Survey CentralSign On
Create Account

This Month's BestBest ActiveBest InactivePick a CreatorPick a CategoryAll
New SurveyRepliesUsersSearchChatForumFeedbackStatisticsCustomizeHelp


Last

Type Created Category Creator Sort Votes Hides Rating
multiple21-Jun-2008possessionsJessicaWoman99 Silver Star Survey Creatorby votes40659.7%

  Would you ever build your: (dream home) in an area that is prone to wildfires and/or earthquakes floods?



VotesAnswer
21No
10Yes
3Something to say
1Depending on insurance

UserComment
bill Survey Central Gold SubscriberTriple Gold Star Survey CreatorThis user is on the site NOW (8 minutes and 18 seconds ago)
posted 22-Jun-2008 8:22pm  

I prefer volcano-prone areas.
Galomorro Gold Star Survey CreatorGold Qualifier
posted 22-Jun-2008 8:26pm  

Of course. Same as people who live in areas that are prone to hurricanes (and tornadoes) -- they take chances too because they like living there so much.
llamamama
posted 22-Jun-2008 9:58pm  

You mean, would I ever build my dream home in California? No.
LindaH Survey Central Gold SubscriberGold Star Survey CreatorSurvey Qualifier
posted 22-Jun-2008 10:06pm  

Yes. I live in Alaska. If I build a house, it would be here.
JessicaWoman99 Silver Star Survey Creator
posted 22-Jun-2008 10:24pm  

No I would never build my dream home where it can get wiped out by mother nature like Ilinois or California
seems dumb and stupid
JessicaWoman99 Silver Star Survey Creator
(reply to Galomorro) posted 22-Jun-2008 10:26pm  

> Of course. Same as people who live in areas that are prone to hurricanes
> (and tornadoes) -- they take chances too because they like living
> there so much.

And they just rebuild and rebuild over and over again , i would grow tired of having to rebuild again
Galomorro Gold Star Survey CreatorGold Qualifier
(reply to JessicaWoman99) posted 22-Jun-2008 10:38pm  

Yeah, I know they do. Their insurance premiums must be unbelievable.
JessicaWoman99 Silver Star Survey Creator
(reply to Galomorro) posted 22-Jun-2008 11:43pm  

> Yeah, I know they do. Their insurance premiums must be unbelievable.

I guess they can afford to rebuild in today's economy and with plenty of help available why not
kcthedog Survey Central Gold SubscriberBronze Star Survey Creator
posted 23-Jun-2008 12:21am  

Yes, I would not let something like a stupid wild fire, earthquake or flood stop me from my dream.
Melf Survey Central SubscriberBronze Star Survey CreatorGold Qualifier
posted 23-Jun-2008 2:54am  

Hell no! I want a library in my dream home. Libraries and wild fires do not mix. Or they mix too well.
jettles Survey Central SubscriberGold Qualifier
posted 23-Jun-2008 9:22am  

no, just in an area prone to hurricanes! there is always something threatening no matter where you pick.........
Enheduanna Survey Central Subscriber
posted 23-Jun-2008 11:48am  

Yes. I live in California, which is prone to both wildfires and earthquakes, and I would build my dream home here. If I could afford it.
Iseult Silver Star Survey CreatorSurvey Qualifier
posted 23-Jun-2008 12:09pm  

I don't know... depends... how good is my job?
Melf Survey Central SubscriberBronze Star Survey CreatorGold Qualifier
posted 23-Jun-2008 1:12pm  

Neat survey.
cerealkiller Bronze Star Survey CreatorGold Qualifier
posted 23-Jun-2008 5:46pm  

Earthquakes are a given here. Wildfires - you just have to plan smart. Floods - no way.
stellarlove21
posted 23-Jun-2008 8:25pm  

Heck no! Building your home in a disaster-prone area is just asking for trouble. For example, why do people continuously build houses right on the beach in areas that are hit with hurricanes constantly? I know they usually have insurance for their houses, but wouldn't it be so much easier to not lose your house again and again?
Kristal_Rose Survey Central Gold SubscriberBronze Star Survey CreatorSurvey Qualifier
posted 23-Jun-2008 11:04pm  

Not likely, but landslides and ocean storms are risks in places I favor. I suppose fires and earthquakes are possible anywhere here in california too, but that part I can overcome with quality architecture.

