cloudhugger wrote: > If this happy post goes negative, for the record
> it started with this...
>> Hmm. Only comments on this thread are filtered.
> If I were a gambling man, I'd put a few bucks
> on one of those being a below the belt cheap attack
> from CK.
And it ended with Biggles informing me I was wrong. Now, are you a fellow MSTie? If so, have you checked out some of the post-MST projects these guys have done like The Film Crew, Cinematic Titanic, or RiffTrax? I got to see a live RiffTrax for Plan 9 From Outer Space last year. It was awesome.
#4 posted January 21, 2010 at 12:38am (EST) edited January 21, 2010 at 12:49am (EST)
FauxLo wrote: > That's cool, Brian. I used to watch this on the
> weekends years and years ago, but then it switched
> channels or somethings. Good find. Now I have
> to find the time to actually check it out.
Biggles wrote: > Frostbrand wrote: >> Hmm. Only comments on this thread are filtered.
> If I were a gambling
>> man, I'd put a few bucks on one of those being
> a below the belt cheap
>> attack from CK.
>
> If you were a gambling man, you'd have lost a
> few bucks...
Really. Hmm, I'm surprised. Well, there's only 5 people it could be, so I really only had a 20% of getting it right anyway. I imagine no self-respecting gambler would ever take those kind of odds.
Hmm. Only comments on this thread are filtered. If I were a gambling man, I'd put a few bucks on one of those being a below the belt cheap attack from CK.
I forgot to share the awesomeness with you people here at SC! I shared this on Twitter, and Facebook, and on my podcast, but I left out the community I've been with for like a decade now.
llamamama wrote: > cerealkiller wrote: > a A bunch of Right Wing bullcrap filled with cheap insults
Wow. You think that quoting a sociopathic racist will bolster your argument? I don't know if I ever apologized for those times I called you a chicken before, but if I i did, I officially take them back, as it turns I was right the first time. A shame really. You sure can come off as smart sometimes. I guess you have to work really hard to do that though if you take CK's crap at face value.
By the way, according to a GOP exit poll, only 38% of MA voters driven by opposition to Obama policies & direction http://bit.ly/8euIar Kinda puts a dent in FordGuy's, CK's, and your stupid argument doesn't it? After all, this is a GOP poll, not something from the So-Called Liberal Media.
You're filtered now. Buh-bye. Enjoy your time with CK. Maybe he can drive you to his next cross burning.
llamamama wrote: > I obviously don't..that was also sarcasm.
>
> How about this, the day a majority of the United
> States agrees with you..that's when I'll join
> your side. Until then, you're the idiot for constantly
> bringing it up.
The majority obviously does agree with me. They agreed with me on election day. They agree that the watered down health care bill doesn't go far enough which is why support for it dips every time the Obama Admin. cow tows to the Right and the Insurance Lobby. They eventually came around to my side on the Iraq War too. But I'll keep all these rather petty instances of you calling me an idiot the next time you drag out the old "all you ever do is insult people" line.
> And yes..I totally hate gay people and I wish
> someone would beat me.
>
I don't really think you do, which is what makes your enthusiasm over this guy all the more confusing.
> The eye rolling is sarcasm you idiot. Get your
> panties out of the knot they're in and get over
> the fact that I have a different opinion from
> you. As wrong or as right as you may think it
> is.
Think? Do I have to give you more about this guy? There's no "thinking" about it (go ahead, take that out of t\context to make me look bad; I made it easy for you this time). This is not a good man, and you being happy about his election speaks ill of you, regardless of how you try to turn this into me being the bad guy. I don't say things like "We can do this" when one of my supporters says "Let's shove a curling iron up her butt," referring to a rape case Coakley was involved in prosecuting as Mass.'s Attorney General.
So who is the real idiot here? The guy who's mad that a racist homophobic reactionary is in the Senate, or the kid who somehow thinks this is good news?
