| Author | Message |
|---|
NthenSome
| | #1 posted February 26, 2003 at 8:37pm (EST) |
<small>When you find a crumpled piece of paper. Is it worth taking the time and effort to unfold it and smooth it out.</small>
Depends...Can I imagine that I have found this crumpled piece of paper in William Shakespeare's wastebasket...?
(But I get your point, D.) | NthenSome
| | #2 posted February 26, 2003 at 8:32pm (EST) |
Hey, Jen!
Feel free to email me any ol' time: Joe_Dougherty@paramount.com - I enjoy your company as well...take care! | NthenSome
| | #3 posted February 24, 2003 at 6:31pm (EST) |
Quoting you, Kaleb777...<small>That gay film survey in no way was an attack on homosexuals. I'm sure you wouldn't have spat the dummy (pacifier) if there was a survey about strange heterosexual combinations for a porn movie. I assume you want to be treated the same as any other person. If that is the case, why do you go off the deep end when gay sex is discussed in the same way as heterosexual sex? people take the piss out of all types of sex all the time. You took great offence to people making a joke about gay sex, so clearly you want to be treated differently and with kid gloves.</small>
Um...Kaleb? I, uh, never once said it was offensive to gays, if you'll notice... I never even thought that, to be honest. So, um...who's "spatting the dummy", as you so eloquently put it? | NthenSome
| | #4 posted February 23, 2003 at 11:45pm (EST) |
*swats that persistent gnat buzzing around ears, finally with accuracy - dead; sails onward, toward life* | NthenSome
| | #5 posted February 23, 2003 at 7:17pm (EST) |
*sails free from the island, marking the event into journal*
"As the strange one bounces from hilltop to hilltop in honor of my departure, sporting the freshly-laid warpaint from her maddened countenance, I wonder to myself...do I attempt to send the poor soul a rescue boat?
"I reluctantly decide to not...the society will form as it will, as surely as the so-called 'Lord of the Flies' will endure them all. But certainly by no burden of my own. Gladly...by no burden of my own..."
The end.
*laughs back at the strange one, overjoyed by the freedom* | NthenSome
| | #6 posted February 21, 2003 at 7:50pm (EST) |
"...found SC to still just be a place of horror and injustice, as you quite bluntly stated in your initial lambasting comment in this thread..."
Your very crisp and unyielding contribution to everything in the above description is a great reminder to why I left...thanks (and yuk).
Again, open a window - it's real stuffy in here. | NthenSome
| | #7 posted February 21, 2003 at 4:05pm (EST) |
The "Kelly" person ceased although the company managed further communication from someone for the credit card app through "DubblZero", though it didn't originate from me. Had they let me know at the time, I would have not changed my AOL password, which apparently disabled his access. And I've learned a Postmaster will not reveal the results of an investigation, even to those who ask for one to be initiated, unless there's recompense to be settled by the offense.
But...you don't really care about any of that. You only hope to respond in a safe way. In a way that be might assumed you're being "smug" by those who see only your ever-convincing side of a story, while at the same time accomplishing an image that might be assumed "genuinely interested" by anyone else.
Again - this is what you're "too good" at... | NthenSome
| | #8 posted February 19, 2003 at 9:08pm (EST) |
So, does that clear up why a lovely gurl like me...might have a bur under her saddle about you?
Yes, and quite clearly, thank you. You know, some people suspect things until they prove or disprove them for themselves with additional (and just information). I myself had suspected that you never separated from that episode for me, although twice you claimed I didn't know what I was talking about when I asked what had you continuing to believe it that I was that horrible being. You even spoke to me of "Dubbl" in third-person - all for my benefit, I guess.
That is 'suspicion'. You seem to jump over that step and lunge right into a "decision" about things. The interesting thing is that you only remained "decided" about me in particular, although initially you believed Bill when he accused Cuteasabutton - and three others - of being related to Dubbl as well.
Here's another truth I'm sure you'll scoff - your accusation is beyond hurtful at this point. Bill repeated this to me recently, which drove me to a place I don't visit often - anger. It's not harming because I always quickly rescue myself from that emotion, but who enjoys being driven there?
Each time you restate this absolutely stupid claim, I'm reminded of some of the things that jerk said to people like Lovelight and Biggles, etc. I looked around one time, to put together a picture of this person and discovered the incredibly downright mean things he said to people here, which seem to have come from nowhere and been prompted by noone. It's a shame that you continue to incorrectly announce this "truth" of yours on SC. You're incorrect but you simply don't give a crap about that. That's pretty friggin' unfeeling.
I know a thing or two about systems myself - in fact, I'm the systems administrator for a major studio in Southern California, responsible for the network and the implementation/support of all applications for six of the studio's facilities, in four states and two countries. I know the number of ways an IP address can be both generated, addressed and managed.
