Sign On
Create Account

Last

TypeCreatedCategoryCreatorSortVotesHidesRating
multiple8-Dec-2006hypothetical questionlonghaultrucker by votes46357.8%

Advanced_Stats

What is the population of the city you live in?




VotesAnswer
151,000 to 100,000 people
7100,000 to 500,000 people
6500,000 to 1,000,000 people
51,000,000 to 20,000,000 people
5I don't live in a city
41 to 1,000 people
3I don't know
0More than 20,000,000
0Other

Comments (104),   Pages:prev   next1   2   all  
UserComment
Frostbrand Bronze Star Survey Creator
posted 9-Dec-2006 4:21am  
545,198
Lahdee Survey Qualifier
posted 9-Dec-2006 6:57am  
Bossier City (where I live): Population (year 2000): 56,461. Estimated population in July 2005: 60,505 (+7.2% change) Males: 27,426 (48.6%), Females: 29,035 (51.4%)

Shreveport (just over the river): Population (year 2000): 200,145. Estimated population in July 2005: 198,874 (-0.6% change) Males: 93,333 (46.6%), Females: 106,812 (53.4%)
sexy1
posted 9-Dec-2006 8:27am  
haven't got the foggiest
paulyw Survey Central Subscriber Gold Star Survey Creator Gold Qualifier
posted 9-Dec-2006 8:28am  
My population is about 15,500 people.
romkey Survey Central Gold Subscriber
posted 9-Dec-2006 8:40am  
I live in a village of roughly 300 people (not counting the boarding school here which also has around 300 students). The village is part of a town if maybe 2400 people.
dab Survey Central Subscriber Gold Qualifier
posted 9-Dec-2006 8:40am  
2,241 (year 2000)
ROCKMAN
posted 9-Dec-2006 8:41am  
I don't live in a city. I'm not sure what it is in the nearest city. Not a lot though.
cloudhugger
posted 9-Dec-2006 9:23am  
1000 to 100,000 yeah somewhere in there  * rolls eyes *
Melf Gold Qualifier
posted 9-Dec-2006 10:25am  
Just under 500,000 people I think.
hypersky
posted 9-Dec-2006 10:57am  
Gatineau has about 300,000 citizens. They're called Gatinois (pronounced Gati-nwa)
Enheduanna Survey Central Subscriber
posted 9-Dec-2006 12:12pm  
I think it's still something under 1,000,000, but not by much.
llamamama Bronze Star Survey Creator
posted 9-Dec-2006 12:31pm  
218,968 as of July 2005 apparently..
RainingFeathers Bronze Star Survey Creator
posted 9-Dec-2006 12:37pm  
The population here is approximately 700,000 people.
LindaH Survey Central Gold Subscriber Gold Star Survey Creator Survey Qualifier
posted 9-Dec-2006 12:51pm  
260,283 in 2000
LJD
posted 9-Dec-2006 1:13pm  
I believe it is 250,000 people. The city is growing much too fast.
MiniMary
posted 9-Dec-2006 1:45pm  
This is as close as I can come. (Having counted everyone at our town meeting)
MiniMary
(reply to hypersky) posted 9-Dec-2006 1:46pm  
I see that you've used my photo as an avatar! Bad boy!
MiniMary
(reply to Lahdee) posted 9-Dec-2006 1:48pm  
Who is that on your avatar? It isn't the same person as is on your user page.
Frostbrand Bronze Star Survey Creator
(reply to MiniMary) posted 9-Dec-2006 1:52pm  
I'm pretty sure that's Elliot from Scrubs.
MiniMary
(reply to Frostbrand) posted 9-Dec-2006 1:56pm  
Ok, I had no idea (and I still really don't. Don't watch the show!)
gambler Gold Star Survey Creator Gold Qualifier
posted 9-Dec-2006 2:25pm  
500,000 to 1,000,000 people
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary) posted 9-Dec-2006 3:41pm  
Didn't you tell me you didn't mind me using it as my avatar? If not, I'll take it off.
mandy
posted 9-Dec-2006 3:48pm  
small and yet very odd
longhaultrucker
posted 9-Dec-2006 4:19pm  
Fresno California has right around 478,000
ausfox
posted 9-Dec-2006 4:46pm  
3.7 million
longhaultrucker
(reply to LindaH) posted 9-Dec-2006 6:45pm  
You must reside in Anchorage?
LindaH Survey Central Gold Subscriber Gold Star Survey Creator Survey Qualifier
(reply to longhaultrucker) posted 9-Dec-2006 6:47pm  
yep
longhaultrucker
(reply to LindaH) posted 9-Dec-2006 6:50pm  
How did i know that? even though Alaska is bigger than Texas it only has 3 cities i have heard of, which is Juneau which is like 50,000 Anchorage which is like 200,000 and Kodiak which is like 2,000
bill Survey Central Gold Subscriber Gold Star Survey Creator
posted 9-Dec-2006 6:54pm  
The population was 1,661 at the 2000 census.
CGTREE
posted 9-Dec-2006 9:13pm  
56,000.
Enigma
posted 9-Dec-2006 10:30pm  
Population
- City (2001) 490,268
- Density 438.9/kmē
- Urban 618,820
- Metro 662,401
Zang
posted 10-Dec-2006 2:19am  
On the low side of "1,000,000 to 20,000,000 people"
longhaultrucker
(reply to Lahdee) posted 10-Dec-2006 9:14am  
Sounds like a place i need to move to, 29 thousand women and only 27 thousand men? maybe i could find a girl down there, one who is not corrupted by California culture
Lahdee Survey Qualifier
(reply to MiniMary) posted 10-Dec-2006 9:44am  
That's Elliott from Scrubs. The person on my user page is me.
JessicaWoman99
posted 10-Dec-2006 1:08pm  
The population here is 1500 people and a very small town
MiniMary
(reply to hypersky) posted 10-Dec-2006 4:28pm  
No keep it...it is one of my best poses so far, this year. I believe that the human body is beautiful!
