|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
cloudhugger  
| | #1 posted July 4, 2008 at 12:42am (EST) |
I just saw "Hancock"
OMG
It was fantastic. |
they 
| | #2 posted July 4, 2008 at 12:46am (EST) |
Heh heh heh heh.
You said cock. |
they
| | #3 posted July 4, 2008 at 12:47am (EST) |
Never heard of it. Who's in it? |
jettles 
| | #4 posted July 4, 2008 at 7:19am (EST) |
they wrote:
> Heh heh heh heh.
>
>
> You said cock.
you said it too.... |
mrmarm
| | #5 posted July 4, 2008 at 8:42am (EST) |
Two of my friends saw hancock while my best friend and I watched Sex and the city, they said it was good. |
cloudhugger
| | #6 posted July 4, 2008 at 9:18am (EST) |
By far Will Smith's best role. |
they
| | #7 posted July 4, 2008 at 9:56am (EST) |
jettles wrote:
> they wrote:
>> Heh heh heh heh.
>>
>>
>> You said cock.
>
> you said it too....
Yeah, I like to say it  |
Irene007 
| | #8 posted July 4, 2008 at 11:38am (EST) |
Isn't he a bad guy in that movie but still a hero? |
verouge
| | #9 posted July 4, 2008 at 7:29pm (EST) |
What is this Hancock about??? Sex movie?
|
mrmarm
| | #10 posted July 4, 2008 at 7:32pm (EST) |
No if I was one of those I'd have watched it instead. |
verouge
| | #11 posted July 4, 2008 at 8:12pm (EST) |
U want some? I do have.. |
mrmarm
| | #12 posted July 4, 2008 at 8:42pm (EST) |
what? porno, what? |
verouge
| | #13 posted July 4, 2008 at 8:53pm (EST) |
movies.. |
mrmarm
| | #14 posted July 4, 2008 at 9:03pm (EST) |
oh ok hahaha, what type are you into, I love ethnic porn, I'm also starting to really bisexual porn, not one guy and two girls as much as two guys and one girl. |
cloudhugger
| | #15 posted July 5, 2008 at 10:24am (EST) |
I won't tell anything about the movie, it could spoil it. He is a superhero with a drinking problem...therein lies the awesome story. |
Melf 
| | #16 posted July 5, 2008 at 10:34am (EST) |
Eh. Mark Kermode, my favourite film critic, didn't like it. He says half way through it descends into usual superhero film badness.
Thoughts? |
cloudhugger
| | #17 posted July 6, 2008 at 9:09am (EST) |
Not seeing it. Perhaps he and I have very, make that extrememly, different ideas about what "usual superhero film badness" means. It is unlike any movie, let alone superhero movie I have ever see. I am not qualified to be a 'critic' because I haven't seen that many movies, but I have seen most superhero ones. This movie seemed to not be about the superhero with powers, not about the superhero wanting the girl, and it's about the family guy wanting to change the world's thinking through simple caring, compassion and understanding. The superhero is just one of the earth's citizens mucking about his life, going through the motions of doing "wht's right" because something tells him he has to, not knowing why he is alive. Typical earthbound feelings I think. The villians are not superhero villians, they are run of the mill butt-holes, the mind and emotions carry the superhero villianous acts and it's the guy who lives down the street who cares about the world one guy at a time. This plot does not seem to be like any of the others, so typical is far from my mind.
I cannot tell any moooorrrre.... |
Frostbrand
| | #18 posted July 6, 2008 at 2:15pm (EST) |
My Dad and I saw it yesterday, and it was awesome. The critics don't know what they're talking about. |
Melf
| | #19 posted July 6, 2008 at 3:12pm (EST) |
lol |
verouge
| #20 posted July 6, 2008 at 6:03pm (EST)
edited July 6, 2008 at 6:06pm (EST) |
cloudhugger wrote:
> Not seeing it. Perhaps he and I have very, make that extrememly, different
> ideas about what "usual superhero film badness" means. It is unlike
> any movie, let alone superhero movie I have ever see. I am not qualified
> to be a 'critic' because I haven't seen that many movies, but I have
> seen most superhero ones. This movie seemed to not be about the superhero
> with powers, not about the superhero wanting the girl, and it's about
> the family guy wanting to change the world's thinking through simple
> caring, compassion and understanding. The superhero is just one of
> the earth's citizens mucking about his life, going through the motions
> of doing "wht's right" because something tells him he has to,
> not knowing why he is alive. Typical earthbound feelings I think.
> The villians are not superhero villians, they are run of the mill
> butt-holes, the mind and emotions carry the superhero villianous acts
> and it's the guy who lives down the street who cares about the world
> one guy at a time. This plot does not seem to be like any of the others,
> so typical is far from my mind.
> I cannot tell any moooorrrre....
What else were u supposed to tell? |
verouge
| | #21 posted July 6, 2008 at 6:05pm (EST) |
mrmarm wrote:
> oh ok hahaha, what type are you into, I love ethnic porn, I'm also
> starting to really bisexual porn, not one guy and two girls as much
> as two guys and one girl.
Do u mean u're not gay anymore? You're more into bisexuality?
