Forum Search Forum Posts matching all AND Creator is "sequel" In all forums :| Author | Message |
|---|
sequel
| | #1 posted December 21, 2001 at 5:56pm (EST) |
Let's see... you set up qualification in such a way that it is majority rule, a democracy of a kind, and then you want to prevent people from voicing their opinions on a survey if you don't happen to agree with them? You also think you are able to read someone's mind and see what their intentions were by commenting a certain way. Wow, how hypcritical of you. And how crappy of you to decide that people should not be allowed to say w e e s and that you will instead put words in their mouth.
You SHOULD take a llook in qual before siding with cody, bill. Cody rabidly attacks anyone who says anthing critical about his surveys, routinely writing several name-calling paragraphs in response to a mild one-sentence suggestion.
I would take a look at myself, bill, if I were you, to see who is really harsh.
Your w e e s / mindless translation also has an interesting effect on search results.
I'm sure you'll be quite happy to hear that I am so sick of this I won't be coming back. |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
sequel
| | #2 posted December 16, 2001 at 4:34am (EST) |
I don't know that ASB directed that at you. I think it's a valid question about bill's SC policies. I've wondered about it myself. |
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
sequel
| | #3 posted December 5, 2001 at 1:05am (EST) |
Hmmm... I suppose you're also forced to click on comments that say "sequel" by them?  Sucks to be you. | sequel
| | #4 posted December 4, 2001 at 6:42pm (EST) |
<BLOCKQUOTE>I am baffled as to how http://surveycentral.org/survey/9798.html passed</BLOCKQUOTE>
Perhaps someone used multiple accounts to push it through. | sequel
| | #5 posted December 4, 2001 at 6:39pm (EST) |
If you've "had enough of it", then it's strange that you continue addressing comments to me. | sequel
| | #6 posted December 4, 2001 at 6:35pm (EST) |
"I'll repeat once more... a hypocrite is someone who makes statements which they do not believe in". Excuse me? That is *not* a repetition of anything. Before, you wrote that a hypocrite is "someone who acts differently in private than they do in public".
The definition I gave before is perfectly correct. Someone who "professes to have certain standards or beliefs that don't evince themselves in his behaviour" IS a hypocrite, and that is consistent with your dictionary.com definition.
It's funny that someone who supposedly filtered me is still responding to my posts.
I guess you're a liar as well as a hypocrite. | sequel
| | #7 posted December 4, 2001 at 11:27am (EST) |
A hypocrite is someone who has different standards for other people than he does for himself, or who professes to have certain standards or beliefs that don't evince themselves in his behaviour. You are one. | sequel
| | #8 posted December 4, 2001 at 11:23am (EST) |
You are such a total and complete dork, please do put me on your ignore list. | sequel
| | #9 posted December 3, 2001 at 3:49pm (EST) |
He says that even making these comments is "harassment"... | sequel
| | #10 posted December 2, 2001 at 9:59pm (EST) |
cody: You hypocrisy is mind-boggling.
Below are your comments on a survey currently in qualification. They directly contradict your comments here in the forum. YOU are the user who questioned a survey creator for saying "a hundred" instead of "one hundred."
<BLOCKQUOTE>
Although your wording "In a hundred years from now," is probably common usage in many places, I find it to be irregular and somewhat dstracting.
I'd change "a hundred", to "one hundred".
I'd either say "In x years" or "X years from now?" Not "In x years from now."
And honestly, I'd probably adjust to "who do you think will be more of a legend".
The sentence structure is very aversive to me in it's current form due to my perceptions of it's irregularity, I strongly suggest you alter the wording.
</BLOCKQUOTE> |
Next page (only 10 shown here) |
|
