| | Author | Message |
|---|
bill  
| | #1 posted June 23, 2009 at 5:00am (EST) |
Question: DO YOU THINK COPS ARE BAD PEOPLE IN GENERAL OR ARE THEY JUST DOING THIER JOB?
Created: 2009-06-16 17:56:11
Creator: MANDER
Reason: By Admin
Type: multiple
Category: law
Sorted: yes
Offensive: no
Qualified: no
Active: yes
Rating: 60.0%
NumVotes: 15
NumHides: 0
Answer: YES
Answer: NO
Answer: SOMETIMES
Answer: NO THEY ARE JUST DOING THEIR JOB
Qualifiers:
Crayons: old: DO NOT USE CAPS. JUST WHERE NEEDED.
Biggles: needs work: Don't capitalise every word. It's "their". Which question do the options relate to? In other words, if I answer "Yes" am I saying that cops are bad people, or am I saying that they are just doing their job?
FordGuy: needs work: I THINK YOU SHOULD STOP YELLING
jettles: needs work: change the capitals
cerealkiller: needs work: I THINK YOU NEED TO QUIT SHOUTING AND LEARN HOW TO TYPE WITHOUT THE CAPSLOCK ON.
Strider: old:
Strider: reasonable:
paulyw: reasonable:
labjog: needs work: Why all caps?????
dab: needs work: You really don't have to yell at us. Turn off your caps lock.
Also make your answers match the question.
Finally, "their" is spelled ei not ie.
harry: nitpick: I'm confused: You have posed a double question (Do you think cops are bad... / Are cops just doing their job), and have listed two "no" responses.
OfTheSoul: nitpick: Shouldn't this be a single pick?
autumnlight: nitpick: STOP SHOUTING
Ratings:
dab: 50.0%
jettles: 50.0%
Frostbrand: 50.0%
Strider: 50.0%
Biggles: 50.0%
LindaH: 50.0%
autumnlight: 50.0%
OfTheSoul: 100.0%
FordGuy: 50.0%
paulyw: 100.0%
cerealkiller: 50.0%
labjog: 50.0%
Crayons: 50.0%
harry: 100.0%
JasperT: 50.0%
Comments:
| cloudhugger 
| | #2 posted June 23, 2009 at 9:07am (EST) |
Who is harry?
"capslock...capslock..." say it with me Linda lol
AND the answer to the question is: Everyone but Jeremy. | bill
| | #3 posted June 23, 2009 at 9:22am (EST) |
Jeremy was a cop.... well, he said he was. | LindaH 
| | #4 posted June 23, 2009 at 11:42am (EST) |
I merely stopped by this survey in qual, and there it shows me with a neutral rating. How did that happen if I didn't participate in qualifying? | bill
| | #5 posted June 23, 2009 at 3:27pm (EST) |
Hm. Is that different than how it used to work, maybe... I did make some changes related to that sort of thing.
I'm not sure it matters, though. All qual ratings get wiped once the survey is qualified. Also, a 50% rating has essentially no important effect on a survey in qual. That is to say it would not cause the survey to have a better or worse chance of being qualified due to the rating. A survey needs an average 50% or better to be qualified. So, a 50% rating has no effect on that. If the average was less than 50%, your 50 would bring it up slightly, but no enough to push it to 50% (well, there would need to be 100 people qualifying for the average to round up). If it's already 50%, then another 50 doesn't really matter. If it's over 50, another 50 would bring it down slightly but it could not push it below 50%.
I think this would also happen with qualified surveys, though... just viewing a qualified survey would cause a 50% rating to be cast. Of course, this is the default if you respond to the survey. But, I think it use to cast a "no rating" rating which was ignored rather than giving 50%. The 50% on a qualified survey would tend to drive survey ratings toward 50%, pushing such surveys subtly toward the middle. Minor effect, but it may matter.
Maybe I'll try to change it back to how it was. I had made some changes to how it worked in order to consolidate some code, but it hadn't occurred to me that my change had an effect in the just viewing not voting case. | bill
| | #6 posted June 23, 2009 at 3:36pm (EST) |
OK, I just made a change that I think will prevent a rating from being made just by viewing a survey (in qual or otherwise).
It's possible the change I just made will break something else. It's hard to tell. But, probably not and we'll have to see.
|
Topic Page Hits: 1 today (8 in the last 30 days) |
- Twitter 
- Facebook 