Forum Search Forum Posts matching all AND Creator is "Zang" In all forums :| Author | Message |
|---|
Zang
| | #1 posted May 9, 2007 at 12:42am (EST) |
cabinfever wrote:
> Frankly, I'm surprised at how many of you wouldn't
> call the police. Exposure is a 'gateway crime'....
> a lot of times it leads to much worse crimes.
Actually, you couldn't be more wrong. Exhibitions are cowards by nature. They're afraid of social intereaction of any sort.
> Not to mention, I had my little girl with me....
> she doesn't need to see some fishbelly-white wanker
> being waved at her.
So rather than ignoring it, you turned it into the biggest issue of the day. I'm sure that made much more of an impression on her than ignoring it would have.  | Zang
| | #2 posted May 7, 2007 at 2:46am (EST) |
Not something I can imagine calling the police over...I guess you must have been bored or something... |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Zang
| | #3 posted May 5, 2007 at 5:20pm (EST) |
Awww......that didn't last long, did it?  |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Zang
| #4 posted May 5, 2007 at 5:17pm (EST)
edited May 5, 2007 at 5:18pm (EST) |
This is pretty much what I've been on about all along. 
southernyankee wrote:
> If Bush wants to turn the US into a fascist country,
> he better do it fast, because he's gonna be out
> of here in a little over a year. Unless you want
> to argue that the neo-cons will stay in power,
> assuming that they have a chance in hell of getting
> elected, but even then it wouldn't be Bush.
>
> I think part of the definition of fascism is for
> the same guy to be in power for life, or for a
> very long long time, as fascists also tend to
> have a large ego. Most of the world's greatest
> fascists tended to have a great ego, and having
> to give up that power for some other neo-con would
> go against that.
You're just buying into the myth of a real democracy in the US. Your president is merely a puppet. It doesn't matter who is president or whether it is a Republican or a Democrat. The power structure won't change. That isn't who is really pulling the strings. You are living in a plutocracy. |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Zang
| | #5 posted May 5, 2007 at 5:08pm (EST) |
LindaH wrote:
> The problem with most people when they date, is
> that they have all these expectations. If people
> would jump into dating with reckless abandon,
> the same way people openly go about establishing
> friendships, there would be no need for all these
> crackpot little "tips and pointers". People just
> need to relax and quit thinking of the opposite
> sex as some mysterious entity that needs to be
> hyperanalysed and understood. Think of your date
> as your friend, and let it go whichever direction
> it's gonna go.
> Whoof!
I couldn't agree with you more. |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Zang
| | #6 posted May 1, 2007 at 7:33pm (EST) |
romkey:
 |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Zang
| | #7 posted May 1, 2007 at 7:32pm (EST) |
LindaH wrote:
> Have we checked Phil Spector's hair?
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Zang
| | #8 posted April 25, 2007 at 10:09pm (EST) |
cerealkiller wrote:
> Is your assumption that child abuse would be commonly
> thought to be the worst in the USA? It depends
> too on the standards, type of abuse, etc.
That was very much like my reaction. You take a group of "experts" in one country and a different group of "experts" in another country to make estimates and compile reports. They're not talking to each other. They're not working from the same frames of reference. You can't reasonably draw conclusions by comparison. Child abuse isn't a precise and tangible entity. The whole thing is too subjective and open to interpretation. |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Zang
| | #9 posted April 24, 2007 at 6:02pm (EST) |
There seems to be an exact duplicate of this still in qualification. |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
Zang
| | #10 posted April 24, 2007 at 6:00pm (EST) |
*sarcasm mode*
Obviously, she wants the terrorists to win! |
Next page (only 10 shown here) |
|
