| This Month's Best | Best Active | Best Inactive | Pick a Creator | Pick a Category | All |
| New Survey | Replies | Users | Search | Chat | Forum | Feedback | Statistics | Customize | Help |
| Type | Created | Category | Creator | Sort | Votes | Hides | Rating | |
| single | 9-Mar-2005 | hypothetical question | Updown | unsorted | 53 | 9 | 54.0% |
|
| User | Comment |
|---|---|
| Matty | posted 10-Mar-2005 1:39pm Yes, pure water is made of Hydrogen and Oxygen. |
| Enheduanna | posted 10-Mar-2005 1:44pm I think there are one or two very general ones. Everything else is relative. The one big one in my book is the sanctity of human life. But I'm sure many people will disagree with me even on that. |
| Matty | (reply to Enheduanna) posted 10-Mar-2005 1:51pm I think you're right. Just tell the "rat people" that people are more important than rats; then, sit back and watch the sparks fly. |
| thevelvetcure | posted 10-Mar-2005 2:02pm Sure, following one's own spiritual path, and not allowing oneself to be led lind by organized religions. |
| southernyankee | posted 10-Mar-2005 2:21pm no, not really. Pretty much everything is open to some type of interpetation. Even if its not really human. |
| gambler | posted 10-Mar-2005 2:23pm Yea , I guess like Mathematics |
| southernyankee | (reply to Matty) posted 10-Mar-2005 2:23pm make a survey about doing medical research on rats. Then if one of them dies, make a survey about how much should their ow-- um I mean gardians sue for malpractice.
|
| southernyankee | posted 10-Mar-2005 2:25pm ok, change vote, I guess there are certain things that are non-negotialbe, allthough some philosophy major will come up with a way to try to disprove that. |
| Matty | (reply to southernyankee) posted 10-Mar-2005 2:27pm While on the surface that's hilarious, I want to avoid the rat people as much as possible; I consider them quasi trolls.
BTW: what ultimately happened with Bob? |
| southernyankee | (reply to gambler) posted 10-Mar-2005 2:28pm did you know that mathematicians tried once to prove that one plus one is two. Apparantly the proff was several hundred pages long. |
| Enheduanna | (reply to Matty) posted 10-Mar-2005 2:39pm I'm not really talking about human life in comparison to other kinds of life, though. Human life is valuable in its own right, not in relation to any animals killed to try to save it. Rats may be valuable, too, but that's not the issue here. |
| Matty | (reply to Enheduanna) posted 10-Mar-2005 2:44pm I don't follow: are you saying universal acceptance of the sanctity of human life is not relative to other life? I think. |
| Updown | posted 10-Mar-2005 2:46pm Yes...there is. |
| anoddoblivion | posted 10-Mar-2005 2:48pm Yep. The father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
Some would say Jesus Christ. Some would say God. Some would say a relationship with. Some would say faith in. I just state the main point and cover it all. |
| Matty | (reply to anoddoblivion) posted 10-Mar-2005 2:50pm while I share you faith, surley you recognize that it's not accepted universally. |
| gambler | (reply to southernyankee) posted 10-Mar-2005 2:54pm really?............. What a waste of time |
| southernyankee | (reply to gambler) posted 10-Mar-2005 2:56pm apparantly not for them. aparantly they have lots of spare time on their hands. |
| Enheduanna | (reply to Matty) posted 10-Mar-2005 3:13pm Yes. Human life is valuable in and of itself, not in relation to other forms of life. |
| Matty | (reply to Enheduanna) posted 10-Mar-2005 3:14pm Is that part or your thesis, a personal belief, an observation...what? |
| darkshadowsseeker | posted 10-Mar-2005 3:35pm Yes in mathematics, chemistry. |
| darkshadowsseeker | (reply to Matty) posted 10-Mar-2005 3:36pm That would be amusing! |
| kcthedog | posted 10-Mar-2005 4:14pm They are called "FACTS" |
| Enheduanna | (reply to Matty) posted 10-Mar-2005 4:19pm Just a personal belief. |
| kcthedog | (reply to southernyankee) posted 10-Mar-2005 4:20pm > did you know that mathematicians tried once to prove that one plus
> one is two. Apparantly the proff was several hundred pages long. And how long did it take to prove the quantity that "one" resented? |
| cerealkiller | (reply to Matty) posted 10-Mar-2005 4:50pm How do you know that the water isn't an illusion? |
| jettles | posted 10-Mar-2005 4:59pm i believe their is absolute truth that we must find within ourselves but that we each have our own truth while walking this world. |
| southernyankee | (reply to kcthedog) posted 10-Mar-2005 5:03pm I don't know, I wasnt in on the project. I just heard about it from a second hand source. THe point is that the concept seems a bit stupid. What exactly is the point anyway. |
| LindaH | posted 10-Mar-2005 5:16pm Of course there is. Philosophy majors and others analysing things like this to the point of redefining them think too much.
