Searching "comments":
| # | Comment | Survey |
|---|---|---|
| 31 | Zang: If the activities were held at school, there were likely additional costs that were covered by taxpayers, such as light, heat, and security. | Do you think that public schools should sponsor social clubs? |
| 32 | So, um, then radio stations should continue playing their music even if their constituents are very vocal about not wanting to hear it? Even if people then switch stations? Even if the ad sponsors leave because the station now has fewer listeners? I think it's silly of people to be so petty about this issue, but I've heard the droves and droves calling into a local country station, and I don't know what else the radio station can do unless it wants to go bankrupt. | Should radio stations ban the Dixie Chicks based on their comments? |
| 33 | I was so sure this was a KR survey... | What kind of plant could "save the world"? |
| 34 | It's interesting how you feel the need to personally attack people who criticize your surveys, rather than bothering to understand what they are getting at. Personally, I often read select chapters of non-fiction books, as well as skim text for pieces of information I need. This adds up to a lot of reading, although it is not reflected in a large total number of books under your definition (which should have been spelled out in the survey itself). It would be kind of silly if I were to read all of the many technical books I need for work from cover to cover. I would never get any work done. I don't know of anyone who reads these straight through. | How many books do you think you read a year? |
| 35 | Words like "duh", "putz" and "doofus" do not normally indicate simple "disagreement", and you know it. You are the one who started using words such as those. Technical books are books. "duh", to use your terminology. You've now had several people pointing this issue out to you. If you want to continue creating surveys that are flawed because you refuse to listen to valid criticism, fine. But when you attack me after I've civilly pointed out your survey's flaws in qual, I am going to call you on it. | How many books do you think you read a year? |
| 36 | This was my original comment about your survey in qual: "I'm assuming "read" means all of, or the vast majority of. But it would be nice if you spelled that out, or included just skimming or reading selected chapters of a book." Polite, succinct, no personal attack. Your response: "ptero (Comment in Qual): Well duh I mean read all the way through. What kind of putz can't tell that's what I meant? And who's the doofus whot hinks that skimming through something, or just skipping to the end counts as "Reading?" That's cheating folks. End of story, and it DOES NOT COUNT." You are clearly the rude one, Brian. You consistently respond to criticisms of your surveys by freaking out and attacking the people who make them. This is a mild example, actually. Ask one of your cohorts, such as Mandy, if this is true, since you do not believe me and since you do not see the obvious. | How many books do you think you read a year? |
| 37 | You haven't made your case in a logical or non-insulting manner, and again, I call you on it. "Since you have no discernable sense of humor" is of course insulting, and is meant as such. As least take responsibility for it instead of trying to insult people and then pass it off as humor. I guess novels are not books, since they are not normally called "novel books". And I guess comic books *are* books, since they have the word "book" in them. | How many books do you think you read a year? |
| 38 | I love the Geico gecko. There have been some other cute animal commercials, none of which leap to mind at the moment. | What kinds of TV commercials do you like most? |
| 39 | I was sitting here with my left ankle crossed over my right ankle. I guess I'm left-legged, even though I'm right-handed. | How do you cross your legs? |
| 40 | It's not. | So, why is your country the best in the world? |