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary) posted 10-Dec-2006 4:35pm  
It is...and yours is a fine example of the female form. With that image you make Christmas tempting!!!
MiniMary
(reply to Lahdee) posted 10-Dec-2006 4:47pm  
It was different yesterday, I guess all the SC users are prone to like medical shows. Interesting.
MiniMary
(reply to hypersky) posted 10-Dec-2006 4:49pm  
Well, the beauty of the human body is a subject that most artist/photographer friends (of mine) try to capture in many ways. This is one of them
Lahdee Survey Qualifier
(reply to MiniMary) posted 10-Dec-2006 4:53pm  
I changed it today. Scrubs is funny. It's my kind of wacky humor.  * grin *  * laughing out loud *
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary) posted 10-Dec-2006 4:54pm  
Nicely done. Do you model often?
MiniMary
(reply to Lahdee) posted 10-Dec-2006 5:02pm  
I hate it.  * frown * It reminds me of the Three Stooges.
MiniMary
(reply to hypersky) posted 10-Dec-2006 5:02pm  
Depends on who the photographer is!  * smile *
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary) posted 10-Dec-2006 5:10pm  
I'm driving down right now with my digital cam. What did you say your address was again???  * wink *
CynShar
posted 10-Dec-2006 6:45pm  
around 65,000
Maarten
posted 10-Dec-2006 9:05pm  
60,000 in my community.
longhaultrucker
(reply to MiniMary) posted 11-Dec-2006 12:38am  
I think youre more attractive than the woman in his avatar, plus your a New Yorker which is a tip and added bonus, no need to thank me  * wink *
MiniMary
(reply to hypersky) posted 11-Dec-2006 3:42pm  
ATTENTION: INFORMATION TO BE GIVEN AT A LATER DATE...ATTENTION: INFORMATION TO BE GIVEN AT A LATER DATE...ATTENTION: INFORMATION TO BE GIVEN AT A LATER DATE...ATTENTION: INFORMATION TO BE GIVEN AT A LATER DATE...ATTENTION: INFORMATION TO BE GIVEN AT A LATER DATE...ATTENTION.
MiniMary
(reply to longhaultrucker) posted 11-Dec-2006 3:56pm  
That IS my picture on Stephane's avatar. It was done for the sake of art and not anything that I am ashamed of. I think the human body is beautiful!!
longhaultrucker
(reply to MiniMary) posted 11-Dec-2006 6:31pm  
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, ok  * wink * I will have to take a longer look at it now, i think the human body, atleast the female body is beautiful, one reason i enjoyed strip clubs
MiniMary
(reply to longhaultrucker) posted 11-Dec-2006 6:43pm  
Don't be crass, Jeremy! The body is a work of art. Everybodys body!
longhaultrucker
(reply to MiniMary) posted 11-Dec-2006 6:46pm  
excuuuuuse me,  * laughing out loud *  * winking raspberry * i didn't find the male body that attractive, i can't stand there and look at a dudes wong and say to myself, what a masterpiece,  * dead face * I admit the human body is amazing, but i have a hard time with the male body
MiniMary
(reply to longhaultrucker) posted 11-Dec-2006 6:47pm  
I love to look at them.  * shock *  * shock *  * shock * (See what you are forcing me to say!!!!!)  * shock *
longhaultrucker
(reply to MiniMary) posted 11-Dec-2006 6:53pm  
You go right ahead and look at wongs,  * laughing out loud * and i will go ahead at look at a womens chest, buttocks area( politically correct) and lower abdominal area( politically correct) their beautiful face, and the rest of the body that i admire, then were both happy, hows that for " dispute resolution", see i'm learning from my training
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary) posted 11-Dec-2006 6:59pm  
Oh, so there is hope? Nice!  * cool grin *
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary, longhaultrucker) posted 11-Dec-2006 7:01pm  
Guys' bodies can be beautiful, too. Saying so doesn't make you gay, you know...
longhaultrucker
(reply to hypersky) posted 11-Dec-2006 7:03pm  
Ok, if i'm not gay then, i think the human body is kind of interesting, i'm not gay, never have been, never will be and have absolutely NO sexual desire for men never had and never will, but it is kind of interesting
hypersky
(reply to longhaultrucker) posted 11-Dec-2006 7:13pm  
Take a guy like Brad Pitt, or Johnny Depp or George Clooney. Handsome bastards all, and Pitt especially, is quite fit. Nothing gay about saying so.
longhaultrucker
(reply to hypersky) posted 11-Dec-2006 7:21pm  
Ok i see  * smile *
icurok
posted 12-Dec-2006 9:01am  
I live in a small village. No more than a few hundred people.
jettles Survey Central Gold Subscriber Gold Qualifier
posted 12-Dec-2006 9:02am  
just about a million.
Iseult Survey Central Subscriber Silver Star Survey Creator Gold Qualifier
posted 12-Dec-2006 1:17pm  
Toronto's at two and a half mill.
Waterloo's at eighty six thousand.
MiniMary
(reply to longhaultrucker) posted 12-Dec-2006 2:22pm  
?
MiniMary
(reply to hypersky) posted 12-Dec-2006 2:29pm  
If you really, really, really, really pray!  * wink *
MiniMary
(reply to hypersky) posted 12-Dec-2006 2:34pm  
> Guys' bodies can be beautiful, too. Saying so
> doesn't make you gay, you know...

