| User | Comment |
|---|
LindaH     | | posted 23-Mar-2008 5:18pm |
Neither of them are dangerous, unless they actually hurt someone. |
southernyankee  | | posted 23-Mar-2008 6:32pm |
A militant white supremacist because a crack dealer mostly kills either a) other crack dealers or b) drug users that try to dodge paying what they owe for said drugs whereas a militant white supremacist is more likely to kill "civilians".
However, I am thinking more along the lines of neither, because contrary to popular belief most rank and file white supremacists or black supremacists are actually non-violent. Especially if theres some leadership involved, which ironically, makes them MORE peaceful, not less. Well, they do a lot of "training", like push-ups and what not "preparing for war". Maybe a lot of marching. But thats about it. The Nation of Islam for instance beats up drug dealers and liquor store owners, or news reporters who say bad things about them. Thats about it really. Actual attacks on civilians are relatively rare. |
Melf   | | posted 23-Mar-2008 7:01pm |
Nice survey. The supremacist. |
| Galomorro | | posted 23-Mar-2008 7:02pm |
A militant white supremacist. |
| Biggles | | posted 23-Mar-2008 7:32pm |
I think both are potentially dangerous. |
| JessicaWoman99 | | posted 23-Mar-2008 8:45pm |
They are both equally dangerous |
| JessicaWoman99 | | (reply to LindaH) posted 23-Mar-2008 8:48pm |
> Neither of them are dangerous, unless they actually hurt someone.
Linda crack dealers they are hurting somebody, look at our young teens and those buying and using crack
out on the streets |
| LindaH |
People who buy and use crack hurt themselves. The dealer isn't hurting them. |
| JessicaWoman99 | | (reply to LindaH) posted 23-Mar-2008 9:04pm |
> People who buy and use crack hurt themselves. The dealer isn't hurting
> them.
Well yes true Linda, but I was thinking of the ones who sell crack to others that is when it becomes dangerous when
they sell to those like teens or about anybody it is dangerous and somebody will get hurt, they carry guns
and shoot you first and ask questions later |
| LindaH |
They don't tend to go after random people who don't deal with them. I wouldn't consider the average crack dealer a threat to me or my family. |
| RGirl | | posted 23-Mar-2008 11:11pm |
I can't decide. I can argue for both, that's why I asked. |
| dilfreak | | posted 23-Mar-2008 11:23pm |
They are equal in my mind. |
| Frostbrand | | posted 24-Mar-2008 1:21am |
A militant white supremacist. |
| jettles | | posted 24-Mar-2008 8:40am |
they probably ultimately have an equal detriment to society depending on how may people they each influence and where they are.............. |
| cerealkiller | | posted 24-Mar-2008 2:30pm |
Dangerous relative to what? To me personally, society in general, what? Neither is of concern to me personally. Overall the crack dealer is more dangerous to society. |
| RGirl |
I left the 'too what' and 'too who' up to the people answering. |
| LindaH | | (reply to RGirl) posted 24-Mar-2008 3:58pm |
I think neither one of them are dangerous to individuals, unless they are violent. As far as being dangerous to society in general, I'd say the white supremists are more dangerous. They are assuming things about people based on stereotypes, and putting themselves above others, based on those illogical assumptions. That's bad for society no matter who does it. (For example: People assume, make stereotypes, and feel "above" crazy or eccentric people all the time.) Crack dealers usually aren't "pushers". They deal to people who want it, who are doing dangerous things to their own self. They don't create the addictions. They aren't haters of entire groups of people. |
| southernyankee | | posted 24-Mar-2008 6:02pm |
Kinda think of it, aren't a lot of white supremacists crack dealers (or meth in a lot of cases) themselves? |
| LJD | | posted 24-Mar-2008 7:20pm |
A drug dealer, without a doubt |
| judgescratch | | posted 25-Mar-2008 8:38am |
A militant white supremacist
Good question |
| they | | posted 25-Mar-2008 11:05am |
Crack dealers aren't dangerous..... unless you screw them over.
I've known plenty. |
| Enheduanna | | posted 25-Mar-2008 11:42am |
A crack dealer. Fewer people are addicted to white supremacy and having their lives destroyed by it. |
| kcthedog | | posted 25-Mar-2008 4:36pm |
It is hard to quantify dangerous after a point both represent a serious risk to the safety and well-being of the community. The more immediate danger I think would be a militant white supremacist, he is libel to commit random acts of violence upon innocent people, where as a crack dealer is selling to people that more-or-less willingly take part in the purchase of drugs. |
Iseult  | | posted 26-Mar-2008 9:11am |
I don't owe any money to my white militant supremacist, so... |
| thecomic22 | | posted 26-Mar-2008 5:38pm |
Neither. |
| Kristal_Rose | | posted 28-Mar-2008 2:44am |
Physical damage or the possible spread of hate crime, I'll say the crack dealer. |
| cloudhugger | | posted 28-Mar-2008 10:40am |
The militant white supremacist. A crack dealer is easier to kill and less would care. |
| filiasan | | posted 28-Mar-2008 2:13pm |
I think it depends on who/what you are. To me, a crack dealer would be more dangerous. But it's not because I'm racist. I'm just white. I'm considering the possibility, though, that the militant white supremacist is more dangerous. Because, that kind of person is more likely to inflict harm on innocent civilians. |
| Enigma | | posted 9-Apr-2008 11:28pm |
The crack dealer.... odds are he will eventually be taken out due to his lifestyle but it may take some time. The militant white supremest appeals to the lowest form of fear. He is a coward and will probably be harder to take out. (Possibly because no one wants to waste the bullet.) I'm not quite sure how to say this... I'm not terribly fond of either to put it politely. I don't know why I'm putting it politely but I am. |
| SMILEY | | posted 13-Apr-2008 7:21pm |
Satan the Devil. |
| SMILEY | | posted 13-Apr-2008 7:25pm |
Satan the Devil and Santa Claus. |
