Searching "comments":
| # | Comment | Survey |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Some acts can be done out of love, or out of self righteousness. When it is done in love, it is right. If it is done in self righteous meddling, it is wrong.
Take for example, someone standing in the way in a pedestrian crosswalk, because he sees there is someone looking to turn the wrong way down a one way street. He wants to protect people from injury, and prevent a crash. This is a right act, because he is averting potential disaster. Now let's say it is the same situation, only this time it is known that the driver regularly turns down this road the wrong way on purpose, to immediately shortcut into a driveway when no one is coming. Someone stands there, "because he shouldn't be doing that" knowing no disaster is possible. This is a wrong act. | Are there any commandments you think should be added to the original 10? |
| 12 | I never experienced any negative effects in the first place. | Do you think the economy is getting better? |
| 13 | No, I didn't notice them. | Do you think the economy is getting better? |
| 14 | I'd be more concerned about the men (any of them)
Regarding crazy or drunk/on drugs, it would depend on what they were doing. I don't feel threatened by that unless a person was acting threatening. | You're walking along a dark street and a stranger approaches you. Who is potentially the most dangerous? |
| 15 | Some people are actually more vulnerable while crazy, drunk or on drugs. | You're walking along a dark street and a stranger approaches you. Who is potentially the most dangerous? |
| 16 | A little woman on a sedative isn't going to be much of a threat. | You're walking along a dark street and a stranger approaches you. Who is potentially the most dangerous? |
| 17 | But they aren't necessarily dangerous. | You're walking along a dark street and a stranger approaches you. Who is potentially the most dangerous? |
| 18 | It depends on what they are on. Some drugs physically weaken or disorient a person to the point they can't fight, or sedate them so much they wouldn't want to. A person like that is in no condition to hurt anyone. If you see a person looking like they are on sedating, relaxing stuff, there's not much of a chance they would be any danger.
Not being in a clear mind doesn't necessarily mean a person would be in a violent mind. | You're walking along a dark street and a stranger approaches you. Who is potentially the most dangerous? |
| 19 | True. I think my reaction to a crazy or drugged person wouldn't be instant worry or fear. I'd kind of 'read' their potential for dangerousness by how they are acting, what they are doing and saying. A guy dancing around and laughing just does not seem or feel threatening to me at all. Neither does someone zoning out, slurring speech, and acting ultra mellow and floppy. | You're walking along a dark street and a stranger approaches you. Who is potentially the most dangerous? |
| 20 | At what point would you consider a person acting "crazy" as opposed to appearing like they could be sane, but merely acting silly or playing around?
In other words: When would it become 'scary'? | You're walking along a dark street and a stranger approaches you. Who is potentially the most dangerous? |
