Sign On
Create Account

Click Here

Last

TypeCreatedCategoryCreatorSortVotesHidesRating
single22-Jan-1998politics/religionelijahblue unsorted541049.1%

Advanced_Stats

Should Clinton be impeached?




VotesAnswer
9yes
28no
11no opinion

UserComment
bill Survey Central Gold Subscriber Gold Star Survey Creator
posted 22-Jan-1998 7:21am  
whatever, I don't care, I don't even watch the news anymore...
fiore
posted 22-Jan-1998 1:14pm  
He should be impeached and that whole orgainzation should go under an investigation. There's so much corruption there it makes the Mafia look like a legitimate business :)
zoomie
posted 22-Jan-1998 11:15pm  
Isn't he already impaired? I'm sorry, I couldn't resist.
Jaime
posted 23-Jan-1998 5:00am  
Sorry, I'm not from USA. No matter for me, USA seems to be the same with any president, at least from outised the USA.
KenShingo
posted 23-Jan-1998 5:09am  
Well, it's very unlikely... Unless Paula Jones or Whitewater really has a SOLID case.

Not all of us are US people, so we didn't know.

I dunno, nobody sets the example, so I don't think that affairs should be that serious of an impeachment.

Timmi
posted 23-Jan-1998 2:59pm  
No one's proven he's done anything illegal yet. You can only impeach an American President for breaking the law, not just for being shady, slimy or "inappropriate." He's certainly done nothing worse than occured during the Bush/Reagan years.
dab Survey Central Subscriber Gold Qualifier
posted 23-Jan-1998 10:45pm  
If there turns out to be sufficient evidence then he should be impeached. At the moment they're still collecting evidence on this latest. I doubt he will be though.
gilly
posted 29-Jan-1998 12:35pm  
I really don't think his sex life, however potentially sleazy, counts for much compared to his political track record. He's not perfect, but he's a lot better than "President Gingrich", IMHO.
steve
posted 29-Jan-1998 6:00pm  
No, there is now a tape that confirms that a 24-year old intern said, once, that he slept with her. BIG difference. EB--I didn't say I believe him; I think he probably did sleep with her, and I don't care. I said that there was a big difference between "confirms that he slept with" and "confirms that she claimed that he slept with".
weth
posted 29-Jan-1998 7:43pm  
For what? Dipping his wick? No way! Now, if you have some dirt on some real crime against the state, let us know. But this Lewinsky nonsense is a farce. I just don't care who sees his peepee.
mcarlos
posted 12-Feb-1998 8:56pm  
there is absolutely no reason to impeach him - there must be a breach of the constitution by him and there isn't.
Frizbone
posted 28-Feb-1998 2:13am  
It seems that the "Right to Privacy" is beeing ignored to anyone in a position of some power.
Dolemite
posted 1-Mar-1998 4:38pm  
I don't follow the news. However, I think Clinton should be given a big raise, a fat one-foot joint, another blow job from Paula Jones, and a harem of interns in the west wing. Boy, that would make anybody's day.
joe
posted 19-Mar-1998 10:08pm  
all politicians are crooks, clinton no more or less so
booker
posted 20-Mar-1998 1:11am  
mcarlos: Lying under oath is an impeachable offense. And it is looking more and more like that's what he has done, at least in the Paula Jones trial.
jjg
posted 15-May-1998 5:51pm  
The whole town?
reality
posted 12-Jun-1998 3:55pm  
while he (apparently) can't keep mr happy in his pants, he hasn't done anything that jepardizes the country in some way.
phi
posted 25-Jun-1998 8:20pm  
And Starr is *really* reaching at this point. Give it up.
Biggles Bronze Star Survey Creator Survey Qualifier
posted 3-Aug-2006 7:48pm  
No. What a long time ago that was. I was 14 when this survey was made!
Last
Advanced_Stats

If you'd like to vote and/or comment on this survey, please Sign On

 
Link this survey: http://surveycentral.org/survey/164.html

Hits: 1 today (4 in the last 30 days)