I think people like to take the discomfort out of uncertainty by declaring that nothing is certian. |
| freebird | (reply to Matty) posted 10-Mar-2005 5:18pm Hey there I e-mailed you Matt and never got a reply. Please check. Hey I saw the user page, your wife is beautiful. You are a lucky man. Watch out for Cerealkiller, he would certainly love her. |
| kcthedog | (reply to southernyankee) posted 10-Mar-2005 5:54pm I was jokeing. But the number 1 (quantity) would need to be established before you could add it to itself, right? |
| Starfish | posted 10-Mar-2005 6:06pm No.
But then, what I've just said isn't true.... arrggghhh |
| Matty | (reply to cerealkiller) posted 10-Mar-2005 7:08pm cause Nietze died by his own hand, alone, broke, and drunk,...so much for that bullcrap. |
| Matty | (reply to freebird) posted 10-Mar-2005 7:11pm Thanks, for the complement about wife. I'll check my e-mail too.
And thanks for the tip, I'll clean my firearms and give my Rotty, Stiffy, a description of Cerealkiller |
| Matty | (reply to freebird) posted 10-Mar-2005 7:13pm never got anything...did you send any kind of attachment??? |
| romkey | posted 10-Mar-2005 9:30pm Most things that people consider "truth" are subjective. Even most scientific facts are more hypotheses that have been stated as facts. The few things that are really objectively true are things on the order of "this thing is sitting on top of that thing". |
| anonymous | (reply to anoddoblivion) posted 10-Mar-2005 9:32pm Why are they more important than Zeus and Heracles, or Odin and Thor? |
| Biggles | posted 10-Mar-2005 10:40pm I don't see why giving the science example Maarten did in qual should be deemed "smartass". Under x circumstances, combining a and b will always result in c and d. I think it holds true for moral situations as well - you can't generalise maybe, but take a very specific situation and you can say, in this situation, this act is always wrong. |
| southernyankee | (reply to kcthedog) posted 11-Mar-2005 1:02am I wonder if that sort of thing would work for binary numbers too |
| kcthedog | (reply to southernyankee) posted 11-Mar-2005 8:16am Think about it, if you met someone that had absolutely no knowledge of math. How would you describe to him the concept of numbers and addition. What is a one? And when you add it to itself and you get two (what the hell is a two?)(what is addition?) You would have better luck getting directions from a chinese. |
| Matty | (reply to kcthedog) posted 11-Mar-2005 9:04am that person may not have a concept of mathematics as we know it, however s/he can count. If someone has a family with two kids and a spouse, that person knows how to gather enough oranges for lunch, etc. Is that math?...no Is that rudimentary understanding enough to grasp that you need two more oranges?...you betcha |
| caviartaste | posted 11-Mar-2005 9:08am No. Truth is relative. |
| caviartaste | posted 11-Mar-2005 9:14am "...depends on what the definition of IS is"....
