|
| Author | Message |
|---|
LindaH   
| | #1 posted June 14, 2008 at 11:57pm (EDT) |
clo8275 posted new comments in some surveys, and I'm wondering why they didn't show up in 'whats new'
http://surveycentral.org/survey/28636.html#C948703 |
Melf  
| | #2 posted June 15, 2008 at 5:12am (EDT) |
Isn't it that they don't show when the survey isn't active? |
bill   
| | #3 posted June 15, 2008 at 6:35am (EDT) |
I think Melf is right. That survey is inactive. |
LindaH
| | #4 posted June 15, 2008 at 10:59am (EDT) |
Ok thanks. So is there a selector for seeing any survey with new postings? |
Irene007
| | #5 posted June 15, 2008 at 1:18pm (EDT) |
Inactive? What constitutes that? I can still post in it. Seems to me, in the past, when a survey was inactive; you couldn't do anything with it except read it. |
bill
| | #6 posted June 15, 2008 at 5:39pm (EDT) |
Inactive New ?
A survey being Inactive doesn't change it that much anymore. People can still vote on it and comment on it. I think it just doesn't show up in What's New.
This issue was that we'd get these waves of someone going through old surveys and it caused everyone's What's New to explode, for no good reason (or something like that). |
Irene007
| | #7 posted June 15, 2008 at 6:01pm (EDT) |
Ah, I see... Makes sense. |
Melf
| | #8 posted June 16, 2008 at 5:53am (EDT) |
I was thinking then 'Ooh, I'll put it on my bar thingy, go through 'em all.'
Then I saw this:
Surveys - (54.9% ave rating) - 1 to 10 of 20249 catch-up - Next 10
|
LindaH
| | #9 posted June 16, 2008 at 11:59am (EDT) |
 get crackin' |
bill
| | #10 posted June 16, 2008 at 12:48pm (EDT) |
I did the same then immediately clicked catch-up and immediately felt better about it. |
Melf
| | #11 posted June 16, 2008 at 2:11pm (EDT) |
But that's cheating! |
dab
| | #12 posted June 16, 2008 at 2:32pm (EDT) |
A few months back I went through all of those inactive surveys. I was tempted by catch-up but I held off. Then again, I didn't have over 20,000. |
Melf
| | #13 posted June 16, 2008 at 3:25pm (EDT) |
Wow, kudos. I've been through about 200, so far. Which doesn't actually sound too bad, it only took about three quarters of an hour. That's 75 hours... about three and a half days. Solid. |
dab
| | #14 posted June 17, 2008 at 8:15am (EDT) |
It took me a couple weeks to clear out the backlog. |
LindaH
| | #15 posted June 17, 2008 at 1:49pm (EDT) |
abstain - next - abstain - next.... |
cloudhugger
| | #16 posted June 18, 2008 at 9:14am (EDT) |
...object....filter....filter.......hide... |
bill
| | #17 posted June 18, 2008 at 11:50am (EDT) |
....trollish comment....bad rating.... abstain... next... |
Melf
| | #18 posted June 21, 2008 at 6:08am (EDT) |
I've done 891 so far. |
bill
| | #19 posted June 21, 2008 at 10:12am (EDT) |
That's over 4%! |
Melf
| | #20 posted June 21, 2008 at 10:23am (EDT) |
Way to put it in perspective. 
It's odd. I'm in Nov 2006 at the moment. It's going to be strange travelling backwards before my time. |
bill
| | #21 posted June 21, 2008 at 2:16pm (EDT) |
Biggles did something like this a while back, answering a lot of old surveys. I think she said it was pretty interesting to see how people changed over the years. |
Irene007
| | #22 posted June 22, 2008 at 7:37am (EDT) |
I know I've changed... |
Melf
| | #23 posted June 22, 2008 at 9:11am (EDT) |
I've not noticed, so far. But it's sort of inevitable.
I think I've really calmed down. Every other word was 'cool' two years ago. |
Irene007
| | #24 posted June 22, 2008 at 11:11am (EDT) |
I've stopped saying: "I wonder what Ben is up too..." *sigh* |
Melf
| | #25 posted June 22, 2008 at 12:06pm (EDT) |
 |
Irene007
| | #26 posted June 22, 2008 at 1:56pm (EDT) |
Ah... But now, I wonder about other things...  |
Biggles
| | #27 posted June 23, 2008 at 3:09pm (EDT) |
I've been ploughing through some more old surveys recently - I had no idea that Inactive New existed until this thread appeared! I've been mostly looking at ones from just before I joined SC, though I do tend to bounce around a lot and just pick a random survey number to stick in the address line. I did find it interesting seeing how the surveys about quite day-to-day things seemed to be frowned on in the early days of SC - although that may just have been because Richard (Hare Krishna Richard) was making a tonne of them. Also interesting to find the few surveys that seem to have brought most of the one-off-posters to the site - the first pantyhose survey has about 20 replies from people who are never heard of again, talking about their love of pantyhose! |
bill
| | #28 posted June 23, 2008 at 3:31pm (EDT) |
I should delete that before we get swamped with pantyhose pervs! |
cloudhugger
| | #29 posted June 23, 2008 at 4:06pm (EDT) |
Long live the hairnet pervs!!! |
Irene007
| | #30 posted June 23, 2008 at 6:36pm (EDT) |
Which reminds me, whatever happened to FordGuy? |
Melf
| | #31 posted June 23, 2008 at 6:46pm (EDT) |
Last I heard he was 'between projects.' But that was aaages ago. |
LindaH
| #32 posted June 23, 2008 at 7:26pm (EDT)
edited June 23, 2008 at 7:27pm (EDT) |
I wonder what would happen if we all started talking about peeing in our pantyhose.
edit:
 |
Melf
| | #33 posted June 24, 2008 at 7:18pm (EDT) |
Melf wrote:
> Isn't it that they don't show when the survey isn't active?
This bothers me every time I see it. |
verouge
| | #34 posted June 24, 2008 at 8:23pm (EDT) |
LindaH wrote:
> I wonder what would happen if we all started talking about peeing
> in our pantyhose.
>
> edit:
>
Or maybe..... masturbat*** |
cloudhugger
| | #35 posted June 25, 2008 at 8:58am (EDT) |
Verouge, honey...are you lost? this is feedback, you need to turn around and take a left to forum. |
Irene007
| | #36 posted June 25, 2008 at 10:19am (EDT) |
*snicker* |
verouge
| | #37 posted July 2, 2008 at 7:53pm (EDT) |
cloudhugger wrote:
> Verouge, honey...are you lost? this is feedback, you need to turn
> around and take a left to forum.
hehehe... no |
mrmarm
| | #38 posted July 6, 2008 at 12:09am (EDT) |
do iyt now barrt do it now now do it now hahahahhaha |