Perhaps I can have an emergency hydrogen balloon eject in case of a landslide. I was planning to build mostly underground though on a southern sun facing hill.
judgescratch
posted 24-Jun-2008 8:19am  

I don't really believe in building new homes. I probablly will never do it. We're populating so quickly, and building so many new homes in areas which were once open, I just believe in "recycling" a home which is already built.
So no.
kirst
posted 24-Jun-2008 4:17pm  

Probably not...I tend to associate wildfires & earthquakes in the US with California and I have little desire to live there. I would build a house in a potential hurricane/flooding zone, though, as I would want my dream house to be on the coast. We currently have a condo on the beach in Florida which is in a hurricane/flooding zone and the insurance for the place can be a hassle. It's been cancelled before and then we had to scramble to find new coverage. There are less and less companies that want to insure property in areas where natural disasters are likely to occur.


Our place in Thailand (which we have since sold) is in a tsunami zone. Our beach there was affected by the Boxing Day Tsunami and a bunch of stuff was washed away (including a few people) but our place suffered minimal damage.
cloudhugger Survey Central SubscriberGold Star Survey CreatorSurvey Qualifier
posted 24-Jun-2008 7:26pm  

No
cloudhugger Survey Central SubscriberGold Star Survey CreatorSurvey Qualifier
(reply to kirst) posted 24-Jun-2008 7:28pm  

Cool sign. I wonder if it is prone to pick pockets?
kirst
(reply to cloudhugger) posted 24-Jun-2008 10:00pm  

I don't think so...I think people want the sign up so that everyone is aware of the hazard zone. The sign was located across the street from our place in Phuket.
cloudhugger Survey Central SubscriberGold Star Survey CreatorSurvey Qualifier
(reply to kirst) posted 25-Jun-2008 8:45am  

If you sneak over there and nab it for me (secret santa) will they replace it promptly enogh?
kirst
(reply to cloudhugger) posted 25-Jun-2008 10:23am  

No idea! It would be kind of hard to smuggle out in my luggage, though!
cloudhugger Survey Central SubscriberGold Star Survey CreatorSurvey Qualifier
(reply to kirst) posted 25-Jun-2008 2:32pm  

hmmmm....I'm thinking... *wink*
cloudhugger Survey Central SubscriberGold Star Survey CreatorSurvey Qualifier
(reply to kirst) posted 25-Jun-2008 2:33pm  

By the way, you have excellent photograhic skills. I truly love your photos, I am not sure I've mentioned it before.
Crayons Double Gold Star Survey CreatorGold Qualifier
posted 25-Jun-2008 4:48pm  

If it was cheapest. Then I would build a bomb shelter.
kirst
(reply to cloudhugger) posted 26-Jun-2008 8:51am  

Thanks!
Matty Survey Central SubscriberGold Star Survey CreatorGold Qualifier
posted 27-Jun-2008 12:49pm  

No, I would never build a home anywhere that requires a special hazard insurance.
Kristal_Rose Survey Central Gold SubscriberBronze Star Survey CreatorSurvey Qualifier
(reply to Matty) posted 27-Jun-2008 10:15pm  

Are there such places?
Matty Survey Central SubscriberGold Star Survey CreatorGold Qualifier
(reply to Kristal_Rose) posted 28-Jun-2008 6:24am  

All over, have you not heard of flood insurance, hurricane insurance or tornado insurance? My point is that if an area requires a special insurance as part of homeowner's insurance, I would not live there.
Kristal_Rose Survey Central Gold SubscriberBronze Star Survey CreatorSurvey Qualifier
(reply to Matty) posted 29-Jun-2008 8:15am  

Yes I've heard of all those insurances. I'm just wondering where they don't apply. Hills have floods and slides, flat land has tornados unless it's in a forest in which case you have fires. There's Idaho perhaps, but even if it has trees, and borders the pacific fire rim. The safest places are probably dense and toxic now. I'd rather risk disastor than my health.
Matty Survey Central SubscriberGold Star Survey CreatorGold Qualifier
(reply to Kristal_Rose) posted 29-Jun-2008 9:04am  

ok
LJD Bronze Star Survey CreatorGold Qualifier
posted 30-Jun-2008 5:58pm  

Depending....if I chose to live in the mountains, I'd have an escape plan, hopefully have some kind of fire station nearby. Of course, have an insurance plan. .I'd choose not to live in an area that could be flooded. I live in an earthquake area already.
docgbrown
posted 25-Jul-2008 3:16pm  

Of course! I like earth quakes and if you set things up (fire breaks) and maintain them right wild fires aren't a real threat.



If you'd like to vote and/or comment on this survey, please Sign On.

 
Link this survey: http://surveycentral.org/survey/29425.html

Hits: 1 today (299 in the last 30 days)


This Month's BestBest ActiveBest InactivePick a CreatorPick a CategoryAll
New SurveyRepliesUsersSearchChatForumFeedbackStatisticsCustomizeHelp



Copyright © 1996-2008 Kenyon Hill LLC. All rights reserved.
Advertise on this site - Take our Poll - Privacy Statement - Subscribe - Donate - RSS RSS Feed