If I wana watch a porn movie, I prefer to watch a film between one female and one male, having normal sex life, no fetish, no unclean sex.. You're not expecting me to tell you about my fetishes here!! hehehehe  |
mrmarm
| | #22 posted July 6, 2008 at 7:50pm (EST) |
No, I'm still a homo, just bi porn turns me on a LOT more, however a gay old man in his 50's with a young attractive man in his 20's is pretty interesting and almost forbidly hot. Really the type you watch sounds .......... like the stuff out of movies or your neighours window just playing. I've hardly ever watched normal porn before and I doubt I'd find my fetish being adding into a porno storyline hahaha, you have fetishes hmm I'l have to guess in my mind then. |
jettles
| | #23 posted July 6, 2008 at 10:44pm (EST) |
> Yeah, I like to say it
it makes me strangely uncomfortable!  |
verouge
| #24 posted July 7, 2008 at 5:27am (EST)
edited July 7, 2008 at 5:30am (EST) |
You're just someone dirty obsessed by his fetishes about others' fetishes.. Fealix. |
mrmarm
| | #25 posted July 7, 2008 at 5:47am (EST) |
Hanh! yeah I get people to wrote them down on post it's and I collect them in a box and roll around in them. |
cloudhugger
| | #26 posted July 7, 2008 at 8:09am (EST) |
good grief, does every post have to host this? |
mrmarm
| | #27 posted July 7, 2008 at 9:09am (EST) |
yes, nah well god leave me alone I have the hormonals of a viagra addict, actually funny you say that cause I was gonna make up a link about my current insane hot flushes of sexual desire. I guess it could be the Jim bean too but my ears are burning too. |
moviesnob
| | #28 posted July 7, 2008 at 3:24pm (EST) |
You're asking for it Cloud when your first post had the letters "cock" in it! |
llamamama
| | #29 posted July 7, 2008 at 4:59pm (EST) |
I am very much tired of this too.
Please don't post that link..I am so not interested in what you desire sexually.
Marwan is the one agitating things, every single post that the two of them are on he has to bring up sex..It's rather annoying..This isn't some filthy hotel in a shady part of town..let it go.
And I do not want to hear an argument about your hormones. I know plenty of teenage boys that are atleast able to function without talking about that all day..
Ok, done with my rant.. |
Melf
| | #30 posted July 7, 2008 at 5:49pm (EST) |
 |
mrmarm
| | #31 posted July 8, 2008 at 8:02am (EST) |
moviesnob wrote:
> You're asking for it Cloud when your first post had the letters "cock"
> in it!
|
mrmarm
| | #32 posted July 8, 2008 at 8:17am (EST) |
llamamama wrote:
> I am very much tired of this too.
> Please don't post that link..I am so not interested in what you desire
> sexually.
> Marwan is the one agitating things, every single post that the two
> of them are on he has to bring up sex..It's rather annoying..This
> isn't some filthy hotel in a shady part of town..let it go.
> And I do not want to hear an argument about your hormones. I know
> plenty of teenage boys that are atleast able to function without talking
> about that all day..
> Ok, done with my rant..
relax |
cloudhugger
| | #33 posted July 8, 2008 at 11:22am (EST) |
Has anyone else seen the movie Hancock?, just to remind anyone who may have been able to get this far down the thread without their eyes rolling too far back down the back of their head and roll down their backside.. |
llamamama
| | #34 posted July 8, 2008 at 1:03pm (EST) |
My dad wanted to see it..but after reading a review and I watched the Today show..He determined that it sounds horrible. He said it had potential but they took it too far in that he hates life and he's a wino.
I did point out to him that some people liked it alot. |
Frostbrand
| | #35 posted July 8, 2008 at 1:18pm (EST) |
llamamama wrote:
> My dad wanted to see it..but after reading a review
> and I watched the Today show..He determined that
> it sounds horrible. He said it had potential but
> they took it too far in that he hates life and
> he's a wino.
> I did point out to him that some people liked
> it alot.
Add me to that list. The critics don't know what they're talking about. The fact that this awesome flick got a lower rating at Rotten Tomatoes than The Doom Generation (a movie so horrible I refused to sleep the night I saw lest anything from it got into my dreams) pretty much proves that. |
Melf
| | #36 posted July 8, 2008 at 1:22pm (EST) |
Ok, I thought you were joking at first. What do you mean by the critics don't know what they're talking about? |
Frostbrand
| | #37 posted July 8, 2008 at 1:52pm (EST) |
Melf wrote:
> Ok, I thought you were joking at first. What do
> you mean by the critics don't know what they're
> talking about?
Basically, from the reviews I've read, the critics seem to base their dislike for the film based on a plot twist at about the midway point in the film that I thought was brilliantly done.
Also, let's face it, these days critics have gotten so vicious in their reviews that one can't help but get the impression that they live in fear of ever seeing a movie they really like. |
llamamama
| | #38 posted July 8, 2008 at 2:22pm (EST) |
Oh yeah, I don't listen to the critics either..I mean, it's their opinion not mine.
What qualifies you to be a critic? The people who are movie critics are the same people who are soccer refs..*shudder*. |
cloudhugger
| | #39 posted July 8, 2008 at 5:51pm (EST) |
Frostbrand wrote:
> Melf wrote:
>> Ok, I thought you were joking at first. What
> do
>> you mean by the critics don't know what they're
>> talking about?
>
> Basically, from the reviews I've read, the critics
> seem to base their dislike for the film based
> on a plot twist at about the midway point in the
> film that I thought was brilliantly done.
>
> Also, let's face it, these days critics have gotten
> so vicious in their reviews that one can't help
> but get the impression that they live in fear
> of ever seeing a movie they really like.
|
cloudhugger
| | #40 posted July 8, 2008 at 5:52pm (EST) |
llamamama wrote:
> My dad wanted to see it..but after reading a review
> and I watched the Today show..He determined that
> it sounds horrible. He said it had potential but
> they took it too far in that he hates life and
> he's a wino.
> I did point out to him that some people liked
> it alot.
Llama's Dad"  |
|
|
