| This Month's Best | Best Active | Best Inactive | Pick a Creator | Pick a Category | All |
| New Survey | Replies | Users | Search | Chat | Forum | Feedback | Statistics | Customize | Help |
| Type | Created | Category | Creator | Sort | Votes | Hides | Rating | |
| single | 31-Aug-2004 | personal preferences | anonymous | unsorted | 65 | 8 | 62.7% |
|
| User | Comment |
|---|---|
| Glassa | posted 1-Sep-2004 1:49pm |
| FordGuy | posted 1-Sep-2004 2:10pm Gimme the arm candy! |
| LindaH | posted 1-Sep-2004 2:31pm #1. BUT... if "wonderfully attractive personality" meant a socialite with loads of charisma, and "extremely self centered" meant nice and considerate but wrapped up in their own perception of the world, I'd take #2. |
| DUNDO | posted 1-Sep-2004 2:55pm I would go out witz BOTH LOL ............ |
| dora | posted 1-Sep-2004 3:22pm partner #1 I'm not an idiot.
|
| dora | (reply to LindaH) posted 1-Sep-2004 3:23pm well, but someone who is a socialite doesn't mean "attractive personality".
|
| Iseult | posted 1-Sep-2004 3:39pm Number 2.
Wait, which one is richer? |
| LindaH | (reply to dora) posted 1-Sep-2004 4:20pm I know, but some people think it does. |
| MacGregor | posted 1-Sep-2004 4:30pm #1 for sure. You can always improve your fitness, but usually a bad personality is for good. |
| LuridHope | posted 1-Sep-2004 4:34pm I would prefer #1, but I understand that there are sick people out there who do not feel loved unless they are being neglected. I feel sorry for thier needs, they have no idea what they are missing. |
| Danger | posted 1-Sep-2004 5:19pm It depends on how long I would stay with this partner I think. |
| jettles | posted 1-Sep-2004 6:27pm neither really but if i had to pick then it would be #1 without a doubt! |
| cerealkiller | posted 1-Sep-2004 7:34pm Well, I couldn't handle #1 if I liked sex a lot. I can't get turned on by overweight females, which would be the opposite of what I like. So, I guess in the long run I'd prefer #2. Hmm, my wife is the worst of both - not my preferred body type, not nice most of the time and is very self-centered. |
| cerealkiller | (reply to Glassa) posted 1-Sep-2004 7:34pm Get him a wig for 'playtime'. |
| iamdonte | posted 1-Sep-2004 8:50pm Body type means nothing to me....I want what is on the inside. |
| moonstone | posted 1-Sep-2004 9:23pm #1 ! |
| caviartaste | posted 1-Sep-2004 10:59pm Partner one |
| snoopidoops | posted 2-Sep-2004 12:07am With those as the only choices...I'll stay single thanks... |
| bonniath | posted 2-Sep-2004 3:01am Alone, of course. |
| bill | posted 2-Sep-2004 7:53am I believe that I am primarily attracted to what is inside someone (personality)... I don't think I even have a "preferred body type". |
| TeddyMiller | posted 2-Sep-2004 9:21am I'm not interested in a sexual or romantic relationship, so I'd pick being single, and if I had to choose a partner, I'd pick #1. |
| they | posted 2-Sep-2004 9:59am 1 |
| ROCKMAN | posted 3-Sep-2004 7:03am Of these 2 choices I would prefer to be single. |
| thevelvetcure | posted 3-Sep-2004 10:11am Personality 1 without a doubt, especially as I don't have some ideal "preferred body type" that I go for. |
| Maarten | posted 3-Sep-2004 11:45am #1 for sure. I have dated both types and #2 gets on your nerves VERY quickly! |
| denise804 | posted 5-Sep-2004 11:42am I'd prefer an attractive personality as long as the body or face is average. I'm not too picky. |
| Triebie | posted 5-Sep-2004 7:39pm Fortunately my husband has all the good qualities. If I had to chose, though, I'd want someone who would be my friend and care about me as much as himself. |
| Zang | posted 6-Sep-2004 4:04pm I would either go with Partner #1 or be single. It depends on what you mean by "nowhere near your preferred body type". When it comes to my preferences in physical appearance the primary thing is maturity. Anyone who is "nowhere near" that, would be ruled out completely. However, if you are talking about other aspects, none of which are nearly that important to me, I'd go with #1.
I picked #1, assuming that was the direction of the question. |
| TrinityAnn | posted 6-Sep-2004 7:34pm it really would depend....i mean number one definitly unless there just like a 900 pound version of the hunch back of notre dam, cause i would not date someone like 2 even if they're perfect, i cant stand pppl who are stuck on themselves |
| SueBee | posted 7-Sep-2004 1:10am Looks usually fade as the years go by, but the personality remains the same, so it's much more important. While I don't look for physical perfection in a partner, there has to be something about them that I find physically attractive. I'd rather be single than settle for someone who is not a good match for me. |
| Enheduanna | posted 8-Sep-2004 1:18am Probably #1, although it would really depend to an extent. I like to think that I'm not completely shallow, but I still have certain types I just wouldn't be attracted to. |
| uible | posted 9-Sep-2004 7:12pm #1 |
| knell | posted 10-Sep-2004 1:57am It is really tricky >_<
So single is better... |
| moviesnob | posted 11-Sep-2004 3:33pm Well, #1. If your personality doesn't attract me, then I won't be attracted to you. |
| thresholdking | posted 17-Sep-2004 11:27pm My partner in the company picnic sack race, I would pick the fastest, If your speaking of a project Like O IDK physics then the most intelligent one of course. |
| wolfchik9 | posted 18-Sep-2004 10:35pm I chose Partner #1 as this describes my SO. |
If you'd like to vote and/or comment on this survey, please Sign On
| This Month's Best | Best Active | Best Inactive | Pick a Creator | Pick a Category | All |
| New Survey | Replies | Users | Search | Chat | Forum | Feedback | Statistics | Customize | Help |
I always liked men with long hair, and my husband is bald.