| | Author | Message |
|---|
bill  
| | #1 posted June 10, 2008 at 2:24am (EDT) |
Question: What would happen if.......................?
Explanation: What would happen if a gay man and a straight women got married under only the pretenses of marriage being a sign of their great friendship and nothing to do with sex, expect having children via sperm insemination. After a few years of dating other people, raising there children and a happy friendly marriage, would the women be legally allowed to marry another man however being heterosexual why also being married to her homosexual friend?
Created: 2008-06-03 06:22:06
Creator: Fealix
Reason: By Creator
Type: essay
Category: law
Sorted: yes
Offensive: no
Qualified: no
Active: yes
Rating: 54.5%
NumVotes: 26
NumHides: 0
Qualifiers:
LindaH: old: You mean if she was still married to her gay friend? This seems more like a legal question, as it is worded. It's an interesting survey though. I've imagined a somewhat similar scenario, involving a lesbian couple, and a gay male couple, sharing a house, and each marrying a friend of the opposite sex, for all the legal benefits. In fact, I considered making a survey about it.
LJD: old: There is no marriage really between the gay man, and straight woman. They for convenience, selfishly had children, They are really not a marriage the woman can marry another heterosexual male. A union is not a marriage if married for all the wrong reasons..deception.
cantilever: old: A divorce would be necessary. I dooubt if non-consumation could be verified.
cloudhugger: old:
cloudhugger: old:
jettles: old: what?? pretense then except instead of expect and then what about divorce?? this makes no sense!
jettles: old: what i said below
paulyw: old:
Crayons: old:
Strider: old:
they: hopelessly flawed: I've been trying to think of suggestions.
I really can't. I just don't think this is a survey.
Enigma: reasonable:
LindaH: reasonable:
Melf: hopelessly flawed: There are two questions here and neither make sense. I think the whole question should be reworked.
moviesnob: hopelessly flawed: This isn't really an opinion thing you can do a survey on - this is a factual question. Answer: If the woman got legally married, it's a legal marriage, so they'd need a divorce, or annulment, and she can be on her merry way.
You should also specify what country this is - right now I'm assuming US.
cerealkiller: needs work: Dumb question. Polygamy is not legal, at least in the U.S.
Strider: reasonable:
aquawolfy: *pick*: ..............huh?
ausfox: reasonable:
kirst: needs work: Your explanation is very confusing.
dab: needs work: [Except] having children...
[their] children...
[while] also being married...
And work on the run-on sentences please.
Ratings:
dab: 50.0%
kirst: 50.0%
they: 50.0%
Strider: 50.0%
LindaH: 100.0%
cerealkiller: 50.0%
moviesnob: 50.0%
Enigma: 50.0%
Melf: 50.0%
ausfox: 50.0%
aquawolfy: 50.0%
Comments:
| cloudhugger   
| | #2 posted June 11, 2008 at 1:59am (EDT) |
It's a question that does not make any logical sense. Needs option for  Never mind, it was the spicy chili I ate before I went to sleep. | Melf  
| | #3 posted June 11, 2008 at 4:39am (EDT) |
That should be a survey category. | cloudhugger
| | #4 posted June 11, 2008 at 10:40am (EDT) |
What would happen if that was a survey catagory? | FauxLo
| | #5 posted June 13, 2008 at 7:21pm (EDT) |
Oh Fealix... what the hell was this?  | cloudhugger
| | #6 posted June 14, 2008 at 10:20pm (EDT) |
Hey, Fauxlo...if you and I got married...would we be married? | LindaH
| | #7 posted June 14, 2008 at 10:38pm (EDT) |
I think it would be totally fun for someone to create a completely nonsensical survey, and for 5 people to reasonable it, and when it qualifies, a few of us 'play along' answering it and totally confuse the heck out of everyone else.
But it wouldn't be very nice. | FauxLo
| #8 posted June 16, 2008 at 7:14pm (EDT)
edited June 16, 2008 at 7:15pm (EDT) |
I don't know if we'd be married, Cloud... are you going to get hitched with my heterosexual friend after you're artificially knocked up with my good time soldiers? 
Sounds good, Linda. Let's get this party started.  | mrmarm
| | #9 posted June 18, 2008 at 9:23pm (EDT) |
That kinda what I was trying to do, cause half of the people in qual validated it as a worthy survey and question and the other half didn't so I wanted to see the outcome of people believing it to be a question and others not believing it to a question. Oh wait isn't that troll behaviour? hmmm I'll have to ask Carol about that one. *rolleyes* | LindaH
| | #10 posted June 18, 2008 at 9:33pm (EDT) |
Wanting to see how people perceive things isn't the least bit trollish. It's a perfectly legitimate way to see how people tick. Some of my surveys have been designed to see if people pick up 'missing info' or see something that's not there. I deliberately leave out details, to see how people fill it in. | mrmarm
| | #11 posted June 18, 2008 at 11:37pm (EDT) |
HA very clever, I sorta intended for this question to make sense but cause my words and the question didn't agree to make sense I thought i'd make a controversy, like yous. | cloudhugger
| | #12 posted June 19, 2008 at 5:22pm (EDT) |
We don't make controversy...the controversy is there, we just point at it and say something. | mrmarm
| | #13 posted June 22, 2008 at 3:04am (EDT) |
Yeah, good point. |
Topic Page Hits: 1 today (142 in the last 30 days) |