I think CMT's overly critical statement indicates that there may be some internal, subconscious issues that he has yet to look at. A man is stable in his orientation when he is indifference to gay inuendo's and actually has gay friends. The ones who are terrorized by the word 'gay' still have some things to work out.
Women are a lot less critical of sexual orientation because we can feel the intimacy of bonding without our 'femininity' being threatened.
longhaultrucker
(reply to MiniMary) posted 12-Dec-2006 3:50pm  
 * laughing out loud *
cerealkiller Silver Star Survey Creator Gold Qualifier
posted 12-Dec-2006 5:03pm  
1-100,000 is a pretty broad range.

The "city" I live in has maybe 16,000 people. It wouldn't qualify as a city in the midwest. Village or town maybe.
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary) posted 12-Dec-2006 5:32pm  
I guess I'm toast then. I'm not big on religion and prayer. Sorry.  * frown *
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary) posted 12-Dec-2006 5:37pm  
When I was a teenager I had the typical homophobic issues. You're not sure who or what you are when you're a teen. Over time, I was exposed to gay culture and made a few friends who are gay. I know who I am so it doesn't bother me at all.
MiniMary
(reply to hypersky) posted 12-Dec-2006 7:13pm  
Wow, you hate God, you've stopped yourself from procreating. Stephane, what next? Are you going to give up..................alcohol????
MiniMary
(reply to hypersky) posted 12-Dec-2006 7:15pm  
Well, that's pretty normal....and your country is probably not so uptight. If men run away from the g word with disgust and acrimony...then something isn't straight (pardon the pun!!!) in their head!
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary) posted 13-Dec-2006 4:42pm  
I don't hate god. I just don't believe in the notion of an invisible almighty thing that gets pissed off as us for doing what it equipped us to do. As for alcohol, well, I like the occasional glass of wine, but I don't fuel on it or anything.
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary) posted 13-Dec-2006 4:43pm  
You got it. People fear what they don't know and are afraid to face their fears (and the unknown). You seem pretty open-minded.
MiniMary
(reply to hypersky) posted 13-Dec-2006 6:43pm  
What is God was visible? What if God lives inside you? What if when you look in the mirror, you see God? What if this God gave you the gift of free will in exchange for an imperfect life? A balance.
MiniMary
(reply to hypersky) posted 13-Dec-2006 6:44pm  
Yes, but it's not something that I announce, I'm a bit subtle. We become what we fear the most if we 'don't' face our fears.
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary) posted 13-Dec-2006 10:42pm  
I do believe that we possess the potential to be "divine" or to get in touch with the divine within us. That, to me, is the definition of spirituality. It's the whole concept pushed by organised religion of an external god who is disappointed in mankind that I can't connect with. If He is so perfect and almighty, why would god introduce shame and deficiencies into the equation?

