that the presidents who have were done in by their own government. |
| cloudhugger | (reply to they) posted 5-Jul-2008 11:06am  |
| JessicaWoman99 | (reply to they) posted 5-Jul-2008 2:24pm > I think the fact that this piece of dog crap hasn't been assassinated
> is proof that the presidents who have were done in by their own government. I doubt it anybody could ever get close enough to Bush and security is tight tight |
| JessicaWoman99 | (reply to kcthedog) posted 5-Jul-2008 2:33pm > I believe that the USA needs to be energy self-sufficient, environmentally
> issues withstanding, but we cannot allow other political agendas to > regulate or control our economic engine. I think that we should have > taken Iraq as the fifty-first state! If we were not such pussies and > just took the spoils of war, gas would not be at $4.56 a friggin > gallon! (This has to be worth one comment!) > > That will be the day dream on America will always rely on foreign energy , John McCain is talking about building nuclear power plants it will never happen we are all big dreamers is all just no place at all to dispose of nuclear waste How is that for a comment ? |
| Psychologo | posted 5-Jul-2008 3:43pm We can be looking for quick ways tto solve problems specially if those solutions will just cause new problems in the future by damiging the envierment |
| kcthedog | (reply to JessicaWoman99) posted 5-Jul-2008 5:08pm I personally did not like it, but that is just me. |
| midagehippie | posted 5-Jul-2008 8:10pm he's a jackass and he refuses to deal with the energy crisis the way it needs to be dealt with...we could, years ago, and can now, break our dependency on oil with alternative energies, but he and his family are too tied to oil and oil money to care enough...he is way out of touch...he refuses to deal with this depression his admin calls a "slight downturn in the economy"...he's an ass! He may well be leading us into the predicted "end of America". |
| JessicaWoman99 | (reply to kcthedog) posted 5-Jul-2008 8:56pm > I personally did not like it, but that is just me.
Well at least one thing I am getting used to buying $40.00 worth of gas for my car and over $100.00 for groceries just have to think ahead of time |
| JessicaWoman99 | (reply to Psychologo) posted 5-Jul-2008 9:02pm > We can be looking for quick ways tto solve problems specially if those
> solutions will just cause new problems in the future by damiging the > envierment Yes like nuclear power plants John McCain is proposing for the future instead of natural gas power plants and this will create another problem? Where are they going to get rid of all that nuclear waste it is about the environment and global pollution |
| dimedota06 | posted 5-Jul-2008 11:27pm I don't really care as long as I don't have to be apart of...it I'm good. |
| Psychologo | (reply to JessicaWoman99) posted 6-Jul-2008 12:48am Your right and i ment to say we "cant" not can, that was my bad |
| JessicaWoman99 | (reply to Psychologo) posted 6-Jul-2008 1:54pm > Your right and i meant to say we "can't" not can, that was my bad
Oh and now I see but that is alright and i have spell check on my computer, it does not miss anything I just looked at (Auto Fix) ? and all is good no errors plus I can fix your mistakes as well |
| JessicaWoman99 | (reply to midagehippie) posted 6-Jul-2008 1:56pm > he's a jackass and he refuses to deal with the energy crisis the way
> it needs to be dealt with...we could, years ago, and can now, break > our dependency on oil with alternative energies, but he and his family > are too tied to oil and oil money to care enough...he is way out of > touch...he refuses to deal with this depression his admin calls a > "slight downturn in the economy"...he's an ass! He may well be leading > us into the predicted "end of America". Bush is from Texas is why? what do you think we have a hick oilman for President |
| jettles | posted 6-Jul-2008 10:53pm it's bullcrap, he really has never spent anytime on endorsing or initiating research into alternate sources of fuel! he is an idiot plain and simple! |
| icurok | posted 7-Jul-2008 12:29pm This is what I think of Bush's proposal.
We won't run out of oil anytime soon, but we have run out of cheap oil. Time to kick the habit. |
| docgbrown | posted 7-Jul-2008 1:59pm Fine |
| Zang | posted 7-Jul-2008 10:32pm I couldn't possibly be any less interested. |
| Cain | posted 9-Jul-2008 2:42pm Will it stop the cost of oil rising? Anything for a break, we're up to £1.35 a litre for fuel here ($2.70). |
| Frostbrand | (reply to Cain) posted 9-Jul-2008 4:02pm > Will it stop the cost of oil rising?
Not until about 2013, and only by a few cents a gallon. |
| Cain | (reply to Frostbrand) posted 9-Jul-2008 5:33pm Ah poo. So much for my planned long drive in the country next weekend then! |
| cerealkiller | posted 10-Jul-2008 6:30pm Go for it. |
| aquawolfy | (reply to Cain) posted 17-Jul-2008 5:22pm psh thats nothing! It's like $4.80 over here!! |
| Melf | (reply to aquawolfy) posted 17-Jul-2008 5:55pm I seriously doubt it. I think you must be thinking in gallons.
£1.35 UK sterling translates as $2.70 That's $2.70 per litre. That's $10.22 per US gallon.* Fuel prices are much higher in the UK. I think I've got the maths right. |
| aquawolfy | (reply to Melf) posted 17-Jul-2008 5:57pm k then.  I think i'd still rather live in the UK than here..... |
| Melf | (reply to aquawolfy) posted 17-Jul-2008 6:07pm Really? We have naff weather. And bad teeth. |
| Cain | (reply to aquawolfy) posted 17-Jul-2008 7:40pm Per litre or per gallon? |
| Cain | (reply to Melf) posted 17-Jul-2008 7:40pm Speak for yourself - I have lovely teeth!! |
| Cain | (reply to Melf) posted 17-Jul-2008 7:41pm You're right about the weather though........ |
| aquawolfy | (reply to Melf) posted 18-Jul-2008 5:46pm I LOVE rain!!!!!!!! And I have bad teeth!!!! It's perfect!!!!
 |
| aquawolfy | (reply to Cain) posted 18-Jul-2008 5:52pm gallon |
| Melf | (reply to aquawolfy) posted 18-Jul-2008 6:02pm  |
| aquawolfy | (reply to Melf) posted 18-Jul-2008 6:09pm |
| Cain | (reply to aquawolfy) posted 19-Jul-2008 5:50am So the UK is much more expensive than the US.....
I miss my long drives in the country! |
| Melf | (reply to Cain) posted 19-Jul-2008 5:59am Bah! |
If you'd like to vote and/or comment on this survey, please Sign On
| This Month's Best | Best Active | Best Inactive | Pick a Creator | Pick a Category | All |
| New Survey | Replies | Users | Search | Chat | Forum | Feedback | Statistics | Customize | Help |
Copyright © 1996-2010 Kenyon Hill LLC. All rights reserved.
Take our Poll - Privacy Statement - Feedback - 
We use 25% of the world's oil, but we only have something like 12% of the reserves. Even if we drille dourselves into oblivion it still wouldn't be enough. For the Bush/McCain/Retard plan to work it would require us to somehow magically have at least twice as much oil as we do. Put a drill through every caribou in the world and it won't make a lick of difference. We need to get off oil, and we need to do it yesterday.