I have long waited for someone like you to show me what has made you so certain about my supposed relation to whomever pulled all those stunts on me. But your post above is nothing but some conversation I had when I first met Cleo on this site, relating to her my story of some person named "Dubbl". This is your Earth-shattering proof to your claim? Good lord!
Yes, incidentally, this person provided that screen name "Dubbl" in every site registration he signed me up - including Hypertales, for every magazine subscription he had delivered to my home address, and (I assume) for the credit card frauds he attempted with my offline, real identity (and once managed it under the name of "Kelly"-something). I never directly connected the same character to the $1,100 phone bill that was rung up in just one month, but I have suspected it was him since it was in the same time frame...and since he obviously managed to pull things off my physical drives, including a short story, which he posted, and - probably from a file with registration information I once kept on the computer, a password I commonly use everywhere.
You: ...how unlikely that is and what a huge coincidence it would be, that the very same stalker who had done all those things to you would have just *happened* to be a user of SC a short while *before* you arrived. Apparently, you see, Mandy, when you register as a member of SC, you begin to receive emails from SC. I have a number of times mentioned how I would never discovered SC if it weren't for "Dubbl" registering me with my email address - DubblZero@aol.com (hence the "Dubbl" he chose, you see). What the hell is so "coincidental" about checking out a site that's advertised to you?
Also, I offered you the very tangible proof to all of this I've listed here - the letters I had written to AOL, to Pacific Southern Bell, to a distant Postmaster, to an online credit card company, to my sister, asking for her assistance in getting AOL to help me since she and her husband worked there. At the time, it all had been posted in my AOL Hometown area so my sister could download it for herself. All you had to do when this debate came up that time was merely click the link I had provided, but...you "didn't feel like reading" at the moment.
Real nice, Mandy. To conveniently reject what might disprove something you believe? Why? What was the intention there? How can you be that emotionally committed to a suspicion - hell, even to a decision - when someone who you repeatedly and publicly humiliate with an accusation that is absolutely horrendous in nature denies it just as often?
My suspicion is that I think you'd have a much bigger problem finding out that I am in fact not the monsterous being you've believed I am all this time. For some reason, you hang onto how that would be less fair than to simply peruse the images of documents that supported my defense.
Well, there's that wonderful feeling again. Thanks for nothing, Mandy. I really hope you don't share this side of you with many others in your life because you're too good at it - it causes the harm it seems it is set out to accomplish. | NthenSome
| | #9 posted February 19, 2003 at 7:47pm (EST) |
You know, I'll assume you're 100% correct and so I apologize for having pulled in your name with that. I guess I'm not sure where I got the impression you "celebrated my disgust".
And, incidentally, I'll acknowledge how you present a good defense for yourself when I described your question as 'obscure'. So, I duly apologize for that as well. I hope that disclaimer I installed immediately following those claims (where I offered, "It's not you, it's me - I tire easily these days,") diffused any antagonism it may have otherwise seemed aimed to generate.
That being said...I guess I recant. | NthenSome
| | #10 posted February 19, 2003 at 4:07am (EST) |
Aren't these games tiresome? You just speculated about five different possibilities for me to consider just to get to the one question you buried in there (somewhere).
You had me at "Erm".
It's not you - I tire easily these days. I only returned to point out how it seems "The Lord of the Flies" effect has been strangely emboldened at this place. When members - who in the past were possibly embraced as part of some supposed SC family - when those members have become frustrated and/or inflamed enough to feel that absconding the joint is their only option in finding peace from the situation at hand...suddenly, the word "family" reveals how it's really an operative term that prompts some members to smear on the warpaint and bounce from the hilltops, sardonically waving, hissing and jeering at the one leaving.
But who am I to suggest that this isn't the way God or Allah or Elvis Presley intended for us all to live as a society? Hell, those three could be smiling appreciatively on the proficiency of a group who can collectively practice this sort of behavior - and it may very well promise a much more productive and spiritual outcome for you all, for all I know. I should just mind my own business and let the process take its course, I suppose. (And the above is really just an extremely animated analogy, long before it should be considered an aim to insult anyone.)
In fact, I'll spare you (particularly) any more dialogue from me (particularly)...I mean, what possibly could interest you, ICUROK, to read more views of mine, NTHENSOME? You don't even slightly know me. However, to offer a response to your obscure question, you knew me even less when you readily celebrated along with the other two heckling "warriors" about my disgust at that particularly disgusting survey of pure disgust. (And I apologize for inserting yet another tasteless analogy.)
"Erm..." I think I finally addressed your question, I'm not sure. In either case, I'll discontinue the now-embarrassing amount of hypocricy that my behavior displays here (and, I'll admit, can be judged such). I'll go back to not bugging SC. |
Next page (only 10 shown here) |