My guess is that man created god as a device to explain what man explain (it is god's will that there are seasons) and to remove blame from man's failing (it is god's will that Jeremy became an alcoholic). I believe that the seasons can be explained scientifically and that it is Jeremy's inner weakness that has made him an alcoholic. BTW - Jeremy is just a name I plucked out of thin air.
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary) posted 13-Dec-2006 10:44pm  
I agree with you on that. Speaking of facing your fears, that skydiving picture was pretty neat! When did you jump?
LindaH Survey Central Gold Subscriber Gold Star Survey Creator Survey Qualifier
(reply to MiniMary) posted 16-Dec-2006 3:27pm  
I do not, for one minute think that there are many people who become what they fear the most, whether they face them or not.
MiniMary
(reply to hypersky) posted 17-Dec-2006 1:20pm  
 * wink *

You are speaking about one thin definition that one sect of people believe about regarding the existance of God, Stephane. The truth is, I think we feel a bit protected if we are able to believe in some aspect of a divine being. I will give you a kinda silly example. I went to college far away from home. It was the first time that I had been away from home and I lived in a college dorm, which happened to be coed. For a week, I made sure my door was locked...bathroom doors were locked, windows locked (I was on the first floor). I would hear the boys come home late at night...pounding on the girls doors, sometimes fighting. I was only 17 and pretty enough that the boys started banging on my door. I was living in the dorms for a little over a week and there was a rape on the floor above me. I was frantic and ready to go back home...when I recieved a visit from the RA, residential attendant ,to tell me that he would be working the overnight shift. It was the first time that I had ever heard about an RA. Don't know how I missed this information upon arrival...but, I suddenly felt just a little more protected, and I would say 'hi' to him every time I came in at night. In a funny way, this is how I view God. There was still trouble from time to time in the dorm, but I felt more protected with the RA close by. In a larger, more spiritual sense, this is my conception of God. But we all have our own...and again: free will for an imperfect life.
MiniMary
(reply to hypersky) posted 17-Dec-2006 1:21pm  
In my silly youth!
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary) posted 17-Dec-2006 1:34pm  
Again here, Mary, I'm not against religion per se (though some of my previous statements could be used against me on this...) If you get satisfaction in the idea of an overseer, an almighty presence that you feel protects you, then by all means believe in it and trust it. My problem is not so much with the idea of a deity, as with the humans who claim to represent the deities, and how these flawed humans warp the almighty one's messages.