"....there are things we know we know....and things we know we don't know....and then there are things we don't know that we don't know....."........LOL |
| kcthedog | (reply to Matty) posted 11-Mar-2005 9:55am I agree, it was the interaction that I thought would interesting. |
| Matty | (reply to kcthedog) posted 11-Mar-2005 10:06am fair enough, but I think that's the problem with over-relativist discussions. We could discuss 1 + 1 = 2 until the end of time, yet vvdkjvndkjhn gathers two more oranges for his two kids every day. I say too much relatavism leads to mental masturbation.
Oh, sorry, I was speaking generally, not about your discussion with SY. Please don't take offense at that. |
| Updown | (reply to Biggles) posted 11-Mar-2005 10:37am You are correct. The question posed about absolute "truths" is, in fact, a logic question. Maybe I should've made that clear before now? Logical equations are very similar to mathematical equations, but I am not suggesting that someone prove it using logical statements. I don't even remember how to do it. |
| freebird | (reply to Matty) posted 11-Mar-2005 12:27pm No no attachment. I have no online pics or anything. I will look again. email is on the user page. You have a rott? Oh cool I love those dogs. I will try your email again. |
| Matty | (reply to freebird) posted 11-Mar-2005 12:28pm great, I look forward to it
yes, a German rotty |
| kcthedog | (reply to Matty) posted 11-Mar-2005 1:24pm Don't worry, I mentally masturbate on a regular basis. You know what they say, don't use it, you will loose it! |
| Matty | (reply to kcthedog) posted 11-Mar-2005 1:30pm |
| southernyankee | (reply to kcthedog) posted 11-Mar-2005 2:42pm I guess. I didnt think of it that way. |
| Zang | posted 11-Mar-2005 4:41pm Ever heard of "Schrödinger's cat"? |
| kcthedog | (reply to southernyankee) posted 12-Mar-2005 2:09pm How he meant it, and how you choose to receive it, is your choice. I felt a twist but chose to ignore it. Besides what’s wrong with mental masturbation? |
| bombill | posted 12-Mar-2005 10:34pm I suppose there is, in the way that if there was no Truth, that would be the Truth, so Truth must exist. But whatever the Truth is, I don't believe it can be known, because as creatures inside the universe (and taking up an infinitely small part of it), we are always unable to perceive the entire Big Picture. Truth was meant to be sought, not found. It cannot be put into words. |
| Iseult | posted 13-Mar-2005 10:58am I don't know and don't care, why don't you gather a band of pseudo-intellectuals and investigate this issue. |
| Iseult | (reply to Updown) posted 13-Mar-2005 11:00am I had not idea this survey was by you. I wanted to be even meaner in my response. I just hate Epistemology with passion. And last year my Phil 101 was filled with stupid pseudo-intellectuals who tried to discuss this subject. |
| ROCKMAN | posted 13-Mar-2005 11:08am I think so. |
| autumnlight | posted 14-Mar-2005 9:52am Mathematical formulae |
| Updown | (reply to Iseult) posted 14-Mar-2005 10:55am It's actually solvable with about 5 statements. It was meant to be more of a logic question, but I failed utterly. It was the first time I created a survey on a whim. |
| anoddoblivion | (reply to anonymous) posted 14-Mar-2005 3:36pm If it's an absolute truth, it doesn't have to be more important. |
| anoddoblivion | (reply to Matty) posted 14-Mar-2005 3:39pm Sorry for such a late reply.
