Forum Search Forum Posts matching all AND Creator is "phi" In all forums :| Author | Message |
|---|
phi
| | #1 posted July 23, 2001 at 12:50am (EST) |
That's not my website that the link goes to. Sorry. |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
phi
| | #2 posted December 12, 2000 at 11:10am (EST) |
Not to my knowledge. But I run through a proxy, and the proxy might have tried a reload after some kind of network failure.
I just noticed that the survey's still there -- did you put it back, or is something else wierd going on? It was the second time in a few minutes that I'd cast the killer HF vote on a survey. Maybe it was some other error. | phi
| | #3 posted December 12, 2000 at 9:51am (EST) |
I just voted a survey HF for what appeared to me to be the 5th HF vote for that survey, and got this:
OK
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.
Please contact the server administrator, bill@surveycentral.org and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that
may have caused the error.
More information about this error may be available in the server error log.
I'm guessing that someone else also voted it HF in between when I loaded the page and when I submitted my vote. You might want to check for that, and recover to the next survey rather than displaying an error message. |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
phi
| | #4 posted December 1, 2000 at 5:25pm (EST) |
What I mean is, if I NW a survey and no one else has, then I can change my own vote to override, and then there will be an override without a corresponding NW. So when you're counting NWs, you shouldn't consider the user's own NW.
Yes, there has been a survey qualified because of this (NW followed by override of own NW followed by another NW). | phi
| | #5 posted November 30, 2000 at 7:03pm (EST) |
OK, but you should still check to make sure that there are NW comments other than the user's own comments before allowing them to choose 'override'. | phi
| | #6 posted November 20, 2000 at 6:22pm (EST) |
currently, if someone makes a needs work comment, and then someone overrides them, and then they change their comment, the survey can be left in the somewhat absurd state of having more overrides than NWs. I realize that it's hard to attach overrides to particular NWs, but often the survey's state is to have no NWs at all, in which case you could automatically change all the overrides to NAs.
Also, when you do the check to see if there is a NW to override before making the override available, you should make sure the available NW is not the user's own NW, which would obviously go away if they tried to override it. |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
phi
| | #7 posted May 13, 2000 at 7:43pm (EST) |
Everyone: this is reported to be a bug in the 'check comment' feature. Try turning it off. |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
phi
| | #8 posted April 13, 2000 at 12:07am (EST) |
If, when creating a survey, options are left entirely blank in between options which are in use, the survey does not display properly on the preview screen. The survey does, however, display (and function) properly once the final submit is made. This isn't a big deal, but you'd have to deal with it if you went ahead with the idea of adding more answers in between existing options. |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
phi
| | #9 posted March 31, 2000 at 11:52am (EST) |
yay unsorting! bill, you rock! |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
phi
| | #10 posted March 29, 2000 at 1:54pm (EST) |
When walking down the next links of a survey selector, the bizarre page you get if you hit one that was deleted between selector generation and page view does not contain a 'next' link. Quick fix: before generating the HTML for a page, check to see if the survey has been deleted and if it has, generate a redirect page to the next survey in the selector list (or back to the selector if it's the last one). |
Next page (only 10 shown here) |
|