My big frustration is with the contradictions of organized religions and how each one of them sees itself as the "real truth" when, in my mind, they are all saying the same thing. I believe that the values that religions promote (love each other, treat the other as you would want to be treated, respect your parents and so forth) are basically good, but that the warped messaging is what has led to countless wars and countless innocents being slaughtered over the centuries in the name of a god.
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary) posted 17-Dec-2006 1:35pm  
How many jumps do you have under your belt?
MiniMary
(reply to LindaH) posted 17-Dec-2006 4:47pm  
Well, of course this is only my opinion but supressing your fears only causes them to add up, and be more present in your everyday life (consciousness)...so manifesting them is not unusal, as they have such an active role in your cognitive mind. Coming to terms with fears help us eliminate them, being indifferent towards them and we're able to move forward. If the chicklen sits on the egg long enough, it hatches. If the chicken hates baby chicks, it would be worth while to leave the egg alone, thus, inactivating it.
LindaH Survey Central Gold Subscriber Gold Star Survey Creator Survey Qualifier
(reply to MiniMary) posted 17-Dec-2006 4:54pm  
Isn't being indifferent the same thing as suppressing?
MiniMary
(reply to hypersky) posted 17-Dec-2006 4:58pm  
Then your objection isn't with a God...it is with people. So, divorce yourself from the opinionated people, aspire to a higher level in terms of spirituality and believe what you want. I do...and feel protected. I don't listen to the fire and brimstone. I feel that my spiritual needs are being looked after and I am conscious of that. The result: I am warmer to humankind.  * smile *
MiniMary
posted 17-Dec-2006 5:00pm  
Too many to count...but I always have my needle with an OD of ativan in it...so if my shoot doesn't open... Bang, I'm out cold before I hit the ground. Good thinking, huh?
MiniMary
(reply to LindaH) posted 17-Dec-2006 5:09pm  
No, suppressing takes up a more and more concentrated space (as you push down your avoidence) in your brain, giving the subject matter more density...think of a brain tumor growing in a small space....pushing in upon itself...making it harder and much more dense. It becomes a 'real' thing...part of you. Think of a tephlon pan with subjects sifting through it and then out. This is indifference, letting things in and out, without them sticking...and soon being forgotten. Their deadly presence forgotten, not growing.
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary) posted 18-Dec-2006 6:14pm  
I like your take on it. God is us.
MiniMary
(reply to hypersky) posted 18-Dec-2006 7:18pm  
Yes, God is Us!
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary) posted 18-Dec-2006 9:01pm  
A-Men (like X-Men, except holier). Can we move on to another subject. Please?
MiniMary
(reply to hypersky) posted 19-Dec-2006 11:22am  
Of course....so, are you in contact with your ex-wife and I think (not sure) that you have primary custody of your girls. Clue me in on that. If you do have three girls living with you, I find that odd (though not unreasonable) that they are not with their mother...since they are girls, and all.
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary) posted 20-Dec-2006 5:07pm  
The oldest is shared one week on/one week off. The younger two I see every other week-end. i want to change that next year, and have all of them shared.
MiniMary
(reply to hypersky) posted 20-Dec-2006 6:47pm  
Every week is to confusing, Stephane (I don't mean to pry) and exhausting. It's like going to hotel to hotel every week. But, if it works for you then that is a good thing. I wouldn't want that arrangement for my children....and I don't. Mine can see their father when ever they want, here or at his place...but the nights they spend hear unless he requests them to stay over, which he does and can do anytime. Not week to week, though. Their lives would just be too interrupted at this point.
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary) posted 20-Dec-2006 8:22pm  
Sounds like you have it pretty much together with your arrangement. The custody arrangement we have suits our daughters, but the younger two are hinting that they want to see me more often. So do I.
MiniMary
(reply to hypersky) posted 21-Dec-2006 12:34pm  
More often than every other week? They may want more concentrate time with you, as they may feel the week to week thing is too much. Just my opinion. I don't want to go on further as it is none of my business. How long have you been divorced? Are you and your ex friendly?
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary) posted 21-Dec-2006 12:39pm  
separated 2 1/2 years ago, officially divorced since July. Friendly is an overstatement; let's call it business-like. There's still a bit of bitterness on her behalf that I had the nerve to finally leave. No major battles, but the odd flare-ups occur. How are you and your ex managing?
MiniMary
(reply to hypersky) posted 21-Dec-2006 3:15pm  
Fine, now that we are divorced...in the summer 2006, as well. I knew it was a good idea because I was really starting to dislike the man he was (as a husband) and now I genuinely like the person he is (as a friend)...and I'm sure that he is the same person in both instances but what has changed is: how I interact with him, the role he (now) plays in my life.
I'm glad that I asked him to leave. I did that because I didn't want to risk hating him, because I would have eventually and I like him too much to hate him...if any of that makes sense.
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary) posted 21-Dec-2006 4:19pm  
He's a lucky man. I can't see that happening here.
MiniMary
(reply to hypersky) posted 21-Dec-2006 4:24pm  
Maybe you waited until you were too deep and the resentments solidified. My ex husband and I weren't bringing out the best in each other...and I didn't want to live like that.
hypersky
(reply to MiniMary) posted 21-Dec-2006 4:56pm  
I stuck around for my daughters. Overstayed my welcome and there was a lot of resentment on my part. I let her take up too much space in the relationship.
Comments (104),   Pages:prev   next1   2   all  
Last
Advanced_Stats

If you'd like to vote and/or comment on this survey, please Sign On

 
Link this survey: http://surveycentral.org/survey/25770.html

Hits: 1 today (7 in the last 30 days)