Yes, I realize this, of course. Like I replied to Teddy Miller, short of hypnotism or torture, you can't make everyone accept one thing (yes, poor explination, but humor me, you [everyone, for that matter] get[s] what I'm trying to convey, I hope). |
| freebird | (reply to Matty) posted 16-Mar-2005 4:04pm |
| Wolfgang | posted 16-Mar-2005 5:38pm i guess in court, maybe |
| Matty | (reply to freebird) posted 16-Mar-2005 9:21pm got it, replied |
| Matty | (reply to Wolfgang) posted 17-Mar-2005 8:54am Ahhh, so you have been convicted; I didn't know capital criminals were allowed access to the internet. You are very lucky indeed. |
| Wolfgang | (reply to Matty) posted 21-Mar-2005 11:18am You do your homework and read about the laws of this nation and voting will be more special for you when you can do so. |
| Matty | (reply to Wolfgang) posted 21-Mar-2005 12:15pm yes, I agree that I know nothing about how criminals such as yourself are treated |
| Wolfgang | (reply to Matty) posted 23-Mar-2005 1:23pm You have a sharp tongue, I believe that it true. i would have to wash your mouth out with soap..if i were that kind of person |
| Matty | (reply to Wolfgang) posted 23-Mar-2005 7:24pm |
| patarnone | posted 25-Mar-2005 6:44am 1) Birth
2) Death everything else is negotiable |
| patarnone | (reply to Matty) posted 25-Mar-2005 6:45am Matty, I love this... and you tell them yourself... I KNOW people are more important. |
| patarnone | (reply to southernyankee) posted 25-Mar-2005 6:49am south, I was sorta disappointed to see you sinking to their level, though I love a challenge!
Truth be told, I like this site because it's NOT about rats and I can talk about all the OT I want... (OT is Off Topic) But it takes all kinds of people and Karma always comes back... |
| Matty | (reply to patarnone) posted 25-Mar-2005 6:56am I'm sorry, again I jut don't understand what the "this" is to which you are referring. |
| southernyankee | (reply to patarnone) posted 25-Mar-2005 1:55pm those "rat people" have no sense of humor. Besides, in some countries people DO actually eat rats, so whats the big deal. Its a lot more humane than killing them senselessly. Besides, considering the high amount of people (1/2 of world pop I think) living under 2 dollars a day, they might as well. Apparantly these "rat people" or whatever they call themselves these days dont understand that people come first, and they have no sense of humor neither.
So apparantly now according to them, I am a fancy rat eating troll (or FRET if you will, the acronym has a nice ring to it), whatever that is. |
| southernyankee | (reply to patarnone) posted 25-Mar-2005 2:00pm dont get me wrong, the opinions of the "rat people" are ok in themselves. Not to bash against them, I think that sometimes people take something a bit too far. Ok I get it, you like rats. I think thats the kind of attitude many of SC users have. |
| patarnone | (reply to southernyankee) posted 25-Mar-2005 6:05pm Hey, I heard roasted rat can be real tasty, I have zero problem with what others do with them. What I objected to, and it's really more in fun, were the unkind comments by a couple other guys about "those rat fans" implying we are all a bunch of noobs. THEN when he threw in a slur about the Mafia, I hadda respond... my Grandfather came to the USA in 1911 from Sicily. So, I get snipped once, no big deal, but when my ancestry gets trashed, time to say Whoa! |
| southernyankee | (reply to patarnone) posted 25-Mar-2005 6:19pm who was this one person. Its kinda hard to find things in that survey. It has so many posts and most of them are hella long. I'll have to use find to find the text you are refering to. |
| patarnone | (reply to southernyankee) posted 25-Mar-2005 6:25pm ya know, south, I was just thinking that the "reply" system is not very good here... like I don't get to my eagerly awaited replies until the next day, and then it's no where NEAR the post that sparked it. Is there any way to just reply to the single person and not the whole list? I guess when I reply, I will do a short synopsis so people down the line won't be so confused... hell, so "I" won't be so confused! |
| patarnone | (reply to southernyankee) posted 25-Mar-2005 6:29pm it's mostly Matty with rat-phobia, but BillyBobBob got in on it, too... |
