Survey CentralSign On
Create Account

This Month's BestBest ActiveBest InactivePick a CreatorPick a CategoryAll
New SurveyRepliesUsersSearchChatForumFeedbackStatisticsCustomizeHelp


Last

Type Created Category Creator Sort Votes Hides Rating
single11-May-2008hypothetical questionsouthernyankee Bronze Star Survey Creatorunsorted29258.6%

*offensive*
Advanced_Stats

  Time traveling: Would this constitute underage porn?

Inspired by:

http://surveycentral.org/survey/29175.html

Scenario: One goes back in time say 5 years back. They have some porn of some 20-year-old on their hard drive that they totally forgot about as they take their laptop back in time. This person on the video would have been 15 in real life at the time, but the image is of them at age 20. Would the person in the video retroactivly lose their ability to consent to appear in the said image hence making the said image contraband?

VotesAnswer
0yes
21no
1maybe
3other

UserComment
bill Survey Central Gold SubscriberDouble Gold Star Survey Creator
posted 12-May-2008 4:58am  

lol
Frostbrand Bronze Star Survey Creator
posted 12-May-2008 6:17am  

Temporal mechanics give me a headache.
Irene007 Survey Central Gold SubscriberBronze Star Survey Creator
posted 12-May-2008 9:18am  

No. She was 20 when the film was made.
Melf Survey Central SubscriberGold Star Survey CreatorGold QualifierThis user is on the site NOW (5 minutes and 48 seconds ago)
posted 12-May-2008 10:41am  

No, because he or she in the image has the potential to make the decision and will make the decision, and 'one' knows this.
romkey Survey Central Gold SubscriberBronze Star Survey CreatorSurvey Qualifier
posted 12-May-2008 11:49am  

Don't be ridiculous. The subject in the photo is not underage.
Enigma Bronze Star Survey Creator
posted 12-May-2008 4:43pm  

No. Who could even prove both the 15 year old and the woman on the video is one in the same person. Besides the VIDEO is of a twenty year old.
Biggles Gold Qualifier
posted 12-May-2008 5:17pm  

No - the age at which they gave consent would be the most important factor.
icurok Bronze Star Survey Creator
posted 13-May-2008 11:24am  

It would no more constitute child porn than going back in time would make you a paedophile due to your wife retrospectively losing consent to having had sex with you in the future.
Maarten Survey Central Subscriber
posted 16-May-2008 7:53pm  

*laughing out loud*
Crayons Gold Star Survey CreatorGold Qualifier
posted 24-May-2008 11:21pm  

If people go back in time, can't they affect what happens? I mean maybe if you told the 15 year old not to make porn when they got older, would it still be on the file?
RGirl Bronze Star Survey Creator
posted 25-May-2008 8:02pm  

No because the image was not of someone underage when they consented.



If you'd like to vote and/or comment on this survey, please Sign On.

 
Link this survey: http://surveycentral.org/survey/29232.html

Hits: 1 today (277 in the last 30 days)


This Month's BestBest ActiveBest InactivePick a CreatorPick a CategoryAll
New SurveyRepliesUsersSearchChatForumFeedbackStatisticsCustomizeHelp


Copyright © 1996-2008 Kenyon Hill LLC. All rights reserved.
Advertise on this site - Take our Poll - Privacy Statement - Subscribe - Donate - RSS RSS Feed