| This Month's Best | Best Active | Best Inactive | Pick a Creator | Pick a Category | All |
| New Survey | Replies | Users | Search | Chat | Forum | Feedback | Statistics | Customize | Help |
| Type | Created | Category | Creator | Sort | Votes | Hides | Rating | |
| single | 22-Jan-1998 | politics/religion | elijahblue | unsorted | 54 | 10 | 49.1% |
|
| User | Comment |
|---|---|
| bill | posted 22-Jan-1998 7:21am whatever, I don't care, I don't even watch the news anymore... |
| fiore | posted 22-Jan-1998 1:14pm He should be impeached and that whole orgainzation should go under an investigation. There's so much corruption there it makes the Mafia look like a legitimate business :) |
| zoomie | posted 22-Jan-1998 11:15pm Isn't he already impaired? I'm sorry, I couldn't resist. |
| Jaime | posted 23-Jan-1998 5:00am Sorry, I'm not from USA. No matter for me, USA seems to be the same with any president, at least from outised the USA. |
| KenShingo | posted 23-Jan-1998 5:09am Well, it's very unlikely... Unless Paula Jones or Whitewater really has a SOLID case. Not all of us are US people, so we didn't know. I dunno, nobody sets the example, so I don't think that affairs should be that serious of an impeachment. |
| Timmi | posted 23-Jan-1998 2:59pm No one's proven he's done anything illegal yet. You can only impeach an American President for breaking the law, not just for being shady, slimy or "inappropriate." He's certainly done nothing worse than occured during the Bush/Reagan years. |
| dab | posted 23-Jan-1998 10:45pm If there turns out to be sufficient evidence then he should be impeached. At the moment they're still collecting evidence on this latest. I doubt he will be though. |
| gilly | posted 29-Jan-1998 12:35pm I really don't think his sex life, however potentially sleazy, counts for much compared to his political track record. He's not perfect, but he's a lot better than "President Gingrich", IMHO. |
| steve | posted 29-Jan-1998 6:00pm No, there is now a tape that confirms that a 24-year old intern said, once, that he slept with her. BIG difference. EB--I didn't say I believe him; I think he probably did sleep with her, and I don't care. I said that there was a big difference between "confirms that he slept with" and "confirms that she claimed that he slept with". |
| weth | posted 29-Jan-1998 7:43pm For what? Dipping his wick? No way! Now, if you have some dirt on some real crime against the state, let us know. But this Lewinsky nonsense is a farce. I just don't care who sees his peepee. |
| mcarlos | posted 12-Feb-1998 8:56pm there is absolutely no reason to impeach him - there must be a breach of the constitution by him and there isn't. |
| Frizbone | posted 28-Feb-1998 2:13am It seems that the "Right to Privacy" is beeing ignored to anyone in a position of some power. |
| Dolemite | posted 1-Mar-1998 4:38pm I don't follow the news. However, I think Clinton should be given a big raise, a fat one-foot joint, another blow job from Paula Jones, and a harem of interns in the west wing. Boy, that would make anybody's day. |
| joe | posted 19-Mar-1998 10:08pm all politicians are crooks, clinton no more or less so |
| booker | posted 20-Mar-1998 1:11am mcarlos: Lying under oath is an impeachable offense. And it is looking more and more like that's what he has done, at least in the Paula Jones trial. |
| jjg | posted 15-May-1998 5:51pm The whole town? |
| reality | posted 12-Jun-1998 3:55pm while he (apparently) can't keep mr happy in his pants, he hasn't done anything that jepardizes the country in some way. |
| phi | posted 25-Jun-1998 8:20pm And Starr is *really* reaching at this point. Give it up. |
| Biggles | posted 3-Aug-2006 7:48pm No. What a long time ago that was. I was 14 when this survey was made! |
If you'd like to vote and/or comment on this survey, please Sign On
| This Month's Best | Best Active | Best Inactive | Pick a Creator | Pick a Category | All |
| New Survey | Replies | Users | Search | Chat | Forum | Feedback | Statistics | Customize | Help |