| southernyankee | (reply to patarnone) posted 25-Mar-2005 6:57pm funny you say that. Matty and BillyBobBob were going at it in chat the other day. Its nice to see them finally getting along As far as the reply system, I think its the greatest that there ever was. First off, all your replies are buffered into the replys button. Secondly, it used to be worse. I remember when you had to reply and a long assed scroll bar was around. Oftentimes you'd reply to the wrong comment made by the right person and it takes a hella long time to figure out what is what. Its not until now that all your comments have those icons where you can reply directly by clicking them. |
| Matty | (reply to patarnone) posted 25-Mar-2005 7:03pm I don't have rat -phobia; I just don't like them. Further, what I took exception to, was the comparison of rat life to human life |
| patarnone | (reply to Matty) posted 25-Mar-2005 7:57pm hey, matty, I just took HOURS it seems speed reading the miles of posts on that original survey... and from my 8 or 9 months on Ratlist, ya, they can get verbose! I personally am a dog person, but can't have either a dog or a cat where I live. And I personally like the "flame wars" but it's best closer to the topic. I enjoy hot discussions, and I hope by my survey responses, I don't push my rats, though I sometimes DO mention Jay and Silent Bob. I noticed right away who the "movers and shakers" are here in SC. I respect your dedication to expressing differing points of interest. I am not being facitious, either... I can be a bit of an instigator, too! Cheers, and thanks for welcoming me in! Pat |
| Matty | (reply to patarnone) posted 25-Mar-2005 8:17pm Look, my whole point with the rat thing is that I don't care what people do int heir house; I didn't get pissed until the "I prefer rats to people" crap. I would never have anything against you or your rats as long as you are a reasonable and nice person; and so far, you seem ok to me.
But some people that flooded the discussion seemed compl;etely full of crap to me, so I escalated as well. I'm combatant by nature. Some of my dearest friends have nicknamed me "Alpha Male." I spent 8 years in the Army and now work in "parts unknown" in the Federal government. So yeah, I come heavy or I don't come at all. Anyway, I welcome you and your rats |
| patarnone | (reply to Matty) posted 26-Mar-2005 6:48am Matty, you're a trip... we got a lot more in common than you know! And did you know that rats (both wild and domestic) have an Alpha Male (and female, too) and often there are scuffles and outright fights for dominance!
To be honest, I respond when goaded, too. I got a lot of military and security people in my background... matter of fact, I have some men friends seek me out because I seem to understand "that" area better than most ladies... someone even asked me once what branch I'd been in! My father was a cop for a while, too... I grew up on Dragnet (starting in the 50's) So, said all that to say this, I'm glad we agree we're both nice people! I look forward to more "may we live in interesting times" surveys! Pat |
| Matty | (reply to patarnone) posted 26-Mar-2005 8:51am Rats, wolves, hyenas, alligators. Alligators are what my friends use to describe me, you know, bellowing to scare other male alligators for miles around. Apparently, I'm an alpha male alligator...watch out for my snout!!! |
| patarnone | (reply to Matty) posted 26-Mar-2005 9:01am Being the dog person I am, the Wolf is my totem animal... but I watch a LOT of nature shows, and the Hynea is totally fascinating.
Speaking on the big reptiles, I still like the saying,( and this is NOT directed at you) "Don't let your alligator mouth over ride your hummingbird a*s!" My late sig other was real fond of that one! He also liked to say... "you'll crap if ya eat regular" |
| Matty | (reply to patarnone) posted 26-Mar-2005 9:05am I say "BLEh BLEH BLEH BLEH BLEH BLEH BLEH BLEH BLEH" and scare the other alligators away. |
| patarnone | (reply to Matty) posted 26-Mar-2005 9:22am I bet water dances on your back when you bellow, too! True thing... its the vibrations!
Now the Nile Crocodile, that's a dangerous boy! Salty's cousin, as the Croc Hunter would say. |
| DucKid | posted 28-Mar-2005 7:13pm Yes there is. Look at this example:
"Does this outfit make me look fat?" "Yes" "Were you listening" " |
If you'd like to vote and/or comment on this survey, please Sign On
| This Month's Best | Best Active | Best Inactive | Pick a Creator | Pick a Category | All |
| New Survey | Replies | Users | Search | Chat | Forum | Feedback | Statistics | Customize | Help |